HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Dec 18, 2018, 5:02 PM
BlaineN BlaineN is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 472
Actually that's not true, it happens all the time. It's just as common as it is in North America.
Smaller teams throughout Europe leaving to move to other cities, or other stadiums within the same city over financial disagreements is fairly common.

It doesn't happen with the super teams like RM, Barca, Man U, Bayern, etc.. but that would be like Leaf or Habs moving, or the NY Yankees moving.

Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
Troll.

But it is interesting how in Europe the whole 'team threatening to leave city thing' isn't a thing. The idea of Manchester United packing up and moving to Birmingham is absurd, and the result is that local cities don't have to pick up the tab when a team decides their original tax payer paid for head office isn't good enough anymore, and the cost of sports facilities is more reasonable.

worth it.

Sports teams are private enterprises, but they offer a public benefit that's different than a regular corporation. A large amount of people in Calgary will use an arena for some purpose at some point. Even if you're not a hockey fan, there's a good chance you're a music fan. Without a pro sports team like the Flames there is no reason or financially viable business case to build an arena, so forget about concerts, monster truck rallys, lacrosse games, or ice capades, etc...

All those who think we'd be better off without the Flames need to realize that the only way we'd have ever gotten an arena in the first place or will ever get a new arena is 100% with public money. At least with a pro sports team you can have someone else pay for part of it, and also have someone else be responsible for operating it and owning a depreciating asset.

Quote:
Originally Posted by milomilo View Post
It doesn't have to be this way, if cities just didn't give in to their demands the sports corporations would have to operate like normal businesses. So if the Flames do decide to throw their toys out the pram, despite the very generous offer from the city, then they shouldn't let the door hit them on their way out. Whatever marginal economic cost we pay (don't believe what the Flames say about their value to the city) would be worth it.

Last edited by BlaineN; Dec 18, 2018 at 5:14 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:46 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.