HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6361  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 8:36 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The traditional perception is not really in line with the current reality. It feels like you'd have to go back to the early 90s to find a time when the Canadiens still felt like a predominantly Francophone team, at least as far as the players are concerned.

Bringing it back to Tremblay, his column implies that the "old way" is the ideal state of affairs when the reality is that the Habs' new normal is a team made up almost exclusively of non-Quebecers.
One of the beefs people like Tremblay have is that back in the day players like Larry Robinson, Bob Gainey and Ken Dryden, all from Ontario, learned to speak French when playing for the Habs.

I guess things have changed and players move around more between teams these days (mercenaries as begratto said) as opposed to being lifers with one team.

There are always a few anglos on the team who already speak French when they arrive (like Paul Byron, who is from Ottawa) but I honestly can't remember the last player who learned to speak French simply by virtue of playing with the Habs.
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #6362  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 8:52 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,691
I stopped watching NHL hockey about a decade ago. There just weren't enough players on the teams that I could identify with. So many trades, next to no 'local boys' (e.g., flying frenchmen), awful sounds blasting your eardrums, that idiot anti-french Cherry 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 with the ugly suits...and Canadian teams just never seem to win the Stanley Cup anyways so why bother? Gary Bettman and his minions have ruined "our"game.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #6363  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 9:42 PM
LakeLocker LakeLocker is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: London ON
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
From time to time SSP and other forums discuss Quebec having its own hockey team at international competitions.

There is actually a foundation that is working on this (not just for hockey, but for other sports too).

I think some of you guys might want to learn more about this, and the movement's figurehead:

https://www.reddit.com/r/Quebec/comments...%A0_la_fondation_%C3%A9quipequ%C3%A9bec/
What urked the flying 🞵🞵🞵🞵 out of me was the NHL's world cup of Hockey.

It was NHLPA teams only, so they had to start making up teams to fill in the limited roster depth.

They had a Team Europe(which didn't include sweden,czechia,russia,finalnd) and a team north America(which was two juniors teams mashed together)

Since the whole thing was more or less a summer money grab for Canadian markets, it would of made perfect sense to have a team Quebec.

People gutted me on this and its beyond stupid. A world cup of hockey scenario would of been perfect for an all Quebecois team.

Something the NHL could make money from this by simply hosting it in quebec, it is something external audiences would enjoy more than team North America. It also would of weakened team Canada making the tournament more fair.
     
     
  #6364  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 9:47 PM
LakeLocker LakeLocker is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: London ON
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
One important question seems to be whether or not race would be a "deal breaker" in this. For example if you had somebody of Chinese ancestry, born in China, who grew up in Quebec, knew about the local culture, spoke French, and was really good at hockey, would people in Quebec have a problem with this person being on the team?

My impression is no. Sports seem pretty meritocratic in the sense that fans tend to like whoever is winning (although the "pipeline" of who gets the opportunity to develop their skill may not be equally open to everyone).
There's real research that shows people are more likely to forget ethnic-racial differences if the person is playing for their team.

I don't think anyone is passing up on Hispanics from arizona(Matthews), a first nations goal tender(Price), a german player(Draisaital), or a guy that is half japanese(Suzuki).

I think people only get on with "they aren't really french" is if they are on the opposing team. In which case the most absurd of claims gets mentioned.
     
     
  #6365  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 9:54 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by LakeLocker View Post
What urked the flying 🞵🞵🞵🞵 out of me was the NHL's world cup of Hockey.

It was NHLPA teams only, so they had to start making up teams to fill in the limited roster depth.

They had a Team Europe(which didn't include sweden,czechia,russia,finalnd) and a team north America(which was two juniors teams mashed together)

Since the whole thing was more or less a summer money grab for Canadian markets, it would of made perfect sense to have a team Quebec.

People gutted me on this and its beyond stupid. A world cup of hockey scenario would of been perfect for an all Quebecois team.

