HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #681  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 3:07 PM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Loco101 View Post
So many people working in natural resources sectors can't understand that their types of jobs aren't stable and they have this mindset that their income will remain high for a long time. I see it all the time with many working in mining in Timmins and it obviously exists in the oil and gas sector.
More than half of Canadians have less than two weeks in the bank so this is something that’s across Canada not just in certain sectors. I still see people complaining about not being able to own a home after just maxing their credit card to take a vacation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #682  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 4:10 PM
CityTech CityTech is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
More than half of Canadians have less than two weeks in the bank so this is something that’s across Canada not just in certain sectors. I still see people complaining about not being able to own a home after just maxing their credit card to take a vacation.
Financial literacy is a really big problem. Especially among the poor. The kind of people who will go to the housing board and moan about how they didn't pay their rent because they can't afford it when they spent the equivalent of rent on booze and cigarettes.

I really think social assistance/welfare programs should come with mandatory financial literacy courses/counselling.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #683  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 4:25 PM
lio45 lio45 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Quebec
Posts: 44,901
I'm probably biased but I see no downsides to the following change to how welfare works: the share of the amount that's the recipient's monthly rent would go straight from the govt to the welfare recipient's landlord, and they'd get their welfare check for the rest. Then that (reduced) amount can still be blown on booze and cigarettes the very first day of the month.

Win-win-win, even for them (their lungs and livers will be grateful :p)

Evictions would be greatly reduced, and the general desirability of welfare recipients as tenants would be markedly increased (they'd now come with reliably guaranteed rent).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #684  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 4:33 PM
kwoldtimer kwoldtimer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Location: La vraie capitale
Posts: 26,216
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #685  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 6:28 PM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityTech View Post
Financial literacy is a really big problem. Especially among the poor. The kind of people who will go to the housing board and moan about how they didn't pay their rent because they can't afford it when they spent the equivalent of rent on booze and cigarettes.

I really think social assistance/welfare programs should come with mandatory financial literacy courses/counselling.
I’d support a stress test or minimum bank balance requirement to get a credit card. Also I think there should be a life class in high schools that teaches useful knowledge like financial planning, tax law, basic criminal laws, etc.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #686  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 7:18 PM
NetMapel's Avatar
NetMapel NetMapel is offline
Hello World
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 1,580
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
More than half of Canadians have less than two weeks in the bank so this is something that’s across Canada not just in certain sectors. I still see people complaining about not being able to own a home after just maxing their credit card to take a vacation.
Quite true but I also just want to say that there’s a difference between living pay cheque to pay cheque with a $50k salary versus $100k salary. Hence why I am far more sympathetic to your local Albertan teachers, bus drivers... etc than the high salary oil and gas workers. I believe their harsh working conditions earn themselves a high salary, but they should take personal financial responsibility. They wanted low government taxes which hinders the ability of their provincial government to have money to help their citizens in bad time like other places with higher taxes and better social systems. That should in turn make it an even bigger priority to save because you elected a government with that philosophy. Funny how. “financial conservatism” gets thrown out of the window on a personal level when that’s what conservatives want on a government level.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #687  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 7:33 PM
Dengler Avenue's Avatar
Dengler Avenue Dengler Avenue is offline
Road Engineer Wannabe
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: Côté Ouest de la Rivière des Outaouais
Posts: 8,682
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
I’d support a stress test or minimum bank balance requirement to get a credit card. Also I think there should be a life class in high schools that teaches useful knowledge like financial planning, tax law, basic criminal laws, etc.
Back when I went to high school in Richmond, B.C., there was a course called Senior Planning (Grade 11)... I guess we were simply too young to take it seriously.
__________________
My Proposal of TCH Twinning in Northern Ontario
Disclaimer: Most of it is pure pie in the sky, so there's no need to be up in the arm about it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #688  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 7:55 PM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Back when I went to high school in Richmond, B.C., there was a course called Senior Planning (Grade 11)... I guess we were simply too young to take it seriously.
We had CALM, career and life management, same thing never took it seriously. Just a stupid required 2 credit course was how it was thought of.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #689  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2019, 11:26 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Financial literacy is absolutely useless to Walmart as an employer. Get your heads out of the sand. The responsibility of the education system is to produce workers, not people, and if you're concerned that they're spending money on alcohol, Capitalism™ has the solution for you!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #690  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 4:45 PM
swimmer_spe swimmer_spe is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 10,743
Quote:
Originally Posted by misher View Post
More than half of Canadians have less than two weeks in the bank so this is something that’s across Canada not just in certain sectors. I still see people complaining about not being able to own a home after just maxing their credit card to take a vacation.
Quote:
Originally Posted by CityTech View Post
Financial literacy is a really big problem. Especially among the poor. The kind of people who will go to the housing board and moan about how they didn't pay their rent because they can't afford it when they spent the equivalent of rent on booze and cigarettes.

