Quote:
Originally Posted by chrisel
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller
Makes sense to put the office space on the noisier street, but then you have residential encroaching onto the light industrial spaces to the east.
Here's the location.
Note the proximity to Red Truck Brewing and the adjacent office application.
But there is residential (live-work) on the south side of 2nd Ave/GNW in the area.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by TheTerminalCity
Appears to be a one-off under the Flats plan for this corner
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Changing City
That makes sense, because the rest of the south side of E 1st is zoned for 'artist live-work' - which are mostly impossible to distinguish from condos. Quite a few sites have already been built.
|
This project is in a small 'one off' area IC-2A where upto 140 ft is allowed conditionally.
Adjacent running along 1st Eastward until about Thornton on the south side of the street is IC-3A, which the Flats plan rezoned to be conditional for residential up to 100ft and so it does sort of make some sense to have the east side be residential. The city has essentially incentivized the redevelopment of this area along 1st into residential. They allowed 'micro lofts' as well. There hasn't been much redevelopment yet, (just one proposal?) but I'm sure there will be soon.
The Mount Pleasant plan talks a lot about a 'hill town' character and stepping down in the heights of buildings along the slope of the hill to preserve views, but then the Flats plan basically ignores this and increases the heights again directly across the street. I dunno how the city is supposed to reconcile this or if they'll just ignore this conflict between the plans.