HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #321  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 12:28 AM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,857
I remember the little blue "CN Bedford" building. I just figured one of the red buildings was a reno. Your link also shows a photo of the tiny Armdale stop. They say about the stops circa 1990:

"By this time all RDC services but not the Atlantic stopped on signal at Armdale, Rockingham and Bedford."

Which makes me think the Ocean did stop at these small stations back then. Wikipedia claims that the Ocean from Montreal-Halifax is the longest-operating passenger train in North America. It's been running since 1904. Of course it's debatable what does or does not constitute the same train or continuous service.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #322  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 1:16 AM
Taeolas Taeolas is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 5,055
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I was talking about the new route that was created, which was the portion that runs west of the fork near Fairview Cove. The eastern route running through the North End is the older route that existed prior to the 1910's (maybe the original ICR route?).
I saw that part, and the trench is visible on Google Maps. I followed that trench through Fairview Cove all the way out to Cobequid road where the first at grade crossing happens. The trench is impressive; that it gets that far without any real road crossings is also impressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #323  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 1:59 AM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,276
Yeah there are no at-grade crossings for that route anywhere in the Halifax urban/suburban area. The first one is well into the exurban/rural surroundings. That's actually the exurban community of Windsor Junction rather than the suburb of Lower Sackville.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #324  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 5:21 AM
Urban_Sky Urban_Sky is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2018
Location: Montreal
Posts: 500
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
There used to be one. It is now a small red building near the Bedford Highway and First Ave. I think it might have been used up until the 90's or so. I think there might have been a Rockingham stop at one point too.

Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark View Post
I remember the old station being there in the 1990s, but can't recall when it finished being used as a passenger stop. I'm thinking probably in the 1980s or early '90s when dayliner/short run service stopped.

Bedford Station

Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I remember the little blue "CN Bedford" building. I just figured one of the red buildings was a reno. Your link also shows a photo of the tiny Armdale stop. They say about the stops circa 1990:

"By this time all RDC services but not the Atlantic stopped on signal at Armdale, Rockingham and Bedford."

Which makes me think the Ocean did stop at these small stations back then. Wikipedia claims that the Ocean from Montreal-Halifax is the longest-operating passenger train in North America. It's been running since 1904. Of course it's debatable what does or does not constitute the same train or continuous service.
I'm afraid I won’t be able to answer all the other interesting points raised in the meanwhile before my next weekendly round-up, but this one is relatively easy to answer (at least if you have a CN/CP/VIA timetable database):

Compiled from: Historic CN and VIA timetables
Note: shown are all stations between Halifax and Truro which still had scheduled passenger stops in April 1950. Station abandonment dates only provided for those stations which survived into the VIA era, but they can be derived by comparing the various CN timetables I've linked above...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #325  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 11:43 AM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,391
Thanks very much for that great info!

There were a lot of stops in 1950, but still quite a few right into the 1980s. I'm thinking those stops must have added a lot of time to the trip to Truro.

By the time I took my first trip on the train in the late 1990s (the blue/grey Bedford building was still there to announce that we were passing through Bedford) all those stops were gone.

Incidentally, on that first trip we were delayed a couple of hours because the train struck a car at one of those Windsor Junction level crossings discussed above. Thankfully it only caught the front end of the car, so nobody was injured, but I did see quite a bit of debris strewn about as we passed as it did tear up the front of the car badly. It was a dramatic first trip on the train, and it was only to Moncton, but I recall the scenery from the train was new and interesting as I had only traveled by roadway previous to that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #326  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 11:48 AM
ghYHZ ghYHZ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Antigonish NS
Posts: 496
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas View Post
I saw that part, and the trench is visible on Google Maps.........
The w/b Ocean departing Halifax through the trench.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #327  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 2:38 PM
milomilo milomilo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 10,498
Beautiful. Looks like a railway in England rather than in Canada, although the rails look like the 19th century originals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #328  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 3:13 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is offline
Volatile Pacivist
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Location: Nova Scotia
Posts: 11,276
I'm still mad that they got rid of the second track in the cut. Completely unnecessary imo. Not only does it make the possibility of commuter rail more costly, but the last few times I was on the train the travel between Halifax and Bedford was very slow going with speeds reduced to walking level for about 10 minutes and it even had to stop for a couple min at one point, I assume because of other train movements. If a potential commuter rail service is like that, I can't see it being very popular.
__________________
"The reasonable man adapts himself to the world; the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man." - George Bernard Shaw
Don't ask people not to debate a topic. Just stop making debatable assertions. Problem solved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #329  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 3:29 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by ghYHZ View Post
Is it just me or does anyone else cringe when they see a large stainless steel Park Car on the end of a Renaissance train (with smaller, European cars)? Not only do the colour schemes not match, but they are also different sizes. In fact they need to add a transition car to allow them to be coupled together (notice the second last car has most of the windows filed in). Don't get me wrong, I love the Park Cars, and I am sure they are a great addition for the passengers, but pictures of the train look off IMHO.

