Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
I think you are right to a point but our era is also one of Freudian narcissism of minor differences.
"I know a Brazilian who prefers baseball over soccer so based on this single exception it's false to claim that Brazilians are passionate about soccer."
Nothing is ever 100% but a big part of sociology and other such social sciences is based on what might call educated generalizations, even though yes these times abhor generalizations.
So if we wanna go all the way with the Freudian narcissism, then sure the anglosphere doesn't exist and neither does the western world for that matter.
|
I actually agree with this. Though the thing with the English-speaking world, given its size and gravity pull, is that you end up with a massive "in between" fringe of people who partake into this shared anglo-american culture to a significant extent, in addition to another. Certainly way larger than with other cultural spheres.
There are all sorts of reasons (some of them good, even) that thinking in terms of this sort of "purity scale" is frowned upon. But if we go back to trying to classify countries, I think it helps to focus on the elites -- in which case, I would argue that Canada is, in fact, as solidly "anglosphere" as any of them, Quebec-born PMs notwithstanding.
As an aside to your other point on Quebec being more exposed, and since I know you'll get a kick out of it -- I was at a wedding in Estrie on Saturday, about 80 guests, 95% Qc francophones. And the main convo topic was... the superbowl.