I would see this differently but you certainly raise valid questions
Quote:
Originally Posted by DenverInfill
We'll never know because critical thinking was never actually on the menu. The big takeaway the author seems to have is: suburbs happened!
|
You know how I love Context
but in this case there was no agenda; there were no judgments made or conclusions drawn beyond "suburbs happened." You are very correct in saying it's simply a collection of data. Therefor context wasn't needed.
But since we know (metro) Denver we are free to make whatever observations or judgments we care to. I'll start.
The most recent decade
saw an amazing move back to the city center. As a part of this phenomena, location became significantly more important especially for larger or more prominent tenants.
Previously as suburbs 'happened' it wasn't unusual to see some 'neighborhood' office space, usually Class B quality which for many 'neighborhood' CPA's, lawyers and misc small businesses this was fine and convenient.
More prominent suburban office space was sited in very few areas. For example, the Denver Tech Center vision started initially in the 1970's but blossomed in the 1980's. The SE metro has always been a favored area and the tech center headed south all the way to Meridian.
But over the last decade older suburban office space, especially Class B space has become less relevant. Partly this is due to a trend to consolidation of companies.
Feel free to add you own observations and thinking.