HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2014, 4:08 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,793
Quote:
Originally Posted by DZH22 View Post
I think using 100m is too short for most larger cities. They are barely visible from a distance. Larger towers define and bring focal points to their respective skylines. You could add 50 towers between 100-105m to Toronto's skyline (without the rest of the projects) and people would wonder why Toronto stopped building anything. In Toronto's case, 1 supertall would do more for the skyline than those 50 buildings, but that kind of thing just isn't reflective by using such a low benchmark as the measurement.
I think 1 supertall would effectively be lost in Toronto while 50 buildings a bit over 100m would make a huge impact.
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:06 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.