HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #6861  
Old Posted Aug 5, 2019, 7:50 PM
Meraki Meraki is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 473
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kisai View Post
Remember Hydrogen and Natural gas buses? Where did they go? The infrastructure didn't materialize. Remember the "hydrogen highway"? Infrastructure didn't materialize. This will not materialize either.
I agree with your post, but need to point out that CNG buses did indeed take off and are becoming a growing larger part of CMBC's fleet and others across North America.

For buses on the road right now in Metro Vancouver, diesel, hybrid, electric and natural gas are roughly split equally.
     
     
  #6862  
Old Posted Aug 6, 2019, 7:25 AM
WestCoastEcho WestCoastEcho is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Meraki View Post
I agree with your post, but need to point out that CNG buses did indeed take off and are becoming a growing larger part of CMBC's fleet and others across North America.

For buses on the road right now in Metro Vancouver, diesel, hybrid, electric and natural gas are roughly split equally.
That's because natural gas prices have fallen through the basement in North America since the first CNG buses were tested, making CNG actually cheaper than diesel.
     
     
  #6863  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2019, 8:41 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,094
EDITORIAL
Meet the Surrey SkyTrain – B.C.’s sequel to the Scarborough Subway

Less transit for more money – it’s the Canadian way.

The opening instalment of what has become a movie franchise debuted in Toronto nearly a decade ago, when a plan to build light rail transit (LRT) in Scarborough was transformed into a shorter, more expensive subway, serving fewer people. Spoiler alert: nothing’s been built, and the bill is still rising.

Audiences drawn to transit tragicomedies will want to catch the sequel, “Skytrain to Nowhere,” set in the Metro Vancouver municipality of Surrey. A sprawling suburban city of more than half-a-million people, it covers about as large an area as Vancouver, Richmond and Burnaby combined.

Surrey was designed for the car. Its population density is less than a third of that of Vancouver’s, but it’s growing fast. If most trips continue to be made by car, gridlock will ensue.

In a 2012 report on transit options, a dozen scenarios involving dedicated bus lanes, LRT and SkyTrain were proposed. The best plan – a cost-effective approach for covering ground, moving people and cutting emissions – appeared to be the bus system.

However, the regional mayors’ council for transit in 2014 endorsed an 11-kilometre LRT running south and east from Surrey Centre, where the SkyTrain line from Vancouver ends. At $1.6-billion, it wasn’t cheap, and it wasn’t perfect, but it was a good second choice. It gained provincial and federal financial backing, and construction was poised to begin.

Re-enter Doug McCallum. First elected Surrey’s mayor in 1995, he won two subsequent elections but lost in 2005. Last fall, he returned to office with a promise to ditch the LRT plan in favour of the worst option – extending a SkyTrain line through Surrey to Langley. Mr. McCallum claimed this could be done for $1.6-billion.

...

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/...in-bcs-sequel-to-the-scarborough-subway/
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #6864  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2019, 11:58 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
EDITORIAL
Meet the Surrey SkyTrain – B.C.’s sequel to the Scarborough Subway


https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/...in-bcs-sequel-to-the-scarborough-subway/
WOW - completely uninformed story.

It touts the Montreal REM as LRT.
The Montreal LRT will probably be the closest other system in Canada to SkyTrain when completed.
     
     
  #6865  
Old Posted Aug 7, 2019, 9:30 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,163
Yeah, even though s/he's decided to write anonymously, one can easily assume that this editor has never left Toronto.
     
     
  #6866  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 4:04 PM
aberdeen5698's Avatar
aberdeen5698 aberdeen5698 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 4,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
WOW - completely uninformed story.

It touts the Montreal REM as LRT.
The Montreal LRT will probably be the closest other system in Canada to SkyTrain when completed.
Well, Skytrain is LRT after all. It's original designation, "ALRT", stands for "Advanced Light Rapid Transit". You just have to compare the interior space of Skytrain cars to those of conventional heavy transit vehicles like those on the Toronto subway system to see the difference.
     
