HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1061  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2022, 1:21 PM
OTSkyline OTSkyline is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 2,825
Great to see underutilized empty parcels within the greenbelt (near retail & transit) being redeveloped too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1062  
Old Posted Jan 14, 2023, 7:47 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,645


[July 2022] 1890, 1900 & 1290 Walkley Road, 2425 Don Reid Drive, 2502 & 2510 St. Laurent Boulevard, 2990 & 3000 Conroy Road was purchased by Claridge Homes (Walkley) Inc. from Loblaw Properties Ltd. for $15,000,000 or $1,021,103 per acre. It is zoned General Mixed Use.

http://juteaujohnsoncomba.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/01/September-2022-Newsletter-July-Sales.pdf
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1063  
Old Posted Jan 16, 2023, 9:04 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Claridge Homes is proposing to construct a planned-unit development at 2510 St. Laurent Boulevard, consisting of 192 back-to-back townhomes and 36 townhomes on private streets. A portion of the Subject Site will be dedicated as a public park. The proposed development will be accessed from Don Reid Drive and St. Laurent Boulevard.

Development application:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-22-0101/details

Location:



Siteplan:

At least build mid-rises along Walkley and the other edges, add a retail space or two.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1064  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2023, 3:29 PM
waterloowarrior's Avatar
waterloowarrior waterloowarrior is offline
National Capital Region
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 9,254
Cardinal Creek South
https://v2.ottwatch.ca/devapp/D02-02-22-0107

304 singles, 276 townhomes, 10 semi detached, 168 back townhomes, 6.1 acres of Parkland, 2 school sites comprising of 13.9 acres, stormwater management facility 4.9 acres in size

Uniform subdivision in Manotick
https://v2.ottwatch.ca/devapp/D07-16-22-0026

The proposed development is a 147-unit low-rise residential subdivision consisting of freehold single-detached, semi-attached, and townhouse dwellings on a network of local streets accessed via Bankfield Road, two park blocks, and several open space blocks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1065  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2023, 3:55 PM
shelltime shelltime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2021
Posts: 34
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
At least build mid-rises along Walkley and the other edges, add a retail space or two.
The Geotech report refers to a 6 storey building along Walkley
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1066  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2023, 11:41 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,682
I’ve always been wondering: where are the lakes in “Kanata Lakes”?
The only “sizeable” enclosed waterbody that I can see on the map is Beaver Pond.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1067  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2023, 2:59 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
I’ve always been wondering: where are the lakes in “Kanata Lakes”?
The only “sizeable” enclosed waterbody that I can see on the map is Beaver Pond.
These suburban developments often refer to geological features that don't exist. Lakes, creeks, meadows, woods, hill, you name it. In this case, they may be referring to puddles within golf courses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1068  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2023, 4:59 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,075
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
These suburban developments often refer to geological features that don't exist. Lakes, creeks, meadows, woods, hill, you name it. In this case, they may be referring to puddles within golf courses.
And history that doesn't exist, or is spurious.

I'm just waiting for some sprawloper to combine the geology and fake history into one meta-tackiness.

Ordovician Towne

The Residences at Granytte Pointe

Precambrian Farms
__________________
___
Enjoy my taxes, Orleans (and Kanata?).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1069  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 4:05 PM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 565
300 and 425 Goulborn Forced Road / kanata lakes/ the pond development /KNL phase 9

https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-23-0032/details

Application to reduce the driveways from 4.5m down to 3m. So, that driveway will do a whole lot of nothing? The chart shows it's 4.56m to the street; however, that'd suck to have your car there come winter!

They are also asking to reduce the setback to the train tracks which seems fine.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1070  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 6:56 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,971
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawacurious View Post
300 and 425 Goulborn Forced Road / kanata lakes/ the pond development /KNL phase 9

https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-23-0032/details

Application to reduce the driveways from 4.5m down to 3m. So, that driveway will do a whole lot of nothing? The chart shows it's 4.56m to the street; however, that'd suck to have your car there come winter!

They are also asking to reduce the setback to the train tracks which seems fine.
Width or length?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1071  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 9:24 PM
Sauvanto Sauvanto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2021
Posts: 54
Pretty embarrassing suburban development considering Kanata North is supposed to go the route of "walkable" and "15 minute" or whatnot...

A bunch of cul-de-sacs with no pedestrian paths out, overly wide street, mega wide intersection with smooth with high curvature turns to increase vehicle speed, no mixed low density commercial for amenities and shopping, no planned access to the March BRT, the list goes on... Truly the pinnacle of "you don't want to live downtown, then screw you, get a car"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1072  
Old Posted May 30, 2023, 11:10 PM
vtecyo vtecyo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Width or length?
On page 10 of the application it looks like the current design is 4.56m to the edge of the city right of way - i.e. the official lot line - but not to the actual street. The right of way in their examples appears to be another 4.5m to 5m long. http://webcast.ottawa.ca/plan/All_Image%...tification%20Report%20D02-02-23-0032.PDF

I can only assume they would never build a 3m long driveway in the suburbs - as even quite small cars are over 4m long. That is unless they're actually trying to force the eventual homeowners to actually park in their own garage.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1073  
Old Posted May 31, 2023, 2:44 AM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 565


Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Width or length?
Length. Looks like vtecyo is right. Shouldn't the driveway then appear as 3m in this image instead?

