HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Oct 20, 2020, 9:19 PM
BAKGUY BAKGUY is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,433
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
TNS II ranks #9 on the diagram, so if Wawanesa is taller than it has to be at least in 9th place. The question is whether it will be tall enough to surpass MTS Place and CMHR to jump up to 7th. Just eyeballing it, I would have to imagine it will exceed MTS Place which is (again, according to the diagram) as tall as TNS II. But it isn't clear whether it will hit the 100 m height of CMHR.

But that said, this is just going by the diagrams and I'm not sure how accurate that information is. According to the thread title, TNS II is 86.9 m but the diagram puts it between the 94 m Fort Garry Place and the 96 m MTS Place.

Man, it's been a long time since I've had a good discussion like this about heights and rankings
Same here.
I love to see the once in a blue moon race for top 10 in the city. lol.
I have always been fascinated by skyscrapers and architecture.
I do still appreciate older buildings with nice detailing as well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.