Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav
YYC's relatively poor standing for # of foreign carriers is not a reflection of demand or traffic levels. Rather, it is a result of WS's dominance and building their fortress hub.
|
When WS had zero widebodies and therefore zero long haul international flights, YYC was still struggling to attract foreign carriers. So that's not entirely true.
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav
Avianca is an odd one, they technically have all these separate "companies" for each country (Avianca El Salvador, Avianca Costa Rica, etc). But they are more like a combined entity than anything distinct (they share one booking system, fleet, and identical livery). Really seems more like the relationship of AC Express, Rouge, and mainline to each other, just brands or divisions of one airline but count as one.
|
Avianca El Salvador is the former TACA international airlines.
Avianca Costa Rica is LACSA.
They still have their own IATA/ICAO codes and callsigns (If you have a look on FR24, you will see this). The ownership and branding has changed, but the the operating licenses still belong to those specific airlines. These airlines are still needed due to the fact that several separate countries are involved, each with its own regulatory hurdles for domestic or foreign passenger carriage.
This is why Avianca cannot simply absorb them all into the mainline AV banner. They need to keep the subsidiaries separate, due to regulatory hurdles. So in that context, it makes sense to identify each airline separately, especially when they involve separate countries. The fact that Avianca is paying the bills is a secondary issue. As you said, it's a bit like AF and KL, but with the planes painted in the same livery.