Last edited by rocketphish; May 31, 2023 at 3:12 AM. Reason: Fixed invalid image link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1074  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2023, 2:54 AM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 565
I was reading this one and saw the development across the road in the first photo above. Perhaps 905-927 march road? Any ideas what that development is called? Couldn't find it on here or on Google.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1075  
Old Posted Jun 1, 2023, 9:50 PM
vtecyo vtecyo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 328
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ottawacurious View Post
I was reading this one and saw the development across the road in the first photo above. Perhaps 905-927 march road? Any ideas what that development is called? Couldn't find it on here or on Google.
There are a couple of dev apps for 927 March Rd:
Official Plan Amendment:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D01-01-20-0027/details

Plan of Subdivision:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D07-16-20-0034/details

Zoning By-law Amendment:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-20-0138/details

I don't see anything on the forum - so maybe this needs it's own thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1076  
Old Posted Jun 2, 2023, 11:32 AM
Ottawacurious Ottawacurious is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2022
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 565
Quote:
Originally Posted by vtecyo View Post
There are a couple of dev apps for 927 March Rd:
Official Plan Amendment:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D01-01-20-0027/details

Plan of Subdivision:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D07-16-20-0034/details

Zoning By-law Amendment:
https://devapps.ottawa.ca/en/applications/D02-02-20-0138/details

I don't see anything on the forum - so maybe this needs it's own thread.
Thanks for that! Found Brigil website for 927 March Rd as well: Nothing on it yet.
https://www.brigil.com/en/projects-in-development/march-road
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1077  
Old Posted Oct 19, 2023, 1:45 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,645
ClubLink clears another legal hurdle to contentious housing development
Group fighting the proposed build on a golf course says it's 'not done'

Elyse Skura · CBC News
Posted: Oct 19, 2023 4:00 AM EDT | Last Updated: 3 hours ago




ClubLink is now one step closer to replacing the Kanata Golf and Country Club with 1,480 housing units — a proposal that prompted a maelstrom of local opposition and a failed attempt by the City of Ottawa to argue its case at the Supreme Court.

Central to the debate is a 1981 agreement to protect "open space."

The City won the court challenge in this years-long legal odyssey. An Ontario Supreme Court ruling reversed that decision in favour of owner ClubLink, finding the corporation shouldn't be "saddled with a perpetual obligation" to run a golf course.

Friday's decision expanded on that ruling, declaring more aspects of the agreement "inoperable."

"It's clearly very disappointing," said Barbara Ramsay, chair of the Kanata Greenspace Protection Coalition. "It's a complicated problem, a really complicated problem."

Whether this is the final chapter of this particular dispute is unclear, but Ramsay definitively stated people in Kanata are not done fighting.

The pre-amalgamation City of Kanata entered into a series of agreements with former owner Campeau Corporation in the 1980s, which laid out rules to incorporate a golf course to align with rules dictating that 40 per cent remain open space.

The latest decision stated the "original intent" of these documents left the door open to future development.

Included in the 54-page decision were copies of the agreements, with all references to future operations on the golf course and the 40 per cent rule crossed out.

Justice Marc Labrosse invited parties to write to him if there's a dispute on how to interpret his findings.

City solicitor David White said his department is reviewing the decision, along with external counsel, and will provide a detailed report to councillors "in the coming days." A lawyer for ClubLink declined to comment.

When it announced the development in 2018, the corporation stated that golf courses are struggling to exist in Ottawa's oversaturated market because of rising maintenance costs.

As an intervener on the case, the greenspace coalition is not in a position to continue this particular legal battle.

But Ramsay said the community has other irons in the fire.

People who live in the hundreds of homes bordering the course worry the area cannot handle this kind of sharp intensification, she said, especially when it comes to stormwater management.

Right now water from the surrounding community drains into the course's permeable land, said Ramsay. Once the area is regraded, she worries that water will flow back into people's homes.

Given recent environmental concerns, Ramsay said ears are now open to the argument.

"In 2018, all we heard was criticism that it was a NIMBY [or, not in my backyard] argument," he said. "It's never been a NIMBY argument. It has been an argument about a violation of a strategically created and planned community."

https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/cl...ontentious-housing-development-1.7000521
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1078  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2023, 10:38 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,645
City plans to fight Kanata Lakes development ruling
Not just about golf: Kanata greenspace supporters say top issue in redevelopment battle is actually stormwater

Gord Holder • Postmedia
Published Nov 01, 2023 • Last updated 1 hour ago • 4 minute read


The city will appeal an Ontario Superior Court decision that had opened the door for Kanata Lakes Golf and Country Club owner ClubLink corporation to develop the site with 1,500 new homes, according to Kanata North Coun. Cathy Curry.

