HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


View Poll Results: Who has the more positive vision for Canada's future?
Mark Carney's Liberals 176 73.95%
Pierre Poilievre's Conservatives 62 26.05%
Voters: 238. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1021  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 4:31 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Well, for starters the federal government which is accountable for transfers to the provinces for healthcare has hugely reduced its contributions to this sector since the 70s and 80s, to the point of virtual collapse, with the provinces having to pick up the slack.

So in that sense it is a federal political issue.
According to the National Post, federal health transfers to the provinces have increased in the past 20 years by more than the provinces have increased spending on healthcare.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/

Last edited by Changing City; Feb 12, 2025 at 4:43 PM.
     
     
  #1022  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 4:39 PM
LuluBobo LuluBobo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2022
Location: Saskatchewan
Posts: 207
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
According to the National Post, federal health transfers to the provinces has increased in the past 20 years by more than they have increased spending on healthcare.
The numbers are $15 billion in 2005 and $47 billion in 2023.

$15 billion in 2005 is $22 billion in real dollars.

Canada had a population of 32 million in 2005 and 40 million in 2023.

So in terms of real per capita dollars it was $687 in 2005 and $1175.

On the surface, it does appear the feds are contributing much more in 2023 than in 2005.
     
     
  #1023  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 4:44 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Is it the feds' dollar contribution that is increasing that is most important, or the share of health care spending that they are paying for?

https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/september-2024/canada-health-transfer-provinces/
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #1024  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 4:45 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
I believe the allegation from the provinces is about the share that has been decreasing, from in the 1970s when the feds basically matches dollar-for-dollar everything the provinces spent.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #1025  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 5:09 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,735
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
I'm not sure how the topic of 'access to healthcare' ended up featuring on the federal election thread. I'm pretty sure it's not going to be the basis of most elector's voting intentions.

The availability of a regular doctor is only one part of the Commonwealth Fund survey (that you are referencing). In the more comprehensive study "The United States ranks last overall. The three top-performing countries in 2024 are Australia, the Netherlands, and the United Kingdom." …

…For example, yes, 99% of UK residents are registered with a GP, because the way the NHS works generally encourages that. Most GP practices accept registration. But the average GP in the UK has twice as many registered patients as the average Canadian GP, so the availability of an appointment to see a doctor in many parts of the country reflects that difference.

Which is not to say that provinces don't need to do more to improve the availability of primary healthcare, and to ensure there is adequate GP coverage. It doesn't seem to be a critical federal election issue though.
I was wondering about that. If you go through UK media it seems filled with NHS horror stories. Similarly, if the US system ranks highly in this metric, why did so many Americans cheer on the murder of that healthcare executive?

My own GP suddenly retired last month so I’m in the “no family doctor” boat right now too.
     
     
  #1026  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 5:28 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,716
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I was wondering about that. If you go through UK media it seems filled with NHS horror stories. Similarly, if the US system ranks highly in this metric, why did so many Americans cheer on the murder of that healthcare executive?
Two things:

1. The post you quoted says "In the more comprehensive study "The United States ranks last overall."" So the US system does not rank highly in this metric.
2. When you do manage to navigate the hellscape that is the US medical insurance system the care is generally good, but the tremendous pains in dealing with medical insurance is why Luigi is celebrated.
     
     
  #1027  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:02 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
I’ve also been without a family doctor since mine retired several years ago. Tried a bit and couldn’t find one. No big deal. (I don’t expect much from the healthcare system in the first place.)

For an emergency, I’d just go to the emergency ward and wait a couple days with a few good books, an internet connections, a pillow and a blanket. No need for a family doctor.
     
     
  #1028  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:06 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
I'm not sure how the topic of 'access to healthcare' ended up featuring on the federal election thread.
The next Federal election will be about Trump, and whether or not access to healthcare is worse right now in the 51st State than in the other 50 states has some bearing on the ~43% of young Canadians who would want Canada to merge with the USA given decent enough Terms of Union.

