Quote:
Originally Posted by MolsonExport
The whole born-in-the-USA thing is ridiculous. Nobody seemed to care much that Ted Cruz was born in Canada (Calgary) and that John McCain was born in the Panama Canal Zone. Oh yeah, it is because they were White and Republican. But Obama and Harris? Born in the USA, sez who?
If someone moved to Canada at a young age, and was a Canadian citizen, I could care less where they were born, or where their parents were born.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer
The Harris “birthers” (for want of a better term) do not question that she was born in the USA. They base their (mistaken, racist, sexist, stupid, take your pick) view on the fact that her parents were apparently not yet U.S. permanent residents when she was born. Somehow, they imagine that she was not subject to U.S. jurisdiction as a result. It’s specious, but it’s good enough for those of the necessary mindset.
|
The thing is the media keeps giving air time to these "controversies" making them seem like they matter -- it also trickles down to lots of Americans in the general public who feel insecure (especially immigrant and minority) who see themselves represented in these public figures/candidates, and thus you see a lot more "I'm born in the USA!" defensiveness stateside, and overcompensating for "proving their Americanness" in ways you don't see for Canadians, politicians or your average Joe or Jane.
If they're already eligible for a position, they're eligible period. Give no more air time to naysayers. The original birtherism thing with Obama was similar -- why was this obsession drawn out for so long?
Like MolsonExport just said, we should care less about someone's birth or parent's birth as their station now. It's weird that the US, home of the "American dream" and "proposition nation", "we're exceptional in the way anyone can come here and be an American" narrative still harps on family background.
I find it weirdly "old-world-ish" the way the US (even slightly so) focuses a bit more on ancestry/family background in some walks of life. Having more political dynasties like Bushes, Clintons, Kennedy's etc. while before the Trudeaus and infamously for Ontarians, the Fords, the political dynasty thing seemed not particularly a thing for Canada. Even stuff like legacies in US colleges and universities and alma mater links (rare for Canadians to talk about caring if their mom or dad graduated from the same school). Even things like Americans caring more about descendants of the Civil War (Quebecois of the most separatist persuasion even de-emphasis pure laine now and don't talk about fighting on which side of the Plains of Abraham, and will say identity is about current language/cultural loyalty not ancestry or ancestral loyalty). Also stuff like the split between people who identify with ADOS (American descendants of slavery) who say people like Obama and Harris with more recent immigrant black roots are co-opting the "American black experience". Also something about native American ancestry being 1% or 0.1% like the Elizabeth Warren debate.
Maybe it's just that I've lacked exposure to living full-time in societies that care
even more about ancestry/family connections (e.g. Europe, Asia, Africa) but the US strikes me as a wee bit obsessed with "lineage" for lack of a better term. While Canada seems more "individual" and in situations like politics, business, education, academia, public figures seem to be under far less pressure to represent a "group", "bloc", "lineage", "family", "ethnicity", "race", etc. Family backgrounds of public figures aren't held up to a magnifying glass in some way that evokes "family pride" or "family shame" as if we're talking about Confucianist ancient China or something.
Maybe I'm off-base about my thoughts and Canuck identity politics are no less damning than Yanks', but say what you want about Trudeau's cliche " a Canadian is a Canadian" is a more individualist ethos than almost anywhere I can think of.
And yes, I realized a few posts ago, I said alongside Acajack's posts that "US and Canada are less different than people make them to be in terms of user-friendliness to newcomers" etc.
But some of the symbolism and rhetoric (e.g. no examples of "birtherism" ever in Canada because it's not even part of our requirement) does stick out just a bit.