Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13
Interesting opinion. Podium's are usually regarded as good urban design, preserving some semblance human-scale and reducing the wind tunnel effect.
|
Yes, they're a common feature for those reasons so they're probably not going away anytime soon. Personally I think the "preserving the human scale" part is part of what bothers me about them. I enjoy buildings that have strong, clean forms which is easier to do when a building has a single shape and orientation (such as vertical) rather than dividing it into sections. Doing so can feel like it's pretending to be something they're not. I would rather preserve the human scale by having more actual human-scale buildings of 10 or fewer stories spread over a larger area. My favourite setting for skyscrapers is to have them mixed in with smaller buildings because not only does it preserve the human scale, but it helps to accentuate and dramatize the height of the skyscraper so that the height - a skyscraper's most prominent feature - can be fully appreciated. A good example of this is how
Scotia interacts with its surroundings. I actually think Scotia does a good job in general because it manages to create a dramatic portal on both the north and south sides without creating a separate podium structure and instead using elaborate overhangs as an architectural feature.
In terms of wind mitigation I've always preferred overhangs and facade fins from an aesthetic standpoint. For instance, if you look closely at
the exterior of EY, you can see all the horizontal fins that reduce the downward velocity of wind. And
overhangs like on the St. Regis can perform a similar function. Such features are already commonly used for sun control.