Quote:
Originally Posted by Blah_Amazing
|
Yes and no.
As many others have said and are aware, there is a severe housing shortage and a severe affordable housing crisis in SLC and across the country right now. There are many possible solutions to this, with the most obvious being to build more housing. The law of supply and demand
should dictate that with more housing stock, prices will eventually fall. In that sense, opposing projects like the Kozo House is counterproductive, as that development will result in a net gain of ~305 units (assuming that one house = one unit).
However, the opposition is not without merit. I was recently made aware of the fact that the City Council has absolutely no means through which to enforce affordable housing claims made by a developer. This seems incredibly short-sighted, especially since the promise of affordable housing can get you so far: i.e. earning points for a design in a TSA zone, promising affordable housing as a means to pass a Planned Development (affordable housing is listed as one of the main objective in that portion of the city's zoning code), etc. etc.
So one possible solution beyond simply building more housing would be to ensure that the city has the means to actually enforce the claims that a developer makes during the review process.
Another possible solution could come with re-writing portions of the zoning code. I recently watched the following video (
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CCOdQsZa15o) about the missing middle. Turns out, the SLC zoning code, as with many other cities, does not allow anything other than single-family housing in most single-family residential zones (basically everything that is some shade of yellow on
this map). Re-write the code to allow duplexes and triplexes to be built by-right in at least some of those zones, and you could allow for additional increases in housing stock.