Something the NHL could make money from this by simply hosting it in quebec, it is something external audiences would enjoy more than team North America. It also would of weakened team Canada making the tournament more fair.
That stupid World Cup of Hockey was my least favourite hockey event ever. It just sucked sucked sucked.

As for a Quebec team, I don't think Hockey Canada or even Canada in general, would ever go for that in a million years.

I actually think it would be a good thing for the IIHF and international hockey in general. There aren't enough teams as it is that can play at the top level which makes things lacking in diversity (always the same teams), and while Quebec wouldn't be as strong as Canada-sans-Quebec, it could still hold its own in the top tournaments I am sure.
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #6366  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2021, 10:25 PM
LakeLocker LakeLocker is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: London ON
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
That stupid World Cup of Hockey was my least favourite hockey event ever. It just sucked sucked sucked.

As for a Quebec team, I don't think Hockey Canada or even Canada in general, would ever go for that in a million years.

I actually think it would be a good thing for the IIHF and international hockey in general. There aren't enough teams as it is that can play at the top level which makes things lacking in diversity (always the same teams), and while Quebec wouldn't be as strong as Canada-sans-Quebec, it could still hold its own in the top tournaments I am sure.
I actually think outside of that sort of thing Quebec getting its own sports teams would be super dumb.

It makes sense in the crash grab cup, since it's just a selection of NHL players. And the uniqueness of that setting would make for a more logical set up.

But outside of hockey that'd be the beginning of the end if they had their owns teams.

To me its the epitome of pointless quebecois nationalism. Where the French language is used as a vehicle for hicks, they don't care about the language etc, these same people would be just as nationalistic if Toronto was 100% francophone.

I'm a fan of Canadians should learn/speak french type nationalism. But that separatist 🞵🞵🞵🞵 I loath. Sports is the type of thing that can breath a sense of a nation. Hockey is an exception since we dominate.

But a Quebec soccer team etc just seems incredibly pointless, and more along the lines lets burn every bridge that exists between the "two" nations.
     
     
  #6367  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 1:13 AM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
One of the beefs people like Tremblay have is that back in the day players like Larry Robinson, Bob Gainey and Ken Dryden, all from Ontario, learned to speak French when playing for the Habs.

I guess things have changed and players move around more between teams these days (mercenaries as begratto said) as opposed to being lifers with one team.

There are always a few anglos on the team who already speak French when they arrive (like Paul Byron, who is from Ottawa) but I honestly can't remember the last player who learned to speak French simply by virtue of playing with the Habs.
Not sure if Saku Koivu did or not, but he seems like one who would have.

Edit: No, just looked it up and most certainly no.
     
     
  #6368  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 1:46 AM
wave46 wave46 is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Posts: 3,875
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
I stopped watching NHL hockey about a decade ago. There just weren't enough players on the teams that I could identify with. So many trades, next to no 'local boys' (e.g., flying frenchmen), awful sounds blasting your eardrums, that idiot anti-french Cherry 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 with the ugly suits...and Canadian teams just never seem to win the Stanley Cup anyways so why bother? Gary Bettman and his minions have ruined "our"game.
The modern-day NHL is like the local restaurant hitting it big and franchising itself.

It becomes more polished, more fancy, yet more generic. Cleaner, with 'nicer' and better looking but far more vapid waitresses. It tries new things to appeal to the trendy crowd. Some of them are modest hits, some are downright atrocities.

It's Tim Hortons making donuts in Brantford, not in the back kitchen. Expanding to weird places where it doesn't make sense. The food looks like food, but the taste isn't there.

The NHL is like this. It's hockey, yes. Tim's donuts are donuts, technically speaking. It's not ever going to be the small restaurant you loved again.

Gary Bettman's the best commissioner the NHL has ever had, if all you care about is profitability. He's the worst if you wanted to see the NHL of old.

Last edited by wave46; Feb 10, 2021 at 6:41 PM.
     
     
  #6369  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 4:26 AM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I guess things have changed and players move around more between teams these days (mercenaries as begratto said) as opposed to being lifers with one team.
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
I stopped watching NHL hockey about a decade ago. There just weren't enough players on the teams that I could identify with. So many trades, next to no 'local boys'
Quote:
Originally Posted by begratto View Post
Many people in Quebec would indeed prefer this. I know I would. It would be way more interesting in my opinion.

