HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2020, 3:58 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
You didn't solve anything, you hand waved away obvious problems and don't answer any questions. The existing VIA station is on the wrong side of the city accessible by a (likely slow) single track branch line, in the middle of nowhere. It's a crap location for a station so not the place to go.
Getting to downtown with VIA is not necessarily needed if there is a good way to get downtown by using higher order transit. So, lets say, moving the station to be connected to the LRT is only $1 million, where as getting it downtown would be in the order of $5 million, which is better? Both. Do the lower cost option first. Then once demand grows, build more.

Part of the idea is to make sure it connects to the Canadian as well. Having a "union" station is key to making VIA work better for major cities. Toronto, Ottawa and Montreal all have that figured out. So, why not do that in Edmonton? Ottawa's is out of the downtown core, but is connected to the LRT. It seems to do well. Why would we treat Edmonton any different?
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 12:10 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.