     
  #6867  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 4:18 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Well, Skytrain is LRT after all. It's original designation, "ALRT", stands for "Advanced Light Rapid Transit". You just have to compare the interior space of Skytrain cars to those of conventional heavy transit vehicles like those on the Toronto subway system to see the difference.
I thought the A was for Automated. Learn something new every day.
     
     
  #6868  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 4:53 PM
Urbanmetro Urbanmetro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 219
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
EDITORIAL
Meet the Surrey SkyTrain – B.C.’s sequel to the Scarborough Subway

Less transit for more money – it’s the Canadian way.

The opening instalment of what has become a movie franchise debuted in Toronto nearly a decade ago, when a plan to build light rail transit (LRT) in Scarborough was transformed into a shorter, more expensive subway, serving fewer people. Spoiler alert: nothing’s been built, and the bill is still rising.

Audiences drawn to transit tragicomedies will want to catch the sequel, “Skytrain to Nowhere,” set in the Metro Vancouver municipality of Surrey. A sprawling suburban city of more than half-a-million people, it covers about as large an area as Vancouver, Richmond and Burnaby combined.

Surrey was designed for the car. Its population density is less than a third of that of Vancouver’s, but it’s growing fast. If most trips continue to be made by car, gridlock will ensue.

In a 2012 report on transit options, a dozen scenarios involving dedicated bus lanes, LRT and SkyTrain were proposed. The best plan – a cost-effective approach for covering ground, moving people and cutting emissions – appeared to be the bus system.

However, the regional mayors’ council for transit in 2014 endorsed an 11-kilometre LRT running south and east from Surrey Centre, where the SkyTrain line from Vancouver ends. At $1.6-billion, it wasn’t cheap, and it wasn’t perfect, but it was a good second choice. It gained provincial and federal financial backing, and construction was poised to begin.

Re-enter Doug McCallum. First elected Surrey’s mayor in 1995, he won two subsequent elections but lost in 2005. Last fall, he returned to office with a promise to ditch the LRT plan in favour of the worst option – extending a SkyTrain line through Surrey to Langley. Mr. McCallum claimed this could be done for $1.6-billion.

...

https://www.theglobeandmail.com/opinion/...in-bcs-sequel-to-the-scarborough-subway/
Couldn't agree more with the opinion of the writer of this article. 1.6 billion for a train to Fleetwood surrey is crazy especially with much of the train passing by nothing but a forest.

Brt is more than enough to handle service to the expo line from east surrey and langley. Imagine what 3.2 billion can build for brt to increase service in Surrey, Langley, Burnaby, vancouver. I don't understand why people are pushing for sky train in far to reach places with no big employment area or civic / institutional.
     
     
  #6869  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 5:37 PM
s211 s211 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,516
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanmetro View Post
I don't understand why people are pushing for sky train in far to reach places with no big employment area or civic / institutional.
"It's still ok, because it's aspirational!!!"

(plagarized from Gregor's go-to phrase when irrational targets were set and then widely missed)
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #6870  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 8:31 PM
CanSpice's Avatar
CanSpice CanSpice is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Location: New Westminster, BC
Posts: 2,723
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanmetro View Post
Brt is more than enough to handle service to the expo line from east surrey and langley. Imagine what 3.2 billion can build for brt to increase service in Surrey, Langley, Burnaby, vancouver. I don't understand why people are pushing for sky train in far to reach places with no big employment area or civic / institutional.
Because they're planning for the next 25 years and beyond, not just for the next five. If you look at Metro 2040 you'll see Metro Vancouver has identified seven Regional City Centres, which they say "provide good locations to distribute growth across the region while connecting to the larger Metro Centres". SkyTrain or SeaBus currently reach five of them. The last two are Maple Ridge and Langley.

Is BRT going to be a better solution than SkyTrain over the next 25-30 years?
     
     
  #6871  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 8:39 PM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,732
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Well, Skytrain is LRT after all. It's original designation, "ALRT", stands for "Advanced Light Rapid Transit". You just have to compare the interior space of Skytrain cars to those of conventional heavy transit vehicles like those on the Toronto subway system to see the difference.
Yeah, but my point was that the article touted the virtues of the REM, while bashing SkyTrain, despite the fact they are roughly THE SAME.

Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
"It's still ok, because it's aspirational!!!"

(plagarized from Gregor's go-to phrase when irrational targets were set and then widely missed)
Standard chicken and egg argument.

Do you build to induce growth (like M-Line @ Brentwood and Lougheed), or build to serve existing growth.

Remember when the Millennium Line was a line to nowhere?
The growth along that line (largely due to Burnaby's Town Centre planning) has shown the benefit of building for the future.
Coquitlam is also planning a lot of densification too.
As a side benefit, there are no NIMBYs to upset because the residents come after the line is in place.

There's no reason to think that Fleetwood or Langley would be any different.
     
     
  #6872  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 9:11 PM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,098
Quote:
Originally Posted by Urbanmetro View Post
Brt is more than enough to handle service to the expo line from east surrey and langley. Imagine what 3.2 billion can build for brt to increase service in Surrey, Langley, Burnaby, vancouver. I don't understand why people are pushing for sky train in far to reach places with no big employment area or civic / institutional.
Spend all those 3.2 billions in building BRT and you'll see TransLink go bankrupt within 5 years.

Buses are expensive to operate compare to train, while providing much less capacity for the equal amount of money spent in operation.

Imagine each BRT line cost 100 million to build and 12 million a year to operation (in line with 95 B-Line or most of the upcoming rapid bus, but much less than the 99 B-Line)... then that's 32 lines at a cost of 384 millions a year. Assuming TransLink only contribute to the regional portion of 20% on new transit line... then the cost of operating those BRT would've paid for an almost 2 billion SkyTrain line every year!!

If there is no huge operation cost attached to buses, wouldn't you think that TransLink already be running tens of thousands of buses that filled every corner of Metro Vancouver by now?
     
     
  #6873  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2019, 10:09 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Spend all those 3.2 billions in building BRT and you'll see TransLink go bankrupt within 5 years.

Buses are expensive to operate compare to train, while providing much less capacity for the equal amount of money spent in operation.

Imagine each BRT line cost 100 million to build and 12 million a year to operation (in line with 95 B-Line or most of the upcoming rapid bus, but much less than the 99 B-Line)... then that's 32 lines at a cost of 384 millions a year. Assuming TransLink only contribute to the regional portion of 20% on new transit line... then the cost of operating those BRT would've paid for an almost 2 billion SkyTrain line every year!!

If there is no huge operation cost attached to buses, wouldn't you think that TransLink already be running tens of thousands of buses that filled every corner of Metro Vancouver by now?
IIRC it's not the bus that's expensive, it's the lack of automation and low capacity; can't move as many passengers, can't make enough revenue to justify the frequent service or additional driver salaries.

Same reason most light rail systems have an equally high operating cost compared to their driverless counterparts, and why SkyTrain has an operating profit. BRT and LRT would bleed money on most routes in Vancouver.
     
     
  #6874  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 1:24 AM
jbrizzy jbrizzy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 129
Quote:
Originally Posted by aberdeen5698 View Post
Well, Skytrain is LRT after all. It's original designation, "ALRT", stands for "Advanced Light Rapid Transit". You just have to compare the interior space of Skytrain cars to those of conventional heavy transit vehicles like those on the Toronto subway system to see the difference.
LRT stands for "Light Rail Transit," which is a step below true rapid transit, including both heavy metro and light metro systems (of which SkyTrain is one).
     
     
  #6875  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 6:16 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,974
An offensive waste of money and an affront to people SoF. This has EVERYTHING to do with real estate development and ribbon cutting ceremonies and absolutely NOTHING to do with transit planning. This has politics written all over it..........Surrey agreed to the Broadway Subway only if MacCallum got his SkyTrain extension.

The vast majority of people SoF also work and/or go to schools SoF. The SoF needs superior transit to connect it to itslef not a stump to shave 4 minutes off the trip to NoF which is all this does. It serves nearly no one, goes by no major employers, colleges, universities, or even high density neighbourhoods. This line is akin to building the Evergreen Line from just Lougheed to Port Moody.
     
