HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Apr 15, 2015, 7:21 PM
mr1138 mr1138 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 1,166
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
Welcome to the forum.

We don't like parking podiums because they harm the walkability of the street. Pedestrians need things to be visually interesting, or a sidewalk feels barren and dangerous, and therefore people drive instead of walk. That's why Larimer Square is a nicer place to walk than, say, Court Place.

Parking garages aren't the worst option. They're much better than surface parking, and some garages are better than others. But it's a very dubious claim that they're "more green" than underground parking. By making the street less walkable, they push people into pollution-spewing cars over the entire life of the building, and that almost surely overrides whatever marginal reduction in emissions might be saved during construction.

But a building with a parking podium is better than no building at all, so as long as we take good efforts to make the podiums as attractive and interesting as possible, it's all good.
I completely agree with every point you make in your post, except possibly for the one I highlighted. I am not 100% convinced that these structures are "forever."

I think they are necessary for the time being, because of the reasons you state that they are a lot better option than surface parking, and because underground parking may oftentimes be cost prohibitive. And I suppose I can't predict the future better than anyone else... but if we use the past as an example, it would tell us that people's fundamental lifestyles oftentimes change faster than well built buildings.

Downtown will, no doubt, always need more parking than in the pre-automobile era; but I could see there being a day where it finally reaches a "critical mass" to support pedestrian and transit accessible lifestyles. If that point ever comes, and if it makes economic sense, there is no reason structurally that these couldn't be the adaptive reuse projects of the next generation. I've seen a lot stranger structures than these adapted for modern uses. Solidly constructed, and often occupying floors 2-6ish, this could actually be prime square footage if the parking ever becomes less of a commodity. Just my 2 cents on the matter.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.