Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
One factor that dampened Atlantic Canada was the intrusion of Maine. If the top half of that state had ended up in Canada, it would have provided a more direct line to the Canadian heartland.
|
It's pretty rare for a country to have an region (not just a tiny area) separated by protrusions of another country like that.
This territory in between was contested and Britain occupied the Penobscot river in Maine (Bangor), controlling everything to the east during the War of 1812. And "Britain" in this case largely meant forces based in Halifax in the case of Maine, with Maritimers forming a portion of the troops and officers.
In those days Britain had a global empire and traded territory back and forth in treaties without caring much about the locals. That phenomenon was a cause of why Americans separated in the first place. New Englanders conquered Louisbourg then Britain gave it back to France in exchange for land elsewhere in the world. New Englanders ended up having to re-conquer Louisbourg (nominally "British" forces, but in large part actually New Englanders).
Another factor for Maine is that back in the 1800's the waterways were seen as important. Pre-railway-era observers would have considered the St. Lawrence the shortest path between Canada and the Maritimes, with the northern forests of Maine being irrelevant. The trade between the Maritimes and UK or US was also more important than the Maritimes and Canada in those days, so even just ending hostilities with New England would have been a higher priority than getting some forests in Maine.