Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian
Well, since this is a skyline thread, on a skyscraper site... yes.
|
That's about as reasonable as saying "this is a skyline thread, on a skyscraper site... " so we all agree that all buildings should be skyscrapers - up up and away, as high as we can go. Extrude it all, even the detached houses. Nonsense.
So,
Calgarian, how about trying again with some thoughts about cities having different characters relative to high rise construction. Example: central Richmond has become a unique high density environment which, by restricted heights, has developed a somewhat unique typology which relates in different ways to street space and the public realm (parks, squares, entries) as compared to the typical suburban high-rise clusters that dot Metro. It is not interesting so much because its 'different,' but because its difference is producing its own kind of urbanity. In fact, it is probably established to a degree that could accommodate taller buildings; they would likely take a form that was a bit different than the approach being taken at Metrotown, Brentwood, Coquitlam Centre . . .