HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9161  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 5:22 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,501
Quote:
Originally Posted by YegFan View Post
And believe we get a lot of business travelers here. They may not be the Armani suits type, but we get business pax way more than you think.
Isn't international business travel YEG's Achilles' Heel? I hear that YEG's inability to fill business class seats is a significant impediment.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #9162  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 5:25 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
No. Try getting an upgrade from YEG...not very easy these days.

Sounds like you're just trying to stir up sh!t, since you can't provide any backing to your statements.
     
     
  #9163  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 5:34 PM
tuffyy's Avatar
tuffyy tuffyy is offline
Sand kicking airport guy.
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Somewhere over the rainbow.
Posts: 1,750
A quick peek at the LHR flight over the next few weeks shows executive first looking pretty full to me...
     
     
  #9164  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 6:37 PM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,550
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Isn't international business travel YEG's Achilles' Heel? I hear that YEG's inability to fill business class seats is a significant impediment.
I would be curious to see how much of an impediment YYC would have in filling up flights with business class passengers let alone economy class passengers without AC connecting to AC flights and WS connecting to BA and KL flights.
     
     
  #9165  
Old Posted Nov 1, 2013, 7:32 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by LO 044 View Post
I would be curious to see how much of an impediment YYC would have in filling up flights with business class passengers let alone economy class passengers without AC connecting to AC flights and WS connecting to BA and KL flights.
Absolutely correct.
     
     
  #9166  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 2:40 PM
Cage Cage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2010
Location: YYC
Posts: 2,748
Quote:
Originally Posted by tuffyy View Post
A quick peek at the LHR flight over the next few weeks shows executive first looking pretty full to me...
Quote:
Originally Posted by dansk View Post
No. Try getting an upgrade from YEG...not very easy these days.

Sounds like you're just trying to stir up sh!t, since you can't provide any backing to your statements.
Its shoulder season and implementation of winter schedule has reduced frequency on the YEG-LHR run. However an analysis of R class (upgrade booking window) for AC898 compared to AC850 and AC854 shows that its easier for lower level Altitude members (E50k) to get an upgrade on A898. Talking with a few AC Altitude Elites from YYC and YVR also confirms this analysis.
Over the next few days AC 898 and 899 are J5 or greater on the three days per week the flight operates. Gate upgrades will fill up the J cabin. It should be noted that first two weeks of November are one of the slowest periods for air travel, my upgrades on YYC-IAH are likely to clear with UA although I am only lowly Premier Silver member that should be expecting E+ and maybe a middle seat E+ at that.
     
     
  #9167  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 5:50 PM
dansk's Avatar
dansk dansk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 1,290
Another interesting read:
As an Edmontonian, I was very disappointed with Air Canada's decision to suspend its one international service out of Edmonton International Airport - their London Heathrow flight

As a former director of corporate planning and member of the executive committee of Air Canada, and as the founding chairman of Edmonton Airports, I find it difficult to accept Air Canada's explanation for their decision.

With the exception of a small number of very high density routes such as New York to London, virtually all other route segments depend on connecting as well as origin/destination traffic. Air Canada has, for a number of years, pursued a proactive strategy to maximize connecting traffic through Calgary at the expense of Edmonton.

http://www.edmontonjournal.com/opinion/Airline+treatment+Edmonton+perplexing/9115849/story.html
     
     
  #9168  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 5:57 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
Great opinion piece.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9169  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 6:42 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
There could not be a more credible person to speak on the issue and in support of Edmonton. Thank you Mr. Watson.
     
     
  #9170  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 7:15 PM
thegx thegx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 320
WestJet service this winter (November to April) increases from 298 flights per week to 355.

Some of the changes include:

Fort McMurray increasing from 14 to 19 per week. (+332 seats/week)
Regina increasing from 6 to 20 per week. (+744 seats/week)
Saskatoon increasing from 6 to 14 per week. (+266 seats/week)

Clearly, Encore is not detrimental to YEG, actually the opposite. More frequencies and more capacity.
     
     
  #9171  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 7:30 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
That is a lot of new capacity... Wow
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9172  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 7:47 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,246
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
That is a lot of new capacity... Wow
And all potentially connecting to Icelandair into UK and Europe and of course Iceland. WJ may strategically see this feeder opportunity...and are happy as heck simply being innocent enablers...and it works for us...at least starting March
     
     
  #9173  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 7:57 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,595
I wonder whether business class profits be enough to entice WestJet into wide body service to Europe? It might make sense to run a full joint venture between WestJet and Icelandair to allow WestJet to continue building up its domestic operations without further distractions. It would also own all the passenger data, and could decide if and when to introduce direct flights with existing customer already having experience booking European travel via WestJet.
     
     
  #9174  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 9:12 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,893
I decided to go for a drive to EIA today, for no reason other than because it will be the last chance for summer driving before the snow hits.

The hotel looks good, full stop. However, given the rad design of the new control tower, I would have preferred something much better than merely "good". And as Trekker pointed out, the ventilation ducts out front isn't the best usage of street/pedestrian-level interaction.

And is that really an elevated pedway connecting the hotel to the terminal? I didn't get a chance to look that closely.

I will pass final judgement when everything is fully completed.
     
     
  #9175  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2013, 9:52 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,024
'And is that really an elevated pedway connecting the hotel to the terminal? I didn't get a chance to look that closely.'

Yes
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #9176  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 12:46 AM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
'And is that really an elevated pedway connecting the hotel to the terminal? I didn't get a chance to look that closely.'

Yes
Yes, it is, but to my eye, it hasn't progressed in 2 months. What gives?
     
     
  #9177  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 12:49 AM
cyeg66's Avatar
cyeg66 cyeg66 is offline
Contôleur aérien YYC
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Really, really north Leduc
Posts: 1,302
Lightbulb

Quote:
Originally Posted by thegx View Post
WestJet service this winter (November to April) increases from 298 flights per week to 355.

Some of the changes include:

Fort McMurray increasing from 14 to 19 per week. (+332 seats/week)
Regina increasing from 6 to 20 per week. (+744 seats/week)
Saskatoon increasing from 6 to 14 per week. (+266 seats/week)

Clearly, Encore is not detrimental to YEG, actually the opposite. More frequencies and more capacity.
To be clear, these are most certainly not "net" increases, with 73G's being substituted by 2 Encore flights. A couple months back, Johnny Aussie summarized the totals quite concisely. It's a bump in seats, yes, but not as dramatic as you suggest, I think.
     
     
  #9178  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 1:18 AM
LO 044's Avatar
LO 044 LO 044 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,550
Yeah i thought the WS "increase" was explained a while back Johnny Aussie as well.
     
     
  #9179  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 1:52 AM
thegx thegx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 320
They most certainly are net increases.

Last winter both Regina and Saskatoon operated as 6 weekly 737s. This worked out to be 816 seats per week. (A little less to Saskatoon as it was a 737-600). This winter, WestJet Encore will operate 3 daily 78-seat Q400s to Regina and 2 daily Q400s to Saskatoon. About 1638 seats to Regina and 1092 to Saskatoon. Net increase.

The daily Q400 to Fort McMurray is in addition to the two daily 737s. Nothing was replaced. Also a net increase.

Only Calgary and Grande Prairie have seen seat decreases as a result of Encore.
     
     
  #9180  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2013, 2:20 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,729
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
And all potentially connecting to Icelandair into UK and Europe and of course Iceland. WJ may strategically see this feeder opportunity...and are happy as heck simply being innocent enablers...and it works for us...at least starting March
Partnering with Icleandair to provide feed is good, however they also partner with BA and KLM out of Calgary.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:12 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.