HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3961  
Old Posted Dec 19, 2020, 2:13 AM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by chowhou View Post
Rome wasn't built in a day.
But it certainly wasn't cancelled, scaled down, put in the limbo that is election season, studied so much that the studies are studied, and the like, right?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3962  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 3:16 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3963  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 3:39 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Reeeeeeeeeaaaaallllly not a fan of street LED lighting. Every street installation seems overdone and overamped. Oak and 12th, for example, literally hurts my eyes. I can't be the only one. Or am I just "special"?
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3964  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 4:36 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Reeeeeeeeeaaaaallllly not a fan of street LED lighting. Every street installation seems overdone and overamped. Oak and 12th, for example, literally hurts my eyes. I can't be the only one. Or am I just "special"?
It makes a huge difference on those horrible winter nights IMO. Feels safer as a pedestrian too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3965  
Old Posted Feb 17, 2021, 8:32 PM
MIPS's Avatar
MIPS MIPS is offline
SkyTrain Nut
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Kamloops
Posts: 2,071
It's a bit of an art choosing LED lights. There's a balance between per-luminaire cost, reliability (or how affordable it is to keep replacing ballasts which WILL fail before EOL) and lamp ageing. Most high output LED lamps will lose about 25% of their efficiency over ten years. More so faster if they are being overdriven.
Check out the LED lighting at the Shell at the corner of Hastings and Victoria. When that was new a little over a decade ago it was white, now it's got a very yellow tint.
The tunnel was originally fluorescent illuminated but converted to sodium I believe in the 70's?

BC Hydro has already announced they will be converting every streetlight in the province to LED over the next four years. Ministry of transportation and infrastructure are well underway already. In all over 110000 lights, not including municipal owned lights.
You bet your money these are going to be cheap and bright lights at the cost of reliability and things like glare and spectral color issues. (EG: https://www.bclocalnews.com/news/high-be...beach-streets-a-nightmare-for-residents/ )

Last edited by MIPS; Feb 17, 2021 at 8:54 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3966  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 12:35 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
I hope at least long-distance highways will have softer and warmer color tone not to be so hard and tiring on the eyes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3967  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 12:48 AM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,773
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Reeeeeeeeeaaaaallllly not a fan of street LED lighting. Every street installation seems overdone and overamped. Oak and 12th, for example, literally hurts my eyes.
Haven't seen Oak & 12th, but I like the other ones I've seen around - much less harsh and more natural in colour than sodium and especially mercury arc vapour lighting.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3968  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 2:12 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Reeeeeeeeeaaaaallllly not a fan of street LED lighting. Every street installation seems overdone and overamped. Oak and 12th, for example, literally hurts my eyes. I can't be the only one. Or am I just "special"?
You're not the only one. The street LEDs make my retinas burn. And don't get me started on LED headlights.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3969  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 2:20 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Yeah, somebody forgot to tell the City that LEDs are brighter and need to be dimmed.

At least they're deflected downward. Some cities' new streetlights are omnidirectional and shine right into your home.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3970  
Old Posted Feb 18, 2021, 3:13 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,427
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Great! But wonder why they don’t light up the rest of the highway? It’s pretty common for freeways in metro areas to have lighting
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3971  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2021, 6:31 AM
Bobert Bobert is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 249
Preload is being removed section by section south of the tunnel.

Anyone aware of what's happening?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3972  
Old Posted Feb 20, 2021, 6:45 PM
DIYer DIYer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 5
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bobert View Post
Preload is being removed section by section south of the tunnel.

Anyone aware of what's happening?
Looks like the preload will be used for hwy 91/17 project, see "Highway 99 Preload Transportation" in this page:
https://www2.gov.bc.ca/gov/content/trans...way-91-17-deltaport-construction-traffic
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3973  
Old Posted Feb 26, 2021, 3:52 AM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
You're not the only one. The street LEDs make my retinas burn. And don't get me started on LED headlights.
Holy moly. I drove the tunnel on the weekend and my god is that LED lighting overlamped. I had to put my sunshade down and because my dashboard lighting is light sensitive, it blazed to its highest setting, which it only does when I'm driving with the sun down low and directly ahead.

