HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3161  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 6:40 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,297
Here it is.

Quote:
Originally Posted by wardlow View Post
The tower itself is set back from Main further than 360 Main. Not as bulky as 360 (or the original tower for the 300 site shown in the 1970s concept plan), which I like. More elegant.


***
Also, the 1913 recession ended Winnipeg's run at the head of Canada's tall building pack, and I don't think we're about to catch up any time soon. But that bothers me about as much as a resident of Austin or Nashville is bothered their respective city doesn't have any buildings taller than 200 metres. That is to say, not at all.

Continuing to see smaller/shorter projects that redevelop underbuilt sites (apartments going up on Roslyn Rd behind Safeway) or giant historic craters (True North Square) is just fine with me. You might not be able to see this change while driving into Winnipeg on McPhillips, or even from the postcard spot on Tache, but you sure can see it when you're walking around the city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3162  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 6:41 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,297
Looks like 11 units per floor of varying sizes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3163  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 6:51 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Any word on the top floor(s)? Is it amenity space?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3164  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:12 PM
Wpg_Guy's Avatar
Wpg_Guy Wpg_Guy is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Winnipeg, Manitoba
Posts: 7,844





300 Main (@300_main) on Instagram
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3165  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:28 PM
dmacc dmacc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2017
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 1,712
What is that steel frame for? I can't think of what purpose it would serve.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3166  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:47 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,297
It was mentioned it may be for the slip form type system they will be suing for the rest of the core. Keeps everything aligned properly. Not sure if slip form is the right term. Jack form was mentioned. I think slip form is a continuous pour like a grain elevator. Where as this will be raised floor by floor.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3167  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 7:47 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,297
Here's an image I marked up with my interpretation of where the tower will actually sit. The south side on the other end of the core will be one gridline outwards, like the north side.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3168  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 8:05 PM
rkspec rkspec is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Posts: 769
^^^

Thanks, now that is what i needed!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3169  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 8:18 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,297
I'm second guessing if it should go out a bit further along the main st side. This is only for the tower of course. The podium with the restaurant will go right out to the sidewalk.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3170  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 8:38 PM
plrh plrh is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 946
Quote:
Originally Posted by dmacc View Post
What is that steel frame for? I can't think of what purpose it would serve.
Probably a temporary roof for concrete pours. Gotta keep it warm for a week before you can start working on top of it.

Last edited by plrh; Dec 13, 2018 at 9:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3171  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 8:44 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Wpg_Guy View Post




300 Main (@300_main) on Instagram
The federal building (across the street) almost looks like it's top was lopped off, wonder if in the original design that if the tower part was to go higher?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3172  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2018, 10:09 PM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,821
From what I can find on the internet it was designed to look that way. It was also a depression era fed govt jobs project so that may also explain why it looks that way.

Makes a design statement but not too expensive to build.

Last edited by cllew; Dec 14, 2018 at 1:42 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3173  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 12:15 AM
roccerfeller's Avatar
roccerfeller roccerfeller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: BC
Posts: 2,932
Quote:
Originally Posted by Biff View Post
Board at work (updated)

Just gonna repost this beautiful work up by Biff to oogle at
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3174  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 4:22 AM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
^ Wow! Great job roc!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3175  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 4:50 AM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
The federal building (across the street) almost looks like it's top was lopped off, wonder if in the original design that if the tower part was to go higher?
That top part used to be the residence for the workers who kept the furnaces going with coal. No idea what's up there now, would probably make a killer boardroom. Apparently the inside is stunning, and a lot of restoration happened about 5 years ago. A shame no one really ever get to see it that doesn't work there. Hopefully as that strip gets busier, more people check it out.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3176  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 4:46 PM
Arts Arts is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 583
Federal (Victory) Building

Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
That top part used to be the residence for the workers who kept the furnaces going with coal. No idea what's up there now, would probably make a killer boardroom. Apparently the inside is stunning, and a lot of restoration happened about 5 years ago. A shame no one really ever get to see it that doesn't work there. Hopefully as that strip gets busier, more people check it out.
Found some interesting info about that building, and the site, here:

http://heritagewinnipeg.blogspot.com/2016/11/victory-on-main-street.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3177  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 5:23 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by Arts View Post
Found some interesting info about that building, and the site, here:

http://heritagewinnipeg.blogspot.com/2016/11/victory-on-main-street.html
Yes, the site was right next to the old train station and the Manitoba Hotel was the first grand railway hotel on the Prairies. When it burned down, the ruins were left standing there for years. I’m not sure why. Then, finally, the Industrial Exposition Building went up, which was sort of like the Convention Centre of its day. I would think that the Civic Auditorium, which was another make-work project from the Depression (now the Provincial Archives Building), eliminated the need for the Industrial Exposition Building.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3178  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 5:27 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
300 Main looks surprisingly tall given that it only has two more floors than 55 Nassau has.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3179  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 6:02 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6 View Post
300 Main looks surprisingly tall given that it only has two more floors than 55 Nassau has.
Yeah but the ceilings are only six feet high in 55 Nassau!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3180  
Old Posted Dec 14, 2018, 7:11 PM
Andy6's Avatar
Andy6 Andy6 is offline
Starring as himself
 
Join Date: Mar 2002
Location: Toronto Yorkville
Posts: 9,764
Quote:
Originally Posted by rrskylar View Post
Yeah but the ceilings are only six feet high in 55 Nassau!
I was only there once, when I was about 12. The ceilings seemed adequate but I suppose it was before my growth spurt. That was in the 1970s and I’ve still never been in a higher residential apartment, that I can recollect. It was on the 37th floor.
__________________
crispy crunchy light and snappy
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:24 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.