I really think social assistance/welfare programs should come with mandatory financial literacy courses/counselling.
Yet we have governments who either cut or spend but they do not show the financial repercussions.

Pick a platform. There is stuff in there, yet no plan of how to pay for it.

My favourites are the conservatives that want to cut taxes and increase spending. It does not make mathematical sense. The problem is, their base is so financial illiterate that it does even matter. They hear tax cut and vote for them.

Maybe what is needed to fix western alienation is financial literacy in the general public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #691  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 5:12 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
UCP is now trying to take 10% of Alberta's pension fund to fund its government programming. Since your pension is literally your wages, stashed away for use as income after you've worked, they're basically instituting a 10% tax increase on deferred wages.

Conservatives love the idea!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #692  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 5:32 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
UCP is now trying to take 10% of Alberta's pension fund to fund its government programming. Since your pension is literally your wages, stashed away for use as income after you've worked, they're basically instituting a 10% tax increase on deferred wages.

Conservatives love the idea!
Source? I mean, I wouldn't put it past them, but this is not something I have seen evidence is happening.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #693  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 6:34 PM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dengler Avenue View Post
Back when I went to high school in Richmond, B.C., there was a course called Senior Planning (Grade 11)... I guess we were simply too young to take it seriously.
I remember planning 10. In the end it wasn’t very good though. I definitely didn’t learn about tax brackets or criminal laws. I still remember an officer approaching me and a girl drinking on the beach and I had no idea it was illegal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #694  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 7:47 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Source? I mean, I wouldn't put it past them, but this is not something I have seen evidence is happening.
I made it up in order to take a shot at the UCP.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #695  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 8:06 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Source? I mean, I wouldn't put it past them, but this is not something I have seen evidence is happening.
http://www.assembly.ab.ca/ISYS/LADDAR_fi...ature_30/session_1/20190521_bill-022.pdf

Bill 22 amends several acts related to pensions, inserting the following into 5 of them:

Quote:
(5) The President of Treasury Board and Minister of Finance may by order authorize the Board to exclude from an investment management agreement under subsection (2), for a fixed or an indefinite period of time, specific investments or classes of investments of funds arising under this Act or underthe Board’s control but such investments must not make up more than 10% of the total value of the Board’s investments at the time the order is made, excluding investments made under subsection (4).
Which apparently gives the government the ability to access those 10% funds for general revenue? Public sector employees seem very upset about this. A pension is just your own wages, deferred in trust until retirement. All the more reason to abolish pensions and have everyone just chance it with the stock market, I suppose?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #696  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 9:14 PM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by vid View Post
http://www.assembly.ab.ca/ISYS/LADDAR_fi...ature_30/session_1/20190521_bill-022.pdf

Bill 22 amends several acts related to pensions, inserting the following into 5 of them:



Which apparently gives the government the ability to access those 10% funds for general revenue? Public sector employees seem very upset about this. A pension is just your own wages, deferred in trust until retirement. All the more reason to abolish pensions and have everyone just chance it with the stock market, I suppose?
That's quite the leap you're making. I take it you got this from a union site?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #697  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2019, 11:55 PM
vid's Avatar
vid vid is offline
I am a typical
 
Join Date: Apr 2004
Location: Thunder Bay
Posts: 39,065
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
That's quite the leap you're making. I take it you got this from a union site?
Alberta NDP.

So, yes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #698  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 2:56 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,624
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
That's quite the leap you're making. I take it you got this from a union site?
What is the reason or justification for that section of the Bill?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #699  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 3:32 AM
Corndogger Corndogger is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,727
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
What is the reason or justification for that section of the Bill?
I'm pretty sure it's not to use pension funds as a general revenue. More than likely it's so the government can control how up to 10% of the investments are invested. In other words, politically-motivated investments. If this going to be a repeat of the 1980s there will be a lot of push back. I follow a number of what I would consider very strong UCP supporters on Twitter. I would say most of them now are very disappointed in a lot of what the UCP has done or plans on doing. If they start fucking with people's pensions they'll pretty well guarantee that they'll be the second government in the province's history to be a one-term wonder.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #700  
Old Posted Nov 25, 2019, 5:12 AM
misher's Avatar
misher misher is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 4,537
Quote:
Originally Posted by Corndogger View Post
I'm pretty sure it's not to use pension funds as a general revenue. More than likely it's so the government can control how up to 10% of the investments are invested. In other words, politically-motivated investments. If this going to be a repeat of the 1980s there will be a lot of push back. I follow a number of what I would consider very strong UCP supporters on Twitter. I would say most of them now are very disappointed in a lot of what the UCP has done or plans on doing. If they start fucking with people's pensions they'll pretty well guarantee that they'll be the second government in the province's history to be a one-term wonder.
You mean there copying Quebec?
I see the UCP as doing some smart moves. Desperately trying to keep companies from leaving by lowering taxes. Reducing pension payments made by Albertans. Definitely don’t agree with getting rid of the elections commissioner but we do have police to do that too so there is an overlap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:18 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.