L.A. backs $2.6 billion Convention Center expansion, amid major warnings about the cost
David Zahniser, Noah Goldberg
Los Angeles Times
September 19, 2025
- Los Angeles City Council voted 11-2 to approve a $2.6 billion Convention Center expansion despite warnings about serious financial risks.
- The project could drain over $100 million annually from the city’s general fund, which pays for police, firefighters and other essential services.
- Construction must begin immediately to meet the 2028 Olympics deadline, when the facility will host judo, gymnastics and other competitions.
L.A. political leaders took what their own policy experts called a risky bet on Friday, and agreed to pour billions of dollars into the city’s aging convention center in the hope that it will breathe new life into a struggling downtown and the region’s economy. In an 11-2 vote, the City Council approved a $2.6 billion expansion of its Convention Center, despite warnings from their own advisers that the project will draw taxpayer funds away from essential city services for decades to come.
The risks don’t stop there. If the Convention Center expansion experiences major construction delays, the project’s first phase may not be finished in time for the 2028 Olympic and Paralympic Games, when the facility is set to host judo, gymnastics and other competitions. That, in turn, could leave the city vulnerable to financial penalties from the committee organizing the event, according to the city’s policy analysts.
Those warnings did not discourage Mayor Karen Bass and a majority of the council, who said Friday that the project will create thousands of jobs and boost tourism and business activity, making the city more competitive on the national stage. “If we’re not here to believe in ourselves, who’s going to believe in us?” said Councilmember Adrin Nazarian, who represents part of the San Fernando Valley. “If we don’t invest in ourselves today, how are we going to be able to go and ask the major investors around the world to come in and invest in us?”
. . . .