Slow clap, eco-friendly lighting. If the tunnel wasn't there, you could probably see the lighting from space.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3974  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2021, 5:10 AM
madog222 madog222 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 4,054
Environmental assessment amendment from February gives us a few more details.

To summarize:
-Dedicated southbound bus connection from Bridgeport (but no northbound direct connection?)
-Steveston Hwy overpass will be 4 lanes plus a left turn lane.
-Shoulder bus lanes extended South until Ladner Trunk Rd.

Quote:
• Improvement 1 – Bridgeport Road Bus Connection: Redirect southbound bus services from Sea Island Way to Bridgeport Road, and provide a transit-only connection southbound to the on-ramp to Highway 99.
• Improvement 2 – Highway 99 and 17A off-ramp widening: Extend and widen the northbound Highway 99 off-ramp approach to the Highway 17A intersection.
• Improvement 3 – Bus-on-shoulder transit lanes on Highway 99: Extend northbound and southbound bus-on-shoulder facilities south of Highway 17A.
• Improvement 4 – Steveston Highway Interchange: Replacement of the existing two-lane overpass structure at Steveston Highway and Highway 99 to accommodate two eastbound lanes and three westbound lanes (including a left turn lane), as well as improved connections to and from the overpass for vehicles, pedestrians and cyclists.
From the Massey Crossing site document library.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3975  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2021, 5:16 AM
Mininari Mininari is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Victoria (formerly Port Moody, then Winnipeg)
Posts: 2,446
Can we borrow a term from the building diagrams page and officially label this a "stale proposal"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3976  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2021, 6:28 AM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,902
So essentially outside of the tunnel minimal improvements to the corridor.

Continued use of the shoulder as a “bus lane.”

Minimal upgrades to the interchanges bookending the tunnel (essentially retaining the existing late 1950’s era designs) with only a single overpass being replaced.

I am sure the direct southbound bus connection from Bridgeport Station will be a Mickey Mouse bare bones connection that will pale in comparison to the cancelled project’s version.

Oh well, just build the tunnel then and hopefully another project later will upgrade the highway.

Of course in the end that will take two multi billion dollar projects (one for the tunnel and one for the highway) with a combined price tag likely double or triple that of the cancelled project. Politics!
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3977  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2021, 7:39 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
Of course in the end that will take two multi billion dollar projects (one for the tunnel and one for the highway) with a combined price tag likely double or triple that of the cancelled project. NDP Politics!
fixed that for you.

also, with this massively decreased scope, it is already projected to cost 1 billion more.

its a god damn joke.

we should just label this thread as "terrible, delayed, overpriced proposed"
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3978  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2021, 9:16 PM
cganuelas1995 cganuelas1995 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2017
Posts: 1,639
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
fixed that for you.

also, with this massively decreased scope, it is already projected to cost 1 billion more.

its a god damn joke.

we should just label this thread as "terrible, delayed, overpriced proposed"
By my calculations, if they demolished the tunnel and brought back the ferry, it would cost at least 10 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3979  
Old Posted Apr 22, 2021, 11:55 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by cganuelas1995 View Post
By my calculations, if they demolished the tunnel and brought back the ferry, it would cost at least 10 billion.
?

These aren’t imaginary figures, it is written in the official proposal itself that this tunnel option will cost at least 1 billion dollars more than the original cancelled plan while not involving any major highway corridor upgrades and a shoulder bus lane service that is a significant downgrade from the true centre lane rapid bus system that was originally to be built.

Not to mention the years of lost economic benefits of bei mg delayed for at least 5 to 6 years (more likely 10).

I think the original project would have been nearing completion now.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3980  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2021, 4:54 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Given the choice between the GMB and the Broadway and Langley SkyTrains, I'll take the SkyTrains. I don't think there was ever a possibility of getting all three at once.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:33 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.