Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster
I was speaking with Jon Stovell the other day and the original proposal to the City was for 550 ft but the planning department introduced the shadowing restrictions during the process and the building was cut down.
Incredibly frustrating considering the shadows that prohibit the height are during the winter when very few people will be at the park and the sun is rarely out.
|
Well that is depressing.
The city took one step forward to just take two steps back.
So we could have had a new tallest office tower at 168m, instead we are getting another 115m-ish table top stub.
As I inquired before, are any of the identified higher building sites free of these new restrictions? Or was that entire process just a waste of everyone’s time?