So, it’s kind of on topic these days, at least tangentially.
     
     
  #1029  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:08 PM
YOWetal YOWetal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 7,678
Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45 View Post
The next Federal election will be about Trump, and whether or not access to healthcare is better in the 51st State than in the other 50 states has some bearing on the ~43% of young Canadians who would want Canada to merge with the USA given decent enough Terms of Union.

So, it’s kind of on topic these days.
Yes the delusional nature of the 18-29 crowd about this issue but life in general in the United States as well as how bad our economy is and how bad things could get are all very relevant to how they will vote in the next election though with a likely low turnout and their over concentration in urban areas they are unlikely to be an important factor in the results.
     
     
  #1030  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:36 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by YOWetal View Post
Yes the delusional nature of the 18-29 crowd about this issue but life in general in the United States as well as how bad our economy is and how bad things could get are all very relevant to how they will vote in the next election though with a likely low turnout and their over concentration in urban areas they are unlikely to be an important factor in the results.
They have been discouraged their whole lives from having any national identity. They have been told by their Prime Minister for 10 years how awful their country is and how guilty they should feel about it. They have been unable to afford (or restricted by COVID) from travel and other life experiences. They can’t afford shit. It is not surprising they are not very patriotic.
     
     
  #1031  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:47 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I believe the allegation from the provinces is about the share that has been decreasing, from in the 1970s when the feds basically matches dollar-for-dollar everything the provinces spent.
Sure - it was true until the mid 1970s. The 50/50 split was a talking point for trying to get more funding from the feds.

In the 1975 budget, in regard to hospital and medical care insurance, the Minister of Finance, John Turner, said "even after the development of these plans as mature systems, the annual increase in their cost has on average run well ahead of the growth of national income. These cost trends are due in part to the basic nature of health care; but the statutory rigidity of the programs, the lack of national standards, and the open-ended nature of cost-sharing arrangements with the provinces has made it almost impossible to achieve effective cost planning or control. Last year, for example, federal contributions to the provinces in respect of these two programs had to be increased by 19.8 per cent over the previous year."

And from then on it hasn't been 50/50 - but as the news research showed, the federal government has increased its share more in the past 20 years.

More to the point for the upcoming election, Poilievre hasn't committed to continue to fund either pharmacare or the dental funding. His only health committment seems to be to try to get provinces to recognise overseas qualifications faster. There don't seem to be any more federal funds.
__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
     
     
  #1032  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 6:58 PM
Changing City's Avatar
Changing City Changing City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2016
Posts: 8,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
They have been discouraged their whole lives from having any national identity. They have been told by their Prime Minister for 10 years how awful their country is and how guilty they should feel about it. They have been unable to afford (or restricted by COVID) from travel and other life experiences. They can’t afford shit. It is not surprising they are not very patriotic.
For the past several years the Prime Minister has been arguing that the country isn't awful. This, on the other hand, has been the Conservative message since at least 2022.

__________________
Contemporary Vancouver development blog, https://changingcitybook.wordpress.com/ Then and now Vancouver blog https://changingvancouver.wordpress.com/
     
     
  #1033  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:16 PM
Wigs's Avatar
Wigs Wigs is offline
Great White North
 
Join Date: Nov 2003
Location: Niagara Region
Posts: 16,337
Quote:
Originally Posted by lio45 View Post
I’ve also been without a family doctor since mine retired several years ago.
That's what happened to me as well. While I moved across the country my Doctor in Ontario retired, when I moved back the backlog for Ontarians trying to find a family Doc was so long that I didn't even bother finding one initially.

Thank goodness for the local pharmacy owner building new medical office space and encouraging more Doctors to come to the area. It's quite convenient particularly for Seniors, or those without a car, having doctors offices next to a Life Labs, on top of a large pharmacy in the heart of town. One stop for one's needs. You'd admire the efficiency, lio. It's a win-win-win
__________________
"You can't have a strategy if you don't even have a policy"
     
     
  #1034  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:35 PM
Drybrain Drybrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 4,552
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
They have been discouraged their whole lives from having any national identity. They have been told by their Prime Minister for 10 years how awful their country is and how guilty they should feel about it. They have been unable to afford (or restricted by COVID) from travel and other life experiences. They can’t afford shit. It is not surprising they are not very patriotic.

