Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
I think we can all agree that prior to entering politics, both PP and JT had unimpressive resumes.
Carney, on the other hand...well.
"Poilievre..he's just like Trudeau"

|
While our history of banter has been 99% hostile, I do come in peace, and admittedly absolutely agree with you (this time!).
What is funny if Carney adopted the slogan “Poilievre… he’s just like Trudeau”, it would be yet another part of Cons platform they adopted.
There are very select few individuals in this country that can match up to Carney’s work experience and education, let alone any politician. I admire that about Carney. Carney is infinitely better than Trudeau. What is actually appealing is he has a history of supporting both sides of the political spectrum. From what I observe he’s not a “Liberal at all costs” kind of person, what Trudeau represented.
My issues with Carney are the following
- he blatantly lied to Canadians stating he had no part in the relocation of Brookfield head office from Canada to the New York, in the name of looking after shareholders best interests during this difficult tariffs war time. In his role at the time, he absolutely had to look out for the best interests of the shareholders. I don’t dispute that. What I do dispute is his blatant lie to Canadians about his role.
- His policy of continuing the carbon tax on industry. He will continue to artificially inflate the price of production, which most certainly has trickle affect that the consumer ultimately pays. He is advocating for this even during the greatest tariff war this country has ever seen. The least he could do is come out and say the tax on industry will be suspended until the tariff war concludes. If there is anything that will drive businesses out of this country or bankrupt them, ultimately lowering Canada’s emissions, it will be the massive tariffs. No need to further artificially inflate the price.
- On the same subject, he again tries to lie saying the carbon tax on industry has no effect on consumers, when everyone Econ 101 course says that the consumer ultimately pays the price. In that one interview, (I can’t recall who with, CTV maybe?) he responds to the question saying something along the lines of “how much steel have you purchased” sort of thing. The least he could do is explain the impact of the tax on the consumer. He is an Econ whiz after all.
- His history of anti-Canada resource development, whilst investing in the same industry and infrastructure in other countries and jurisdictions.
- His uninformed, poorly communicated, (not a lie) but inaccurate information of Canada’s role in supply semiconductors to the USA. I get that the Liberals walked it back and explained what he meant, but he came across as someone that should know it, but doesn’t.
Anyway. I’ll likely get ridiculed for my points against Carney, but know that I come in peace, and I am thrilled that Trudeau is on his way out, and happy that man like Carney with his stature is now the PM for at least the time being, no matter the political party he represents.