     
  #6876  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 7:44 AM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,163
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
An offensive waste of money and an affront to people SoF. This has EVERYTHING to do with real estate development and ribbon cutting ceremonies and absolutely NOTHING to do with transit planning. This has politics written all over it..........Surrey agreed to the Broadway Subway only if MacCallum got his SkyTrain extension.

The vast majority of people SoF also work and/or go to schools SoF. The SoF needs superior transit to connect it to itslef not a stump to shave 4 minutes off the trip to NoF which is all this does. It serves nearly no one, goes by no major employers, colleges, universities, or even high density neighbourhoods. This line is akin to building the Evergreen Line from just Lougheed to Port Moody.
A Port Moody extension immediately followed by a Coquitlam extension 4-7 years later would be more than fine; in the case of Fleetwood, said extension and a follow-up to Langley would attract over 60k daily riders in ten years, make it significantly easier rework Surrey's bus routes into a grid, enable easier transfers across the region, and generate a profit that'd greatly help subsidize future transit improvements. Others have pointed these out repeatedly. You appear to be intent on ignoring them.

Exactly what, according to your infinite wisdom, provides something better for Surrey? Because the Valley Line and Newton extensions sure as shit don't.
     
     
  #6877  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 4:21 PM
SFUVancouver's Avatar
SFUVancouver SFUVancouver is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 6,708
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
An offensive waste of money and an affront to people SoF. This has EVERYTHING to do with real estate development and ribbon cutting ceremonies and absolutely NOTHING to do with transit planning. This has politics written all over it..........Surrey agreed to the Broadway Subway only if MacCallum got his SkyTrain extension.

The vast majority of people SoF also work and/or go to schools SoF. The SoF needs superior transit to connect it to itslef not a stump to shave 4 minutes off the trip to NoF which is all this does. It serves nearly no one, goes by no major employers, colleges, universities, or even high density neighbourhoods. This line is akin to building the Evergreen Line from just Lougheed to Port Moody.
This is illustrative of what people don't seem to understand about the network effect of expanding the SkyTrain network. This extension directly connects to downtown Surrey, including SFU Surrey, the Civic precinct, and the Hospital Precinct, which I think you will agree count as major employers, colleges, universities, and high density neighbourhoods.

Furthermore, B-Line service connects to Newton and Guildford and can be easily upgraded to offer the same travel time and capacity as a LRT at a small fraction of the cost. It also directly connects to the entire SkyTrain network and all of its constellation of major employers, colleges, universities, and high-density neighbourhoods. Translink will obviously ramp-up local bus service tying into the extension and may ultimately add additional B-Lines serving SOF and tying into the SkyTrain extension(s). It's willful ignorance to look at this 7km extension in isolation, as if the trains stop before King George.

You prove my point in your last sentence. The Evergreen Line was never considered to be a Lougheed Station to Coquitlam line, it was a seamless new armature on the SkyTrain network.
__________________
VANCOUVER | Beautiful, Multicultural | Canada's Pacific Metropolis

Last edited by SFUVancouver; Aug 9, 2019 at 5:32 PM.
     
     
  #6878  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 7:16 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by ssiguy View Post
It serves nearly no one, goes by no major employers, colleges, universities, or even high density neighbourhoods. This line is akin to building the Evergreen Line from just Lougheed to Port Moody.
That's, unfortunately, a pretty ignorant opinion based entirely in no facts because for your claim to be an accurate argument against SkyTrain extension, you're in essence also saying the current SkyTrain network is pointless.

Are you? I mean does current SkyTrain go to UBC? No. Does it go to SFU Burnaby? No. Does it go by BCIT? No. How about any of the satellite campuses in Vancouver/Richmond? No.

So what major campuses does SkyTrain currently go right by? VCC and SFU Surrey. While I think it is a disservice not to serve major education locations, it hasn't been a requirement for the previous SkyTrain lines so why does it suddenly have to be a requirement for Surrey's extension? And Trinity Western doesn't count. It has about as many students as some high schools have in Surrey and is a private religious institution. Only major campus I would be for having mass transit would be Kwantlen and they would be hugely served by having SkyTrain down Fraser Highway to Langley City both to service its Langley campus (not far from terminus) and its Cloverdale location (a bus ride down 176th or from Langley City down HWY 10 after bus reconfigurations).