What's the pleasure in watching mercenaries who don't speak the local language, don't really care about the history of the team and where they are playing? How can you get the same attachment to players who are exchanged after a few years instead of being part of the team's tradition in the long run.
Well said. I feel the same. "Mercenaries" is a very accurate term. It would be way more interesting if the various teams were made of people from the places in question (and their "catchment areas"), and didn't change all the time through trades.

(This concept couldn't work anymore in a league that has a bunch of Sunbelt teams nowadays; they wouldn't be able to find players.)
     
     
  #6370  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 5:15 AM
Hali87 Hali87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Which part of Canada is the most racist is not really a game I enjoy playing. But if others want to play it, I can sure play along too.
I don't think it's really a competition and I think we could all do better.
     
     
  #6371  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 6:02 AM
Hali87 Hali87 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Location: Calgary
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Réjean Tremblay was partly being silly, partly being a 🞵🞵🞵🞵 and partly being an old curmudgeon.

There's not really much there TBQH.
I guess. I don't want to read too much into this particular situation not knowing many of the details but it's unfortunate that a lot of people (certainly in the ROC, maybe not Quebec?) still tend to view Asian descent = "From China" = "not Canadian" - there are plenty of 2nd/3rd/4th-generation Japanese-Canadians (for example) who will, absurdly, always be thought of by many as "being from China". Of course most of those people are curmudgeons and/or dicks and it 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 when public figures reinforce this. Sometimes it's innocuous but very often it's not. I don't really have the energy to argue over how much this matters in the grand scheme of things but it did strike a nerve for me.

A recent (not from Quebec) example of something like that playing out (certainly this guy is both a curmudgeon and a 🞵🞵🞵🞵!)
     
     
  #6372  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 2:32 PM
MolsonExport's Avatar
MolsonExport MolsonExport is offline
Touching grass everyday.
 
Join Date: Oct 2003
Location: Otisburgh
Posts: 51,691
The great old days:

sportsnet

back then Jeff Robinson (son of Larry) was one of my best friends.
__________________
The whole problem with the world is that fools and fanatics are always so certain of themselves, and wiser people so full of doubts. (Bertrand Russell). Sweet Loretta fart thought she was a cleaner, but she was a frying pan. (John Lennon)
     
     
  #6373  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 6:36 PM
JHikka's Avatar
JHikka JHikka is offline
ハルウララ
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 12,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
Réjean Tremblay was partly being silly, partly being a 🞵🞵🞵🞵 and partly being an old curmudgeon.

There's not really much there TBQH.
He was being racist. Full stop.

Nathan Ni covered and articulated this better than I could, so i'll just copy paste here the relevant sections:

The CH is not yours to define
By Nathan Ni Feb 10, 2021, 10:00am EST

"First, it is deeply offensive to the Montreal Canadiens.

...

Yet, in their heart of hearts, Monsieur Tremblay and his ilk must acknowledge an uncomfortable truth, one that lies in the very name of the franchise that they claim to adore. The Canadiens have never existed solely to represent Francophone Québec, and they have never ever represented souverainistes. That would be the team that used to be down the highway. The one in blue and white covered with fleurs-de-lys.

But because the Nordiques no longer exist, Monsieur Tremblay must bend the Canadiens to his whims. To do this, he conjures the image of a Canadiens that perhaps never existed in reality.

That brings us to the second offence: Monsieur Tremblay’s utter contempt for his audience.

While the reference to the captain may seem natural, the second position called out seems awkward. Why the goaltender of all positions? Why not the top centre or the best winger?

The answer is rather simple: a clumsy allusion to the mid-90s. Monsieur Tremblay makes it even more blatant by his inclusion of Guy Carbonneau by name when listing French Canadian greats over the team’s history. Indeed, it was a halcyon time when the composition of the Montreal Canadiens was more amenable to a nationalist agenda. Once upon a time, the Canadiens were “French.”

