HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9601  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 12:07 AM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,995
Skyline on March 5th



Source

The northwest side of downtown seems really underdeveloped from this angle.
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9602  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 12:38 AM
Comrade's Avatar
Comrade Comrade is offline
They all float down here
 
Join Date: Jan 2002
Location: Hair City, Utah
Posts: 9,611
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing View Post
The thing is, it isn't their house though and they knew that going in. Any renter that has tried made a rental house 'their own' are lying to themselves. These renters are demanding the right to essentially live in someone else's house forever at whatever low rent they have determined to be appropriate. Personally, I find that point of view outrageous and I suspect it will only make the situation worse for future renters in Utah.
It saddens me that you're more outraged over someone being outraged about the prospects of being homeless because it's becoming increasingly difficult to find affordable housing in Salt Lake than actually being outraged over the continued leveling of affordable options that are being replaced with condos and rental units that price out over half the city from the start.

That mindset is just so inhuman - especially during the worst pandemic (that is on going) in 100 years.

But you do you. I just hope you never find yourself in the position of losing everything and if you are: someone will have at least a tiny bit more humanity than you apparently have for people who are likely going to be homeless soon.

Then, I'm sure, you'll find a way to rant and bemoan the dirty homeless people crowding our beautiful streets without a hint of irony.

Good luck with that, man. I've said my peace on this argument. It's clear anything beyond this is irrelevant.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9603  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 1:46 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade View Post
It saddens me that you're more outraged over someone being outraged about the prospects of being homeless because it's becoming increasingly difficult to find affordable housing in Salt Lake than actually being outraged over the continued leveling of affordable options that are being replaced with condos and rental units that price out over half the city from the start.

That mindset is just so inhuman - especially during the worst pandemic (that is on going) in 100 years.

But you do you. I just hope you never find yourself in the position of losing everything and if you are: someone will have at least a tiny bit more humanity than you apparently have for people who are likely going to be homeless soon.

Then, I'm sure, you'll find a way to rant and bemoan the dirty homeless people crowding our beautiful streets without a hint of irony.

Good luck with that, man. I've said my peace on this argument. It's clear anything beyond this is irrelevant.
First, my statement still stands. When you are a RENTER, you are not the OWNER of a property. Acting and behaving as if you are is folly.

Second, the part you so conveniently left out of the quote was when I went on to say this:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing View Post
I abhor renting as a means of housing (especially for longer periods of time) to begin with. I personally think it is often a drain on our society and the least fortunate. That's why I posted that video a week ago describing how Singapore has dealt with their housing, resulting in over 90% of households owning their own property.

There is a rapidly growing long-term class divide between renters (who have little power, aren't able to build wealth through real estate, and whose rents continue to rise uncontrollably) and property owners, whose houses continue to gain or at least retain value, allowing them to build wealth which can then be leveraged.
The publicly funded housing solution in Singapore has had remarkable success, especially because they learned from the failures and potential pitfalls of public housing here in the United States. By making public housing geared towards home ownership rather than renting, Singapore helped lift millions of their citizens out of poverty. There was also some great suggestions made on the reddit post related to this that I thought may also act as a good model for projects replacing affordable housing going forwards.

My stance has always been that the model for housing people in the United States has clearly failed the moment we are living in. Additional actions are clearly necessary in order to provide more equitable housing. However, with things as they are, my final quote from that post still stands:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing View Post
All that said, preventing a development that would provide housing for hundreds of people for 7 households in utterly insane. We are in a genuine housing shortage crisis and this only makes the situation worse. So yes, I do think this is a good example for how anti-development sentiments are getting out of hand.
Housing isn't going to get cheaper because they kill the Kozo House project, it will only get worse, that much IS clear.

It has become obvious in the four years I have been posting here that your natural state, Comrade, is to be angry about something or other. That's fine. "You do you." But taking my comments without the full context is honestly lazy and beneath you. Unless you have legitimate solutions to offer, rather than simply attacking me for trying to offer one, I respectfully suggest you leave the rest of us out of it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9604  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 4:32 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Orlando View Post
Nice to see more dense infill. Although, the facade facing 4th is kind of deadly. The city shouldn't allow that much blank facade facing the principal street. That's just bad design.
An option for buildings that have less actual windows facing the street is those cool light box things they have on the exterior of the Nordstrom downtown. Something like that could look really cool on the exterior of buildings like this, especially when there is so much blank wall (likely due to floor plan reasons).



Especially since I think it can look pretty nice even in the daytime. I really wish more buildings downtown would use this element, making it a 'Salt Lake' thing.


Last edited by Blah_Amazing; Mar 10, 2021 at 4:51 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9605  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 5:11 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlas View Post
Such a shame about the fate of the Kelly Houses.