Come on. No one is denying a national identity, nor does a healthy reckoning with a country's past sins preclude national pride (though I agree that in some circles, historical evils and present-day prejudices are wielded as proof that Canada is somehow beyond saving, a hopelessly corrupt colonial instution--but I have certainly never heard Trudeau say anything like that).

COVID restrictions lasted for like, a year. People very badly need to get over their hurt feelings about engaging in a collective effort to save lives, which is now getting to be pretty far in the rearview.

Cost of living, well, yeah, I get that. Too bad Poilievre is mostly good at peddling grievances over that, and appears to have very few practical solutions.
     
     
  #1035  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:36 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,608
Quote:
Originally Posted by acottawa View Post
They have been discouraged their whole lives from having any national identity. They have been told by their Prime Minister for 10 years how awful their country is and how guilty they should feel about it. They have been unable to afford (or restricted by COVID) from travel and other life experiences. They can’t afford shit. It is not surprising they are not very patriotic.
What on earth are you talking about? Which party is the one that keeps telling us "Canada is Broken" and people here on SSP telling us that "Canada will be destroyed if JT is elected" in 2019, then 2021.
     
     
  #1036  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:41 PM
Truenorth00 Truenorth00 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 28,934
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Is it the feds' dollar contribution that is increasing that is most important, or the share of health care spending that they are paying for?

https://policyoptions.irpp.org/magazines/september-2024/canada-health-transfer-provinces/
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I believe the allegation from the provinces is about the share that has been decreasing, from in the 1970s when the feds basically matches dollar-for-dollar everything the provinces spent.
"The Feds interfere way too much in provincial affairs."

"The Feds aren't fixing healthcare!"

Pick one.

The Feds pay enough to ensure the basic coverage required in the Canada Health Act is universally available across Canada. Anybody that wants more, should be looking at their provincial government.
     
     
  #1037  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:48 PM
jamincan jamincan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2020
Location: KW
Posts: 1,925
Joe Rogan and the Russian trolls keep telling them Canada is broken.
     
     
  #1038  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 7:50 PM
Marshsparrow Marshsparrow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,680
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City View Post
For the past several years the Prime Minister has been arguing that the country isn't awful. This, on the other hand, has been the Conservative message since at least 2022.

Poor Conservatives - they picked the wrong leader. His endorsements of Musk, Jones, Peterson... not good. His Chief of Staff and some MPs wearning MAGA hats off-putting.

He convinced so many that Canada is broken, Canada is garbage and people don't seem too tuned in to that message anymore.

He pivots to criticize Carney and of all things his shoes - at the same time he goes around in a $2.5K parka paid for by the taxpayer.

Conservatives better get their act together in a really big hurry!
     
     
  #1039  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 8:45 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,842
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
What on earth are you talking about? Which party is the one that keeps telling us "Canada is Broken" and people here on SSP telling us that "Canada will be destroyed if JT is elected" in 2019, then 2021.
There are 3 pages of apologies on the PM’s website, and those are just the ones they wrote a news release for.

https://www.canada.ca/en/privy-council/p...x&st1rt=0&langs=eng&cdn=pm&default_text=


He gives speeches like this at the UN, 90 percent of which is about how crappy Canada is.

https://www.pm.gc.ca/en/news/speeches/20...ress-72th-session-united-nations-general
     
     
  #1040  
Old Posted Feb 12, 2025, 8:54 PM
Hecate's Avatar
Hecate Hecate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 2,437
Let’s face it. The liberals got lucky with trump. Until him they were desperately trying to back track on the gas tax, and the immigration, all things the opposition has been hammering them about for the last several years. So because of trump we might end up being stuck with four more years of shit government. I hate that man.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:51 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.