Quote:
Originally Posted by BrutallyDishonest2
Strawman.
The Centre of the Arts has multiple uses. The Globe does not.
|
Is it all that different though? The Center of the Arts generally has a higher price point for its events than the Globe. Is a concert by touring Canadian musicians, musicals performed by international casts, the RSO, or Drag Queens come October more worthy of a publicly funded amphitheatre than the Globe?
If anything is "rich" and "white" it's the RSO, or the touring Mamma Mia productions (to be fair, that happens at both), or Johnny Reid's seemingly annual Christmas tour, or the Nutcracker Ballet, etc.
Yes, there are other spaces in the Centre used for other purposes, but without the main amphitheatre, the structure wouldn't exist. And at that point, wouldn't the other warehouse-like convention spaces in the city (also largely government financed except for the hotels) serve the same purposes? I guess Telemiracle does happen once every 2 years though (except the equivalent venue in Saskatoon had similar funding, so make that annual for the Saskatchewan taxpayer). Or are we picking and choosing at this point to suit our own argumentative purposes?
If we didn't have the Centre of the Arts (funded by government decades ago), would you be rallying against it today using the same reasons you're using to oppose the Globe theatre maintenance/improvements?
I see it as less of a strawman argument and more of a comparative example that done decades ago is now seen as "acceptable" because it was done so far in the past that it's difficult to think of Regina without a similar venue (and back then it was an embarrassment that it took so long).