HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #18601  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2020, 6:17 PM
Zepfancouver's Avatar
Zepfancouver Zepfancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2017
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,649
mcminsen...I would of kept on filming (public realm). At the Alberni site we where both capturing from a private property.
When documenting Alberni I was surrounded by Graham's site CSO and 2 carpenters asking if I had a good view (the hoarding quickly went up).
Then few days later the bldg manager of the adjacent property telling me I was on private property. So I made myself aware of property lines.
I now stand at the corner of the planter and the hoarding (public realm) I'm pushing the limit here

https://www.google.ca/maps/@49.2897137,-...HJd0J3xfiEBAm4GgGRl8Q!2e0!7i16384!8i8192

https://rezoning.vancouver.ca/applications/1550alberni/documents/10Landscape.pdf
     
     
  #18602  
Old Posted Jul 10, 2020, 10:03 PM
Jimbo604 Jimbo604 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 1,888
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
Some pics from today.

I would have gotten more pics but after that last one on Dunsmuir Street two security guards came barreling out the door and ordered me to stop taking pictures. They said it wasn't allowed.

I said I'm not on your property, I'm on the sidewalk and one of them (he looked like a security supervisor) said if I took any more pictures he would call the police and have me arrested. I just walked away.

Anyone else have an experience like this? On what basis would they be justified for calling the police to stop me? Again, I was on the sidewalk, near the curb.

Should have started filming the security guard. We should have a photo flash mob there!

Last edited by Jimbo604; Jul 10, 2020 at 10:23 PM.
     
     
  #18603  
Old Posted Jul 11, 2020, 10:45 PM
jollyburger jollyburger is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,594
Lady thinks that Hanson Trail is named after Rick Hanson. This map from 1975 has the Hanson Trail on it.

https://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/stanley-park-227

I proclaim Stanley Park a nature reserve and ban all people and cyclists and cars from it.

Quote:
Growing up on the North shore, we ventured across town occasionally.

Travelling in the back seat through Stanley Park toward Lions Gate Bridge was an encouraging sign we were on our way home. It seemed only natural that the Douglas firs and hemlocks that lined the causeway heralded our entrance to the North Shore, with snow-topped Ch'ich'iyúy Elxwíkn, the Twin Sisters, in the distance.

At the top of the hill across the footbridge on Coal Harbour, Lord Stanley invites us “to the use and enjoyment of people of all colours, creeds and customs for all time. ...” (Say, should that statue still be there? Should a British bloke welcome us to the park that is on unceded Musqueam, Squamish and Tsleil-Waututh land? Well, whatever, it’s a nice sentiment if you don’t consider the source.)

I mention the statue because I passed it often enough cycling from work downtown back home. As a daily commuter, I would occasionally take a break from the relentless noise of the causeway and dilly dally up the footbridge, past Lord Stanley, by Malkin Bowl, the arbutus garden, the petting zoo and then charge down Pipeline Road.

Rather than electing to ride on the roadway up the steep hill to the bridge entrance, I would deke across to the Hanson trail, a wide gravel path created to allow people in mobility assistance devices to access the real park. Named after Rick Hanson, this route suited me fine when it was light out and sometimes even in the dark when I wanted to feel the forest at night. There were the same two nesting ducks in a little pond that would appear in spring and disappear in summer. Once I saw a squirrel scolding an impassive porcupine lodged in a tall broadleaf maple. Banana slugs oozed along, oblivious. Birds. Magical quiet.

This must surely be what Lord Stanley was offering to all: a place for a natural respite from city life. He wasn’t thinking about theatres, restaurants, aquariums, a zoo, or busloads of tourists. He wasn’t thinking about parking revenues or traffic management. He was thinking that people might want to visit the park to leave the city behind. (Though he might have been OK with the cricket pitch.)

The real attraction of a park is not its “attractions.”

Riding a bicycle in the park isn’t really about transportation per se, though a few of us use it occasionally to return from the city to the North Shore. It’s more about recreating, experiencing the natural environment. Riding and walking through the park is a way to experience its majesty without bringing the city along. If it were up to me, we would shut the park to motorized vehicle traffic.

This does not need to be exclusionary. We can work out ways for people of all colours, creeds and customs to access Stanley Park’s leafy, beachy escapes. Electric tri-shaws can wheel the elderly, or people with disabilities or just people who choose that mode of travel. People with no accessibility challenges could take advantage of micro-mobility devices. We could build an electric shuttle service or an at-grade e-train to transport people to where they want to go. Or extend the existing public bus service throughout the park. Tourists could rent e-bikes, e-boards or e-scooters to replace the belching diesel buses. Living buses with multiple riders are super fun.

There are a million ways around traffic jams in X̱wáýx̱way-Stanley Park. Maintaining vehicle access is not one of them.
https://www.nsnews.com/opinion/columnist...art-of-stanley-park-s-purpose-1.24167909
     
     
  #18604  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2020, 9:28 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by jollyburger View Post
Lady thinks that Hanson Trail is named after Rick Hanson. This map from 1975 has the Hanson Trail on it.

https://searcharchives.vancouver.ca/stanley-park-227

I proclaim Stanley Park a nature reserve and ban all people and cyclists and cars from it.



https://www.nsnews.com/opinion/columnist...art-of-stanley-park-s-purpose-1.24167909
not to mention, his name is Rick Hansen; not Hanson. clearly not an article worth reading.
     