ClubLink has been notified of the decision and the appeal must be filed before November 30.

Curry says the protection of green space, as well as remaining forest, is a vital concern for the community.

“The City has to look at things that really affect surrounding residents, and some of those are our policies and how we build, develop and plan,” Curry said in a telephone interview. “And the city’s constant concern here is the stormwater.”

Curry says the original contract with developer Campeau called for 60 per cent of the entire property to be used for development, with the other 40 per cent mandated to be used as green space which is “all rock and not great conditions for building.”

That 40 per cent was used as the stormwater management plan for the houses that would be built on the rest of the site. The water then funnelled to the golf course lands, which eventually ended up in the beaver pond on the golf course property, on to Kizell Creek, to the Kizell municipal drain and ultimately to the Ottawa River.

Curry says ClubLink now wants to rip up the plan because they’ve yet to issue a stormwater plan that works. She says an adjoining Urbandale property has also been trying for 18 years to develop an appropriate stormwater plan.

“It’s a considerable problem to have houses in an area flooded,” Curry said.

The earlier Superior Court decision argued that ClubLink shouldn’t be “saddled with a perpetual obligation” to operate a golf course. Justice Marc Labrosse said some other sections of the original 1981 agreement that set aside 40 per cent of the Kanata Lakes property for green space were “inoperable.”

That agreement was between Campeau, developer and original owner of the golf course, and the City of Kanata, which was amalgamated into the City of Ottawa in 2001. ClubLink, which purchased the land in 1996, filed its redevelopment application with the City of Ottawa in 2018, but the planning committee rejected it in 2020. Legal action began.

A decision in the city’s favour was overturned by the Court of Appeal for Ontario, and the Supreme Court of Canada rejected the municipality’s application for leave to appeal again, sending the matter back to Superior Court. Three days of hearings occurred in September 2022, leading to Labrosse’s October 2023 ruling.

Curry has a counter-argument for those who suggest more development will bring more property tax dollars. She says in order to make the development happen, the city would need to replace all the existing sewage and stormwater sewers. City councils have been consistent in their opposition.

“Each mayor has said ‘absolutely not,’ the planning department has said ‘absolutely not’ and the community is starting to realize that this isn’t city waffling over wondering what they should do,” Curry said. “The city each time has come out firmly against this development.”

Barbara Ramsay, chair of the Kanata Greenspace Protection Coalition, says the issue is about far more than golf. She says there’s more awareness of the importance of stormwater management, given the changing environment and the intensity of storms. Echoing Curry, she says ClubLink has not shown how they will manage the stormwater system.

“When you take land, in this case 175 acres of fully permeable land at the head of a stormwater management system, and suddenly make it impermeable by filling it with concrete and homes, that water has to go somewhere,” Ramsay said.

“That’s really the core, the heart of the argument. As much as people like to grasp the golf course issue, it’s not a golf issue at all.”

In addition, she says there’s a serious public safety risk surrounding potential mercury contamination on the site, identified by consultants working for ClubLink on its development application.

According to Ramsay, the contamination likely resulted when mercury-laden fungicides were applied to the golf course turf from its early days starting as a nine-hole layout in the 1960s. The use of mercury in fungicides was banned in Canada in the 1990s.

“They identified mercury contamination on the golf course beyond residential safety limits, so it’s not just a little bit of mercury. It is not suitable for residential development in its present form, which means all of the land, and because the contamination is widespread, all of the land would need remediation.”

The greenspace coalition was not party to the Campeau-Kanata/Ottawa agreement, so, although it gained intervenor status in court, it does not have standing to appeal the Superior Court ruling. That responsibility rests with the city.

However, the coalition has started action regarding what it describes as a restrictive covenant ClubLink signed when it purchased the course in 1996.

According to Ramsay, it features a commitment from ClubLink not to re-grade the property or to change its stormwater management function.
Ramsay says the Superior Court decision “doesn’t stop us from pursuing that application.”

It’s not about golf, she says.

“But we do want the right preserved to access and use that space when it’s not being used as a golf course,” Ramsay said. “And that right, as we’ve said many, many times, is registered on the title of every residential lot in Kanata Lakes.”

https://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/city-plans-to-fight-kanata-lakes-development-ruling
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1079  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2023, 7:57 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 28,971
City has no chance to win this. They are just wasting time and money.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1080  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2023, 4:03 AM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
City has no chance to win this. They are just wasting time and money.
Maybe but it just seems wrong to allow developers to knowingly flood other peoples homes without any recourse or compensation.
__________________
Pronouns: He/Him/His
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Suburban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.