Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW
|
Except it is a surprise and very unpleasant one. I've been attending their public "consultation" events since I moved back to Edmonton in 2018. At one, I asked if they were truly serious about having an at-grade crossing at 109 St and 104 Avenue--one of the busiest and most accident-prone vehicular intersections in the city (due mainly to motorists racing the left-turn signal). The people running the booth sort of giggled since they must have thought I was trying to entertain them instead of asking a serious question.
They ensured us that the plan was only a draft and that the consultation would fix problems such as running a train pell-mell straight down the middle of the street.
They didn't take any of the consultation measures seriously and people in the area are still woefully uninformed about the tramway. Go to any event in Oliver and talk to people and they just don't know what it's going to look like. They won't read a PDF because they really don't think anybody's going to do what they're planning. They think it's going to have grade separation at the busiest intersections and crossing gates and other sensible engineering.
As for old folks dying before the project is live--that's not unlikely as an unstated part of the plan. But those who live in the area and walk to and from amenities know very well that older residents simply can't make it all the way across 104 Avenue using a walker within 21 seconds or whatever arbitrary crossing time they choose. Motorists are very patient and acknowledge that old people need more time to cross. Will the tram operators hold up the schedule and allow the little old lady to cross?
And the crossing promises to be even wider as they start laying track and widening the thoroughfare.
PS: Seniors avoid the LRT since they are defenseless against roving gangs of miscreants.