Nevermind the fact that the team of the 90s was built upon the foundational work of Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Chris Chelios, and Mats Näslund.

Never mind that the heroes of the ‘93 run included Kirk Muller, Brian Bellows, Paul DiPietro, and John LeClair.

Never mind that after Carbonneau’s departure, the next captain was Kirk Muller.

...

Certainly, there is a temptation to focus on Monsieur Tremblay’s racism to the exclusion of the rest of the article. It was right there, front and centre, and it is so laughably offensive that one can’t help but notice it. To a Chinese person, “Fang Wong” is the equivalent of “Vodka Drunkenski”. The two phonemes cannot even coexist in one name, as “Fang” is taken from Hanyu Pinyin, used exclusively for Mandarin, while “Wong” is taken from Jyutping, used exclusively for Yue (Cantonese).

But Monsieur Tremblay’s racism against the Chinese is merely the canary in the coal mine for his article. See, for him, it is not possible for “Fang Wong” to be part of the Montreal Canadiens. Monsieur Tremblay’s Canadiens, that supposed exclusionary bastion of Francophone culture, cannot co-exist with a team that employs, as he put it, “20 Fang Wongs.”


Unfortunately for Monsieur Tremblay, his Montreal Canadiens are not the Montreal Canadiens.

The Montreal Canadiens include the Richards, the Béliveaus, the Plantes that forged the team into what it is today, but also contains the Reardons, Durnans, and Lachs. It is a team shaped by Roys and Carbonneaus, Näslunds and Koivus, Subbans and Sourays, Plekanecs and Markovs.

It is a team that currently belongs to two kids from British Columbia.

It is a team whose future is held by a “Kotkaniemi,” a “鈴木,” and a “Рома́нов.”

Perhaps one day, the torch will be passed to a “方”, or a “黃”, to a “卢”, “韩”, or “倪”.

They will line up next to Danaults and Drouins, Côtés and Fortins, Roys and Gagnons.

They will all hear the opening strains of O Canada as “terre des nos aïeux,” they will be greeted by the fans screaming both “les Canadiens sont là” and “go Habs go,” they will endure the dulcet tones of Nickelback and Mitsou over the PA in equal measure.

They will be Canadiens — with an e, not an a.

And they will all be sons (or daughters) of Montreal."


https://www.habseyesontheprize.com/2021/...rus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter

Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
I actually think it would be a good thing for the IIHF and international hockey in general. There aren't enough teams as it is that can play at the top level which makes things lacking in diversity (always the same teams), and while Quebec wouldn't be as strong as Canada-sans-Quebec, it could still hold its own in the top tournaments I am sure.
A Quebec team at the Worlds simply wouldn't be any more competitive than the likes of Slovakia or Belarus, and their quality is declining rapidly. Their NHL cohort is declining and aging out rapidly and is not being replaced by high-end talent. Once Fleury retires Quebec's NHL goalies are Jonathan Bernier and Louis Domingue, as one example. Bergeron, Letang, and Vlasic will all soon retire and their cohort is not sustainably being replaced at the NHL level. This idea of a Quebec National Team being strong and competitive at an international level made sense in 2003, but in 2021 they simply don't stack up any more.

Last edited by JHikka; Feb 10, 2021 at 6:47 PM.
     
     
  #6374  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 6:43 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
He was being racist. Full stop.

Nathan Ni covered and articulated this better than I could, so i'll just copy paste here the relevant sections:

The CH is not yours to define
By Nathan Ni Feb 10, 2021, 10:00am EST

"First, it is deeply offensive to the Montreal Canadiens.

...

Yet, in their heart of hearts, Monsieur Tremblay and his ilk must acknowledge an uncomfortable truth, one that lies in the very name of the franchise that they claim to adore. The Canadiens have never existed solely to represent Francophone Québec, and they have never ever represented souverainistes. That would be the team that used to be down the highway. The one in blue and white covered with fleurs-de-lys.