     
  #18605  
Old Posted Jul 12, 2020, 6:32 PM
rdave rdave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Spain
Posts: 111
Does anybody know when and if 601 Beach Crescent at Granville Bridge is still moving forward? Havent heard anything about it in a while and it would be nice to know when shovels will hit the ground there
     
     
  #18606  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 2:07 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,496
Current state of the northeast Granville Bridge loop.
BlackTop Cabs is still in the other loop.

Pic by me today:

     
     
  #18607  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 2:51 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
What's the plan for the loops? I hope something as nice as the triangle lots which are turning out superb!
     
     
  #18608  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 2:52 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,496
Nothing finalized.
There will be streets (former lanes) bisecting them.
     
     
  #18609  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 3:20 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,547
Perfect spot for a temporary homeless camp.
     
     
  #18610  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 3:49 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
What's the plan for the loops? I hope something as nice as the triangle lots which are turning out superb!
Top right image. No developments announced yet.



(CityDuo)
     
     
  #18611  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 6:31 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
Perfect spot for a temporary homeless camp.
Your hypocrisy and biasness are truly revealing. Why is this rundown spot: noisy, dusty, full of traffic exhaust, etc., perfect for the homeless? Is it because it is NOT in Olympic Village?

Recap your reply to Klazu:
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
When did you turn into such a poor-hating asshole?

I live in the area, and the modular home structure has had zero impact on crime (not that it was great before). I do see less people sleeping in the park though.

Last edited by Vin; Jul 20, 2020 at 6:49 PM.
     
     
  #18612  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 8:09 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,547
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
Your hypocrisy and biasness are truly revealing. Why is this rundown spot: noisy, dusty, full of traffic exhaust, etc., perfect for the homeless? Is it because it is NOT in Olympic Village?

Recap your reply to Klazu:
LOL get off your high horse. Please illustrate how my support for modular housing means I must like people sleeping in parks?
     
     
  #18613  
Old Posted Jul 20, 2020, 11:33 PM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
(CityDuo)
i have to say, i am not a fan of those loops being removed, and then adding in all those streets going through them. it honestly seems like an overkill of streets. the loops don't take up nearly that much space that they need a N/S & E/W through each of them.

they probably just want a chance to add in 2 new traffic signals on Pacific knowing the CoV...
     
     
  #18614  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 1:22 AM
rdave rdave is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2019
Location: Spain
Posts: 111
Not a fan of it either.
     
     
  #18615  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 2:07 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,042
IIRC it's in response to people wanting an easier connection to the seawall. The loops aren't bad, but unlike the rest of the bridge and ramps, I've never seen more than three vehicles a minute... so why not replace them with something more walk-friendly?
     
     
  #18616  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 3:42 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,547
The loops do get minimal use and aren't a great use of space.

With Vancouver House and potentially something on the other side, that area under the bridge will get a lot more walkable and pedestrian friendly.
     
     
  #18617  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 4:06 PM
dleung's Avatar
dleung dleung is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 6,531
Way too many new streets. They just needed to extend neon and rolston to pacific, and replace the crescent part with a more civic-scale staircase to the bridge on each side than what is there currently.
     
     
  #18618  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 4:47 PM
rofina rofina is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 5,149
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Way too many new streets. They just needed to extend neon and rolston to pacific, and replace the crescent part with a more civic-scale staircase to the bridge on each side than what is there currently.
I tend to agree. Quit wasting space with streets, build something fun and dense with a more walkable concept, its a tight area don't need to have streets crossing every way. Just need it for delivery and refuse disposal logistics and it should be fine.

That area could turn into a neat district given proper planning. Funky areas around bridges like that is what give character and uniqueness.
     
     
  #18619  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 5:01 PM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
Quote:
Originally Posted by rofina View Post
I tend to agree. Quit wasting space with streets, build something fun and dense with a more walkable concept, its a tight area don't need to have streets crossing every way. Just need it for delivery and refuse disposal logistics and it should be fine.

That area could turn into a neat district given proper planning. Funky areas around bridges like that is what give character and uniqueness.
Agreed. Anyone know where to write a letter to?
__________________
There is a housing crisis, and we simply need to speak up about it.

Pinterest - I use this social media platform to easily add pictures into my posts on this forum. Plus there are great architecture and city photos out there as well.
     
     
  #18620  
Old Posted Jul 21, 2020, 5:58 PM
whatnext whatnext is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 27,568
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
The loops do get minimal use and aren't a great use of space.

With Vancouver House and potentially something on the other side, that area under the bridge will get a lot more walkable and pedestrian friendly.
Unless those streets are signalled for turning, it will be distinctly unpedestrian friendly (ie. way more potential vehicle-pedestrian interaction points).
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:30 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.