Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
That did cause a double-take bit of hubris.
I wasn't sure if she was referring to a city-owned concrete plant or just assuming this would be a result of the private sector? The idea of 'manufacturing' efficiencies a bit hilarious especially since I can envision many different engineering challenges as they go, not to mention neighborhood objections.
|
That was a response to the City saying there is a “concrete shortage.” Which is nonsense unless you are buying it 10 yards at a time, like DOTI’s tiny sidewalk contractors do. Versus a project that needs 100,000 yards like a runway or a highway job. It’s a good quote I think - anybody who does major projects for a living would recognize what DOTI has been doing vs what DOTI would have to do going forward are apples and oranges. It’s the difference between bidding to Jim’s Concrete versus bidding to Kiewit (and having them subcontract half the installation to all of the Jims out there, and self-performing the rest).
By the way, CDOT publishes data on all of this. Jobs >$20 million average twice as many bidders as jobs <$10 million, and see lower unit prices. It’s not rocket science - it’s well known.
The City is grumpy about this initiative, but they do bundle for efficiencies too. Ask them what they’ve been telling the neighborhood-level project planning efforts - whatever they are calling that participatory budgeting initiative. They’ve been saying “try and find projects we can bundle with other projects (parks says this a lot), otherwise we can’t afford them.”
Pennsylvania’s rural bridge program is my personal favorite example. Same idea, a lot of the same challenges sidewalks face.
EDIT: Re: neighborhood objections… yes. Although DOTI already has a pretty brutal established approach on this - look at their website. They’ve been tearing up landscaping in the right of way for curb ramps for years.