But because the Nordiques no longer exist, Monsieur Tremblay must bend the Canadiens to his whims. To do this, he conjures the image of a Canadiens that perhaps never existed in reality.

That brings us to the second offence: Monsieur Tremblay’s utter contempt for his audience.

While the reference to the captain may seem natural, the second position called out seems awkward. Why the goaltender of all positions? Why not the top centre or the best winger?

The answer is rather simple: a clumsy allusion to the mid-90s. Monsieur Tremblay makes it even more blatant by his inclusion of Guy Carbonneau by name when listing French Canadian greats over the team’s history. Indeed, it was a halcyon time when the composition of the Montreal Canadiens was more amenable to a nationalist agenda. Once upon a time, the Canadiens were “French.”

Nevermind the fact that the team of the 90s was built upon the foundational work of Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Chris Chelios, and Mats Näslund.

Never mind that the heroes of the ‘93 run included Kirk Muller, Brian Bellows, Paul DiPietro, and John LeClair.

Never mind that after Carbonneau’s departure, the next captain was Kirk Muller.

...

Certainly, there is a temptation to focus on Monsieur Tremblay’s racism to the exclusion of the rest of the article. It was right there, front and centre, and it is so laughably offensive that one can’t help but notice it. To a Chinese person, “Fang Wong” is the equivalent of “Vodka Drunkenski”. The two phonemes cannot even coexist in one name, as “Fang” is taken from Hanyu Pinyin, used exclusively for Mandarin, while “Wong” is taken from Jyutping, used exclusively for Yue (Cantonese).

But Monsieur Tremblay’s racism against the Chinese is merely the canary in the coal mine for his article. See, for him, it is not possible for “Fang Wong” to be part of the Montreal Canadiens. Monsieur Tremblay’s Canadiens, that supposed exclusionary bastion of Francophone culture, cannot co-exist with a team that employs, as he put it, “20 Fang Wongs.”


Unfortunately for Monsieur Tremblay, his Montreal Canadiens are not the Montreal Canadiens.

The Montreal Canadiens include the Richards, the Béliveaus, the Plantes that forged the team into what it is today, but also contains the Reardons, Durnans, and Lachs. It is a team shaped by Roys and Carbonneaus, Näslunds and Koivus, Subbans and Sourays, Plekanecs and Markovs.

It is a team that currently belongs to two kids from British Columbia.

It is a team whose future is held by a “Kotkaniemi,” a “鈴木,” and a “Рома́нов.”

Perhaps one day, the torch will be passed to a “方”, or a “黃”, to a “卢”, “韩”, or “倪”.

They will line up next to Danaults and Drouins, Côtés and Fortins, Roys and Gagnons.

They will all hear the opening strains of O Canada as “terre des nos aïeux,” they will be greeted by the fans screaming both “les Canadiens sont là” and “go Habs go,” they will endure the dulcet tones of Nickelback and Mitsou over the PA in equal measure.

They will be Canadiens — with an e, not an a.

And they will all be sons (or daughters) of Montreal."


https://www.habseyesontheprize.com/2021/...rus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter
That's actually a fantastic opinion piece. Almost moving I'd say. Actually, it probably will be for a lot of people. Thanks for posting.
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #6375  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 6:46 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Interestingly enough the author doesn't live in Montreal (and may have never lived there) and apparently doesn't really speak French.

But he hit on a bunch of the right buttons, with aplomb.

https://ca.linkedin.com/public-profile/i...nId=45b92c86-2677-6216-4631-0f3ce3d18c01
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #6376  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 7:32 PM
rousseau's Avatar
rousseau rousseau is offline
Registered Drug User
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Southern Ontario
Posts: 8,216
Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport View Post
The great old days:
I'm feeling triggered by the lack of diversity in that picture.
     
