Quote:
Originally Posted by isaidso
Are you implying that he is incapable of being impartial? No city will ever match Montreal when it comes to the grandeur of its pre-war built form. It's not just Montrealers that recognize that.
|
What exactly do you mean by "prewar built form"? There are dozens of cities around the world that have at least as much prewar or colonial architecture. In Canada, Montreal certainly has a number of buildings of tremendous historical value - especially colonial architecture of the eighteenth and nineteenth centuries. After all, Montreal was the primary economic centre for 150ish years. Of course, I'm not saying it's day has passed; it's still a vital city in Canada. Montreal has added many, many iconic buildings to its skyline since WWII.
Pretty well every city in Canada that was a big city pre-war maintains a lot of interesting relics. Toronto has beautiful Victorian row houses and factories. The Maritimes, Newfoundland, and Quebec have tons of interesting colonial and hundred-year old buildings. Calgary, Edmonton, and a handful of smaller prairie cities have some beautiful Beaux Arts sandstone buildings. Vancouver has a ton of surviving Victorian and Art Deco buildings. Winnipeg has some of Canada's best Chicago style buildings and tons of elegant prewar houses. Ottawa and Kingston: don't get me started. There are also plenty of one-off beauties that define other towns, such as the Banff Springs Hotel or old stone houses of Hamilton and Niagara.
Montreal's great and so are other cities. What is everyone fighting about?