On a positive note, here's a new picture of Dixon Place from u/wow-how-original on the subreddit:

https://www.liveatdixon.com/?fbclid=IwAR2NoLs2Zie6VpF96vk8AoFpa_QpU19BSuYBM2EAfsYDxjtQPtPc65qsq0w

According to its leasing site, its slated to open Spring 2021 and it looks like it is going to meet that. The design and materials is really nice for what would otherwise be considered a 'small' project. I'm sure unit prices will reflect that tbh.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9606  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 8:41 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
The Highrise at Emeril. 27 N 800 W

https://citizenportal.slcgov.com/Citizen...50&agencyCode=SLCREF&IsToShowInspection=

A new project in the North Temple/ Euclid Neighborhood has filed Subdivision and Condominium Consolidation documents with the city.

The project will be located at 27 North and 800 West, stand 7 floors tall, and include 115 residential units.



I looked up the company listed on that document, Galloway, and they seem to have designed,engineered, and/or built quite a few large multifamily projects. However, I couldn't find anything related to the project on their site.

https://gallowayus.com/

Thanks to the application filing, though, I was able to look up the person listed as the contact and found this website for the investment group, Highrise Group. They appear to be the leading organization behind the project, and included the details quoted below:
https://www.highrise.group/

Quote:
27 N 800 W, SALT LAKE CITY UTAH
115 Units | Class A | New Development | 506(c) Syndication & Joint Venture OPEN | Purchased 15 Dec 2020

Directly west of the central business district of downtown Salt Lake with attractive TSA "right to build" zoning, these 3 parcels totaling 0.42 acre will be redeveloped from the existing 2 warehouses and 1 small empty lot into a market-rate mid rise modern apartment building. The property is purchased, city development review team is complete, demolition permits in progress, and final design has begun with Design West Architects. Major equity share from a joint venture partner to close the construction loan is currently open, as well as a limited partner tranche.
They also included images for the project, shown below:


Project Rendering


Surrounding Conditions


Site


Site Plan


Floor Plan


Existing Conditions


Existing Conditions


Existing Conditions

Last edited by Blah_Amazing; Mar 10, 2021 at 9:01 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9607  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 9:05 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Quote:
Originally Posted by millhouse View Post
It was my understanding they were going to put apartments for low income housing in that location. I believe the developers are also different.
Correct, that was the plan. That’s why this consolidation with The Village came as a complete surprise to me. Now I have no idea.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9608  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 11:08 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,483
Quote:
Originally Posted by Comrade View Post
It saddens me that you're more outraged over someone being outraged about the prospects of being homeless because it's becoming increasingly difficult to find affordable housing in Salt Lake than actually being outraged over the continued leveling of affordable options that are being replaced with condos and rental units that price out over half the city from the start.
Building adds supply. Not building creates San Francisco.

Ideally, if 7 units are bulldozed at $1/sq.ft., the developer should be required to provide ~7 units at the same price within the new development — with the displaced resident given first option to rent.

Combine that with phased construction (so you can juggle the tenants around), and it could be a win-win.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9609  
Old Posted Mar 10, 2021, 7:48 PM
DJ Mentat's Avatar
DJ Mentat DJ Mentat is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2021
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 12
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing View Post
https://ksltv.com/456978/dozens-rally-against-kozo-house-apartments-in-slc/



Is anti-development sentiments getting out of hand in Salt Lake?
Yes and no.

As many others have said and are aware, there is a severe housing shortage and a severe affordable housing crisis in SLC and across the country right now. There are many possible solutions to this, with the most obvious being to build more housing. The law of supply and demand should dictate that with more housing stock, prices will eventually fall. In that sense, opposing projects like the Kozo House is counterproductive, as that development will result in a net gain of ~305 units (assuming that one house = one unit).

However, the opposition is not without merit. I was recently made aware of the fact that the City Council has absolutely no means through which to enforce affordable housing claims made by a developer. This seems incredibly short-sighted, especially since the promise of affordable housing can get you so far: i.e. earning points for a design in a TSA zone, promising affordable housing as a means to pass a Planned Development (affordable housing is listed as one of the main objective in that portion of the city's zoning code), etc. etc.

So one possible solution beyond simply building more housing would be to ensure that the city has the means to actually enforce the claims that a developer makes during the review process.