     
  #6377  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2021, 7:45 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by rousseau View Post
I'm feeling triggered by the lack of diversity in that picture.
Larry (Big Bird) Robinson's a ginger.
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
     
     
  #6378  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2021, 9:42 PM
Ducharme78 Ducharme78 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2020
Location: Brisbane Qld
Posts: 29
https://www.cbc.ca/radio/thehouse/racialized-canadians-vaccine-priority-1.5911952

Just the opinion of two apparent experts, but can you imagine the shitnado that would appear if "Black Canadians and other people of colour" were given vaccine priority? I see this as the conceptual pinnacle of the current hyperfocus on race - literally a life and death matter being projected through the lens of race. Legitimately or otherwise.
     
     
  #6379  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2021, 10:16 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,993
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ducharme78 View Post
Just the opinion of two apparent experts, but can you imagine the shitnado that would appear if "Black Canadians and other people of colour" were given vaccine priority? I see this as the conceptual pinnacle of the current hyperfocus on race - literally a life and death matter being projected through the lens of race. Legitimately or otherwise.
The problem is not race is being used per se, it's bad analysis.

As an example, if you have higher prevalence of a comorbidity in racial group and the comorbidity hugely increases risk of death, the correct answer for vaccine rollout may be to pick out the people with the comorbidity, not whichever racial group has higher prevalence of the comorbidity, which consists mostly of people without the comorbidity.

The gradient in risk by race is smaller than a bunch of other known risk factors. The US CDC provides a breakdown for the US: https://www.cdc.gov/coronavirus/2019-nco...italization-death-by-race-ethnicity.html

Black people are 1.9x more likely to have died of covid than non-Hispanic whites. This gradient is smaller than the risk of death gradient between 40-somethings and 50-somethings. The gradient between a 40-something and 80+ in Canada is well over 100x: https://health-infobase.canada.ca/covid-19/epidemiological-summary-covid-19-cases.html#a7

The community outreach aspect seems separate from the question of vaccine allocation and putting efforts into outreach is not really bound by the vaccine supply.

Last edited by someone123; Feb 13, 2021 at 10:45 PM.
     
     
  #6380  
Old Posted Feb 13, 2021, 10:35 PM
LakeLocker LakeLocker is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2019
Location: London ON
Posts: 1,848
Quote:
Originally Posted by JHikka View Post
He was being racist. Full stop.

Nathan Ni covered and articulated this better than I could, so i'll just copy paste here the relevant sections:

The CH is not yours to define
By Nathan Ni Feb 10, 2021, 10:00am EST

"First, it is deeply offensive to the Montreal Canadiens.

...

Yet, in their heart of hearts, Monsieur Tremblay and his ilk must acknowledge an uncomfortable truth, one that lies in the very name of the franchise that they claim to adore. The Canadiens have never existed solely to represent Francophone Québec, and they have never ever represented souverainistes. That would be the team that used to be down the highway. The one in blue and white covered with fleurs-de-lys.

But because the Nordiques no longer exist, Monsieur Tremblay must bend the Canadiens to his whims. To do this, he conjures the image of a Canadiens that perhaps never existed in reality.

That brings us to the second offence: Monsieur Tremblay’s utter contempt for his audience.

While the reference to the captain may seem natural, the second position called out seems awkward. Why the goaltender of all positions? Why not the top centre or the best winger?

The answer is rather simple: a clumsy allusion to the mid-90s. Monsieur Tremblay makes it even more blatant by his inclusion of Guy Carbonneau by name when listing French Canadian greats over the team’s history. Indeed, it was a halcyon time when the composition of the Montreal Canadiens was more amenable to a nationalist agenda. Once upon a time, the Canadiens were “French.”

Nevermind the fact that the team of the 90s was built upon the foundational work of Bob Gainey, Larry Robinson, Chris Chelios, and Mats Näslund.

Never mind that the heroes of the ‘93 run included Kirk Muller, Brian Bellows, Paul DiPietro, and John LeClair.

Never mind that after Carbonneau’s departure, the next captain was Kirk Muller.

...

