Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
This is correct. There is certainly tons of culture produced in Toronto and Ontario, much of it refined and rich.
I think the point is more that so very little of it feels rooted in any way in the place that it originates from.
|
This is sort of the crux of it, I guess.
It comes down to what one
genuinely enjoys, and if that necessarily maps to a neat geographic area. Is culture such a narrow topic that only the certain markers (TV/movies/distinctively regional food/music/sports) are valid ones? Does an outdoorsy lifestyle matter, and is that distinctively
Canadian marker? Would we be better if we liked exclusively Canadian things, however one wants to define that? Can a Kiwi like Australian rules football and still be a Kiwi?
From this (albeit narrow) perspective, Anglo-Canada is America-lite with its own little quirks and seems to
genuinely enjoy being that. I suppose as long as we can have a serious conversation about the things that matter in this country and understand our context in that, my opinion is that Canadians can like the NFL all they want, if they want to.
People hated hipsters because there was no genuineness; it was all pretentiousness. Are they drinking Labatt 50 (or Pabst) because they genuinely enjoyed the taste, or was it the facade of anti-pretentiousness hiding pretentiousness? (Answer: of course it was them being pretentious and that's why they were hated)
We are status seeking animals, and the more we get mixed up in that, the more things get blurry.