Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
Yes we'll walk with a walk that is measured and slow,
and we'll go where the chalk-white arrows go,
for the children, they mark, and the children, they know,
the place where the sidewalk ends.
Credit Shel Silverstein
Sidewalks have only been a cause célèbre for about half a decade. Prior to that most people couldn't give two chits about sidewalks, especially those who live in suburban neighborhoods. BTW, the neighborhoods and areas that most could benefit from sidewalks already have them. That's not to say it shouldn't be an issue or that improvements couldn't be made.
I do get a kick out the the guy who walks along Colorado Blvd to demonstrate the lack of any sidewalk. Yet as much as this guy loves to walk he couldn't go one block over where he could peacefully walk along a neighborhood street?...
|
I'm totally with ya here. Sidewalks are the urbanist talking point du jour in Murica. Having lived in Europe for a time, where they are generally in much worse shape sidewalk/accessibility wise than us, people have empathy for their common human and make it work over there. They also have much more desirable livable places despite having abysmal sidewalk/accessibility infrastructure generally. There are a couple exceptions to that, but the vast majority of Europe has bad access (think a step into a building, steep sidewalk/road slopes, cobblestones, and skinny hallways in buildings).
Call me crazy, but cars can share roads with bikes and humans so long as those roads aren't designed like highways for only cars/trucks to go as fast as possible...oh wait, that's exactly what we do here we design high capacity highways for residential streets. Fire the entire traffic engineering department and stop letting the fire department have a say in city-building and in three decades we will have much more desirable places to live, albeit with some risk for more fire and accessibility that isn't perfect (which it isn't now so it really wouldn't be a disastrous result).