This will be a temporary issue as the Renaissance cars are reaching their end of life and their soft carbon steel construction make them not worth refurbishing (they are rusting badly). I read somewhere that Amtrak are considering replacing their original Superliner trains (built between 1975–1981). If they do, it could be a good opportunity for VIA to piggyback on an order for some replacement long distance cars.

Here is the above picture cropped for a better look at what I mean.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #330  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 3:42 PM
Ottawaresident Ottawaresident is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jan 2019
Location: Guess! Hint: It's in my username
Posts: 317
That is ugly! If only VIA Rail was operated like Amtrak, with subsidies but trying to get more passengers. Read: I'm American.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #331  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 3:48 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
The Renaissance cars demonstrate the Canadian mentality regarding passenger rail in a nutshell. "What's that, your fleet is falling apart? Here's some money so you can go and get some slightly used clearance cars built to someone else's specs for a million bucks a pop. They will be a constant headache and you won't get twenty years out of them, but hey, at least they have wheels?"

And yes, not that aesthetics are a priority for VIA, but the Park Car tagged on to a Renaissance train looks like crap.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #332  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 4:25 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,391
The switchover to the smaller cars was a huge downgrade for space and comfort when it happened. Hopefully they will upgrade again once the Renaissance cars are done. I wonder if they held onto the old Budd cars, and if it would be possible to refurbish them?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #333  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 4:31 PM
OldDartmouthMark OldDartmouthMark is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2010
Posts: 10,391
Regarding the Halifax rail cut, here's an excellent blog post by skycraper member Ziobrop:
https://halifaxbloggers.ca/builthalifax/2015/03/south-end-rail-cut/

Related is a post about the Hotel Nova Scotia and CN rail station:
https://halifaxbloggers.ca/builthalifax/...el-nova-scotia-and-the-cn-train-station/

...and a tie-in to the Ocean Terminals:
https://halifaxbloggers.ca/builthalifax/2015/03/the-halifax-ocean-terminals/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #334  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 4:50 PM
ghYHZ ghYHZ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Antigonish NS
Posts: 496
Say what you will about the Rens….but for the comfort and smooth riding qualities….. I’ll take a Ren anyday over that old Budd stuff. Solid partitions and doors that don’t vibrate and rattle compared to the paper thin walls and partitions of the Budds.

Also the Rens have an annex with toilet (including a private shower in some rooms) The Double Bedrooms on the Budds do have a toilet annex but the shower is down the hall…...and if you’re in a Single Bedroom….that toilet is in the same room with you (surrounded by all that carpet!!)

Just a much more enjoyable trip on the Rens….and I’ve been riding trains between Montreal and Halifax for 40+ years.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #335  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 4:59 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is online now
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,857
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
I'm still mad that they got rid of the second track in the cut. Completely unnecessary imo. Not only does it make the possibility of commuter rail more costly, but the last few times I was on the train the travel between Halifax and Bedford was very slow going with speeds reduced to walking level for about 10 minutes and it even had to stop for a couple min at one point, I assume because of other train movements. If a potential commuter rail service is like that, I can't see it being very popular.
Maybe the second track will be restored if commuter rail happens.

I heard a rumour the track removal happened because CN is taxed according to how much track it owns. Sounds plausible since they physically tore the track up instead of letting it slowly deteriorate.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #336  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 5:13 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 41,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
Maybe the second track will be restored if commuter rail happens.

I heard a rumour the track removal happened because CN is taxed according to how much track it owns. Sounds plausible since they physically tore the track up instead of letting it slowly deteriorate.
Yes and yes.

Commuter rail absolutely will require double tracking.
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #337  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 5:16 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
Considering the ROWs are in place, restoring another set of tracks probably won't be a significant obstacle to commuter rail.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #338  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 5:16 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 41,100
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
The Renaissance cars demonstrate the Canadian mentality regarding passenger rail in a nutshell. "What's that, your fleet is falling apart? Here's some money so you can go and get some slightly used clearance cars built to someone else's specs for a million bucks a pop. They will be a constant headache and you won't get twenty years out of them, but hey, at least they have wheels?"
It’s Canadian government procurement mentality in general - <cough> Australian fighter jets <cough>. Hey, they got wings and they can fly right? We might be able to get 10-15 years out of them.............
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #339  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 6:11 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post
It’s Canadian government procurement mentality in general - <cough> Australian fighter jets <cough>. Hey, they got wings and they can fly right? We might be able to get 10-15 years out of them.............
And don't forget those used British Submarines we bought. They sink, so they should work for us.

The good news is VIA is finally getting nice new trains for corridor use.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #340  
Old Posted Feb 27, 2019, 6:15 PM
roger1818's Avatar
roger1818 roger1818 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Stittsville, ON
Posts: 6,610
Quote:
Originally Posted by someone123 View Post
I heard a rumour the track removal happened because CN is taxed according to how much track it owns. Sounds plausible since they physically tore the track up instead of letting it slowly deteriorate.
If we want to preserve our rail right of ways, we need to stop applying property tax to them. Do our municipalities tax the Province for the highways?

The other reason for removing the track is so that they can sell/reuse the rail. The price has dropped more recently (though it is recovering), but about 5 years ago steal was very expensive and you could get good money for it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:33 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.