Quote:
Originally Posted by Lakeofthewood
"Kavanagh proposed a motion that would have council bring Gougeon's report forward to the provincial auditor general. It failed on a tie at committee, though council will still have the opportunity to take it back up."
It's stuff like this that blows my mind about our city council. What possible reason can you have to vote against taking this further to the provincial AG? If there's a hint of lying or corruption, we should be rooting it out. And how much effort would this even take to do? Write a letter? Just continuously disappointing.
|
It was the same when some Councillors wanted to look into the O-Train fiasco. Watson Club voted against. When the Province picked it up, Watson Club's response was "see, good thing we didn't do it because now we're saving money" to save face. Voted against transparency is usually a sign of protecting your rear end.
Threaded Mode