Another possible solution could come with re-writing portions of the zoning code. I recently watched the following video (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCOdQsZa15o) about the missing middle. Turns out, the SLC zoning code, as with many other cities, does not allow anything other than single-family housing in most single-family residential zones (basically everything that is some shade of yellow on this map). Re-write the code to allow duplexes and triplexes to be built by-right in at least some of those zones, and you could allow for additional increases in housing stock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9610  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 1:09 AM
Utah_Dave Utah_Dave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 699
Just to add my 2 cents onto what DJ just posted about cities adjusting their Zoning a little bit. There are large areas of Eastern Salt lake county, all along the East bench of empty nesters that are occupying large single family homes because they really don’t have good alternative housing in their immediate neighborhood that suits what they want. therefore you get retirement age people living in large single family homes for much longer then they need. It would be smart to add some small developments that cater to that crowd in a much more dense footprint which would require some changes in the city and maybe even cities working with developers on a smaller scale to make it happen. Perhaps some small 55+ Developments. The old Cottonwood mall site comes to mind. These current home owners really like there neighborhoods but there are very few options that would interest them. What’s being put up now around the valley won’t attract the empty nesters and I think that’s were the cities can maybe help guide developers to make a variety or housing opportunities and free up some existing single family homes and give the retirement age group a real viable option for housing. There won’t be one easy solution to the housing problem but I think some small changes here and there could make significant differences. I don’t think many people would protest some dense housing for a 55+ crowd. They aren’t a rowdy bunch and they tend to care for their houses and would keep property values up.... just a thought
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9611  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 7:40 AM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Fox 13: Residents worry about future after getting kicked out for apartment complex

Video Link


https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news...getting-kicked-out-for-apartment-complex

Full Fox 13 Article:


Last edited by Blah_Amazing; Mar 12, 2021 at 7:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9612  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 1:27 PM
Blah_Amazing Blah_Amazing is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2017
Posts: 850
Fox 13:Religion says rezoning request in SLC could harm spiritual practices

Video Link


Full Fox 13 Article: https://www.fox13now.com/news/local-news...st-in-slc-could-harm-spiritual-practices

By: Todd Tanner Posted at 9:51 PM, Mar 10, 2021


Last edited by Blah_Amazing; Mar 12, 2021 at 7:44 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9613  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 4:35 PM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,995
I found an apartment project that was new to me: "The Citizen Apartments." The developer website only says this:
Quote:
The Citizen is a 264 unit apartment community located in downtown Salt Lake City, UT. As such, the amenities support an urban lifestyle featuring a large central courtyard, pool, hot tub, roof top deck, yoga studio, fitness center, pet wash, bike storage, high tech co-working space, fire pits, smart home technology, and more.
And another website says this:
Quote:
264 unit apartment project within walking distance of Trader Joe’s, Whole Foods, and many other Salt Lake City retail and services.
But there's no specific location listed. Based on the second quote, it sounds like it's somewhere around 400 S and 700 E.



Also, here's a cool rendering from late 2017 of the Hardware Station office building that is presumably in limbo.

__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9614  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 6:39 PM
allh allh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2020
Location: San Francisco, CA
Posts: 94
https://imgur.com/a/uvkGp6z

The architect for the "Asher Adams" Hotel has released another render. Looks like they might start up the project soon.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9615  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 8:27 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
Quote:
Originally Posted by allh View Post
https://imgur.com/a/uvkGp6z

The architect for the "Asher Adams" Hotel has released another render. Looks like they might start up the project soon.
Too bad. I was hoping this one was dead.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9616  
Old Posted Mar 11, 2021, 8:31 PM
bob rulz bob rulz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Location: SL,UT
Posts: 1,616
https://www.buildingsaltlake.com/new-adu...ke-city-show-improvement-coming-in-2021/

Time to make ADUs allowed by-right throughout the city. Every single ADU request ever put up has been approved as far as I can tell, and the lengthy process required is likely suppressing demand for them to be built. ADUs will never be a housing solution at these numbers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9617  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 1:48 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,483
I'd say make ADUs a right. No inspection. No permit. No approval.

Make it an enforcement issue when somebody complains (e.g., fire safety issues).
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9618  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 8:21 PM
freeshavocado freeshavocado is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2019
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 123
Not sure if this was already mentioned, but the CCH (Hyatt Regency) was added to the Salt Lake City diagram: https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=90
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9619  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 8:31 PM
nushiof nushiof is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 257
Quote:
Originally Posted by freeshavocado View Post
Not sure if this was already mentioned, but the CCH (Hyatt Regency) was added to the Salt Lake City diagram: https://skyscraperpage.com/diagrams/?cityID=90
Nice. Liberty Sky should be added too.

They also have "slots" for where the Kensington Tower and Main St. Apartment Tower will go if you check the "proposed" and "all buildings" boxes. Pretty cool we'll have 11 buildings over 100 meters soon. Now it's time to break that 150 meter ceiling!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9620  
Old Posted Mar 12, 2021, 8:35 PM
Atlas's Avatar
Atlas Atlas is offline
Space Magi
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Salt Lake City
Posts: 1,995
Someone has been working diligently to get those added to the database Still waiting for my Worthington Tower request to go through.

Getting drawings made is more difficult. I've put out requests for those but it's up to the artists to decide to take the time and make them.
__________________
r/DevelopmentSLC
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:37 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.