Quote:
Originally Posted by HomeInMyShoes
A biscuit is a cute, sweet, or pretty girl (think cookie.)
Calling a guy (probably a guy because this is skyscraperpage) a biscuit is pretty much equivalent to calling them a dumb blonde. I expect better out of forumers, but the quality of posting has gone way down hill the last while.
|
Nah it's just a nicer way of calling him a dumb b*tch (obviously in a gender neutral sense, same way as I, many others, and Australians use the word c*nt) after the years of nonsense he's tried to screw me around with. Beyond justified, especially when he posts shit he has no clue about (the post I was responding to).
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13
I don't have a source. It was based on a quick Google Streetview tour of a few neighborhoods around downtown Calgary. The architectural style is different from what I know in Quebec and Ontario so I can't be sure, but a few areas seemed to be early post-WWII in Calgary.
The City of Ottawa has a website called geoOttawa. On the website, you can see zoning, parks, public facilities, current and future transit lines... But the coolest part are the satellite images that go all the way back to 1928, so we can see the development of Ottawa and Gatineau over close to 100 years.
Does any other city have this type of website?
|
Lol that would be because the building materials used early on out here (wood) are much different than the materials used out there (stone). Just because a house is a wooden bungalow doesn't mean it's post-war. If it is anywhere in the inner city of Calgary, Edmonton, Saskatoon, Winnipeg, Regina, and even Vancouver, it means it was built a century or more ago when all of these cities were considered part of the frontier, especially the Prairie cities sans Winnipeg. The explosive population growth early on meant that houses need to be thrown up fast. This is why in a lot of early photos of Calgary (1880s/90s), half the city lived in tents because they couldn't build the houses fast enough. Cheap, quick materials.