HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2181  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 12:07 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
There are office buildings in Vancouver that look far better than the one you posted, that may in fact be the ugliest!
For example:
http://duetvictoria.com/blog/a-tale-of-two-firms/
I tried to pic one that looked fairly average using the diagrams page. Maybe not the best place to judge appearances, but an easy way to get names.

As for that building, don't like it. Give me a commie block any day.
     
     
  #2182  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 12:09 AM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,028
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
A nuisance with an uncanny knack for squeezing the life out of everything it touches that is not a park?
So basically just a bureaucracy?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
As for that building, don't like it. Give me a commie block any day.
You're nuts! lol
__________________
Git'er done!
     
     
  #2183  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 12:30 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
^ Head over to the Ottawa forum and search "NCC".
     
     
  #2184  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:47 AM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashok View Post
If you are refering to the Parlaiment area, I diagree - we need to try very hard to keep a very unique identity around the parlaiment. Imagine this area, but just much much larger, with beautiful gothic buildings like below.

Nope..I was referring to the other 99% of the government buildings where the other 99% of civil servants work..

Fantastic shot of Parliament Hill btw
     
     
  #2185  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 2:35 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
So basically just a bureaucracy?
The NCC is the biggest landowner in the region but what it controls in terms of planning is quite limited. It is mostly related to protecting sightlines, the odd beautification projects in certain specific areas, etc.

Aside from the land that it owns itself, it has almost no power to get Ottawa or Gatineau to do stuff if they don't want to.

It used to organize events like festivals but recently it's mostly just been responsible for Canada Day.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #2186  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 2:48 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
be nice to the crackheads
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 12,653
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ashok View Post
Are you kidding me? Wow!
     
     
  #2187  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 3:02 AM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,015
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
The NCC is the biggest landowner in the region but what it controls in terms of planning is quite limited. It is mostly related to protecting sightlines, the odd beautification projects in certain specific areas, etc.

Aside from the land that it owns itself, it has almost no power to get Ottawa or Gatineau to do stuff if they don't want to.

It used to organize events like festivals but recently it's mostly just been responsible for Canada Day.

I thought that the NCC was also responsible for Winterlude?..Maybe it has changed in last 8.0 years or so.
     
     
  #2188  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 3:38 AM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Vancouver


Last edited by Prometheus; Nov 5, 2014 at 3:53 AM.
     
     
  #2189  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 5:30 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Hamilton, like Quebec City, will never have a Winnipeg style skyline. Though for different reasons. Quebec City has a much older core, so skyline building there will be minimal. Hamilton meanwhile just isn't an office tower type of city. Hospitals, post-secondary education, and factories are Hamilton's main job sources (probably retail as well), those don't tend to fill office towers. Hamilton should work on maintaining it's current haphazard mess of highrises. Plus residential skylines are always better (all else being equal).
Never is a strong word. Hamilton hasn't been that kind of city for the most part, but that's no indication of what it may become. It all depends on how Hamilton's economy continues its slow but steady restructuring - the city has one of the most diverse economies in the country now. It also depends how the market in the GGH evolves, and how employment intensification occurs (the Growth Plan isn't just about residential growth). The likelihood of many prominent office towers going up in the core is low, but if the downtown employment picture continues to develop and vacancy rates continue their downward trend I could see some being built over the next decade or two. So I disagree with you (about Quebec City too, by the way)

Not sure what you mean by "maintaining" though - would you like the skyline to stay as it is, or do you want more added to it but of the same type of stock we have today?

Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
I'm with you 100% > it's definitely worth a visit. But the whole 'before I die' thing does sounds pretty funny; we're not talkin' about the Roman Ruins here.
No, but considering I've never been to Winnipeg, have little reason at the moment beyond personal interest to visit, and that statistically speaking I've entered the latter half of my lifespan, it seemed fitting. (and it's a long list of places I'd like to see before... you know )
     
     
  #2190  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:24 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
Never is a strong word. Hamilton hasn't been that kind of city for the most part, but that's no indication of what it may become. It all depends on how Hamilton's economy continues its slow but steady restructuring - the city has one of the most diverse economies in the country now. It also depends how the market in the GGH evolves, and how employment intensification occurs (the Growth Plan isn't just about residential growth). The likelihood of many prominent office towers going up in the core is low, but if the downtown employment picture continues to develop and vacancy rates continue their downward trend I could see some being built over the next decade or two. So I disagree with you (about Quebec City too, by the way)

Not sure what you mean by "maintaining" though - would you like the skyline to stay as it is, or do you want more added to it but of the same type of stock we have today?
Well the never was in part hopeful thinking.

As for maintaining, I want addition, but of similar scaling and residential nature. Also the spread of plenty of towers out across the city. Also I think keeping most of the city's towers shorter than the escarpment (which is still a decent height).
     
     
  #2191  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:27 PM
SignalHillHiker's Avatar
SignalHillHiker SignalHillHiker is offline
I ♣ Baby Seals
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Location: Sin Jaaawnz, Newf'nland
Posts: 36,220
Great pic of Ottawa. Tried to find some more views of the skyline.

This one was interesting, to me, at least. I never knew it was that big:

Video Link
__________________
Note to self: "The plural of anecdote is not evidence."
     
     
  #2192  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:49 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post


I've heard the strong federalism of Gatineau means no one wants to remove them from Gatineau.
Quebec would never give it up either as it's the third-largest metro in the province and one of the richer regions.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #2193  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:53 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Razor View Post
I thought that the NCC was also responsible for Winterlude?..Maybe it has changed in last 8.0 years or so.
Yeah, at some point they got out of Winterlude (though they do collaborate a lot as most the sites are NCC-owned, namely Confederation and Jacques-Cartier parks, and of course the Rideau Canal).

Winterlude is run by its own private "festival association" of some kind now. It might be non-profit I think...
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #2194  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:54 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
     
     
  #2195  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 1:59 PM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,447
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
As for maintaining, I want addition, but of similar scaling and residential nature. Also the spread of plenty of towers out across the city. Also I think keeping most of the city's towers shorter than the escarpment (which is still a decent height).
I think most new residential will be in the 20-30 storey range, a few taller, plenty more shorter and mid-rise.

I'd love to see some office buildings 30+ floors tall. 40+ even better . I really believe in residential intensification downtown but it needs balance with commercial development to have a good mix of live-work in the core.

Hopefully the city sustains the promising change that's begun.
     
     
  #2196  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 3:03 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,792
Quote:
Originally Posted by ScreamingViking View Post
I think most new residential will be in the 20-30 storey range, a few taller, plenty more shorter and mid-rise.

I'd love to see some office buildings 30+ floors tall. 40+ even better . I really believe in residential intensification downtown but it needs balance with commercial development to have a good mix of live-work in the core.

Hopefully the city sustains the promising change that's begun.
Commercial highrises just get in the way. You don't need a view out the window while you're working in a cubicle. A view outside your apartment is much better.

Commercial midrises are good, they add density without getting in the way.
     
     
  #2197  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 7:58 PM
Surrealplaces's Avatar
Surrealplaces Surrealplaces is offline
Editor
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Cowtropolis
Posts: 20,207
     
     
  #2198  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 8:11 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
^ man, that building below the Calgary Tower on the lower right is ugly...
     
     
  #2199  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 9:09 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
     
     
  #2200  
Old Posted Nov 5, 2014, 9:35 PM
Ashok Ashok is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 602
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
So, in this picture, a lot of the buildings in the forefront are on a 'hill.' It gives the impression that the buildings in the back are much shorter than they really are.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:41 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.