Certainly, there is a temptation to focus on Monsieur Tremblay’s racism to the exclusion of the rest of the article. It was right there, front and centre, and it is so laughably offensive that one can’t help but notice it. To a Chinese person, “Fang Wong” is the equivalent of “Vodka Drunkenski”. The two phonemes cannot even coexist in one name, as “Fang” is taken from Hanyu Pinyin, used exclusively for Mandarin, while “Wong” is taken from Jyutping, used exclusively for Yue (Cantonese).

But Monsieur Tremblay’s racism against the Chinese is merely the canary in the coal mine for his article. See, for him, it is not possible for “Fang Wong” to be part of the Montreal Canadiens. Monsieur Tremblay’s Canadiens, that supposed exclusionary bastion of Francophone culture, cannot co-exist with a team that employs, as he put it, “20 Fang Wongs.”


Unfortunately for Monsieur Tremblay, his Montreal Canadiens are not the Montreal Canadiens.

The Montreal Canadiens include the Richards, the Béliveaus, the Plantes that forged the team into what it is today, but also contains the Reardons, Durnans, and Lachs. It is a team shaped by Roys and Carbonneaus, Näslunds and Koivus, Subbans and Sourays, Plekanecs and Markovs.

It is a team that currently belongs to two kids from British Columbia.

It is a team whose future is held by a “Kotkaniemi,” a “鈴木,” and a “Рома́нов.”

Perhaps one day, the torch will be passed to a “方”, or a “黃”, to a “卢”, “韩”, or “倪”.

They will line up next to Danaults and Drouins, Côtés and Fortins, Roys and Gagnons.

They will all hear the opening strains of O Canada as “terre des nos aïeux,” they will be greeted by the fans screaming both “les Canadiens sont là” and “go Habs go,” they will endure the dulcet tones of Nickelback and Mitsou over the PA in equal measure.

They will be Canadiens — with an e, not an a.

And they will all be sons (or daughters) of Montreal."


https://www.habseyesontheprize.com/2021/...rus&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter


A Quebec team at the Worlds simply wouldn't be any more competitive than the likes of Slovakia or Belarus, and their quality is declining rapidly. Their NHL cohort is declining and aging out rapidly and is not being replaced by high-end talent. Once Fleury retires Quebec's NHL goalies are Jonathan Bernier and Louis Domingue, as one example. Bergeron, Letang, and Vlasic will all soon retire and their cohort is not sustainably being replaced at the NHL level. This idea of a Quebec National Team being strong and competitive at an international level made sense in 2003, but in 2021 they simply don't stack up any more.
I'll never understand the narrative that the Canadiens are a french Canadian thing.

Ignoring the anglo montrealers, there's a ton of fans in Canada and the US that speak rench.

On hfboards the habs english speaking sub is one of the largest most vocal and annoying fanbases(up there with the leafs).

In Newfoundland there's always been a 3 way split with bruins/habs/leafs.

Being a habs fan didn't make you a frenchy.

The narrative that more liberal people gravitate towards the habs is a new thing. And I'd guess a lot more of that has to do with Toronto based media being so obnoxious versus a desire to identity with non white players like Price, Suzuki, Suban.


I'm a strong believer that actual racism is a petty behavior and it is a 1 percent component of a much bigger issue.

50 percent is the simple fact that groups will work together to compete against the other.

30-40 percent is when people start getting on with group identities as being an important part of governance/life.

It's why I avoid the idea of giving any validity to any group identity be it gay, autistic, native, immigrant, catholic, french etc.

A big part of my soul wishes Canada could go full on with french nationalist, force the NHL to giving us our own division, with all players being drafted from Canadians towns and cities.

Make French our official language, tax american media and sponsor the living hell out of our content.

But sweet dam do I see that kind of thing hitting the rails.

A great example of this is found with russia and quebec.

They've both gone out of their way to define themselves by ommitting the most obvious aspects of their culture (french Canadian) (european slavs).

Both groups actively created notions that they are different from a broader more encompassing identity. One group defines itself as Eurasian to move away from the obvious reality, which is russia is agan falling radically behind the rest of eastern Europe. While the french's idea of trying to keep Quebec a container for all french and only french a total disaster.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:41 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.