Same with density. Every other city serviced by SkyTrain, the backbone of this network, has been able to get a line BEFORE densifying, yet always Surrey has to be super dense before it deserves it? Ridiculous.

What about major employers? Well if you want to be specific, there are many major employers not next to SkyTrain today so that was never a requirement in the past, but I'd counter-argue that being in a City Center itself is equivalent to being near the major employers.

A SkyTrain extension to Langley City puts that entire line and many KM between them in direct link to Surrey Central which itself is a major employer center and growing yearly. It also extends the reach to those that do commute out of SoF and would allow Translinks to reconfigure the bus network to be less "Vancouver centric" and more "backbone inter-center" centric.

Buses today in Surrey are mainly geared toward getting you to Surrey Central. I had to take a bus from my place in Surrey Central on Fraser Highway to a location in Guildford. I had two transit choices, walk all the way to the B-line and take it to Guildford then walk another 2 km to my destination. Or take a bus down Fraser Highway to 152nd then switch buses to one down 152nd to my destination.

I chose the second as Google said it would be fastest and it took me 1 hour to get to my destination including waiting for 2 buses on both legs. FYI it takes 45 minutes for me to WALK the entire distance so it would have been quicker for me just to walk the entire way than take the buses except for the fact I had a 3 year old with me so walking would have been a pain. For the record it takes 5 minutes to drive the same route but car wasn't actually an option in this instance.

Our bus system is designed stupidly because it is Vancouver centric as the only mass transit point is in the top left corner. That needs to be changed and this would change it drastically.

Finally, you said a vast majority of SoF residents work SoF also. Vast majority is an overstatement and not based in actual fact. It is a majority, but VAST makes it sound more than it is.

Last statistics show that 45% of Surrey residents live and work in Surrey, 8% in Delta, and 5ish % in other SoF areas. That is 58% of Surrey residents living and working in Surrey. That still means 42% of residents work NoF. which is NOT an insignificant amount of people nor would I classify 58% as vast.

That's different for Township of Langley residents. The VAST majority of them DO work SoF as only 6% work in Vancouver. So that means having a mass transit between there and Surrey would largely benefit them because the bus grid could also be adjusted there to reflect the new mass transit SkyTrain backbone. It would also be a boon to Surrey Central building up commercial and business demand further pulling jobs out to SoF to the benefit of Surrey residents and even further locations like Abbotsford and the Fraser Valley.

Any other solution including the inter-urban which is just a glorified West Coast Express and only would in-reality serve people working and commuting between major city destinations is just not based in any reality. Looks amazing on paper but in practice is a really clueless solution. I would also caution everyone that any initiative that includes Bill Vander Zalm should be avoided at all cost. Just look up his track record (I lived it btw) and you'll see that pretty much all his initiatives as a disgraced Premier who had to resign have been detrimental to tax-payers including his after politics fight against to kill the HST and his introduction as Premier of the Property Transfer Tax which contributes to housing affordability issues we all enjoy today.
     
     
  #6879  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2019, 7:30 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,593
Quote:
Originally Posted by jhausner View Post
A SkyTrain extension to Langley City puts that entire line and many KM between them in direct link to Surrey Central which itself is a major employer center and growing yearly. It also extends the reach to those that do commute out of SoF and would allow Translinks to reconfigure the bus network to be less "Vancouver centric" and more "backbone inter-center" centric.

...

Our bus system is designed stupidly because it is Vancouver centric as the only mass transit point is in the top left corner. That needs to be changed and this would change it drastically.
     
     
  #6880  
Old Posted Aug 10, 2019, 12:45 AM
officedweller officedweller is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,732
Check out the Q&A from 1991 for the Lougheed/Coquitlam Extension.
All that's old is new again...


https://orangeraisin.files.wordpress.com...m-extension-pamphlet-bc-transit-1991.pdf
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:10 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.