Quote:
Originally Posted by OCCheetos
Well, it's the CTA going after the city, not MOOSE, and it was the city who turned it into a court case against the CTA (again, not MOOSE). Even if there were a settlement... which, in my limited understanding of law, wouldn't even apply in this case, MOOSE would get none of it.
Edit: To be extra clear, MOOSE went to the CTA who in turn went and ordered the City to reconnect and repair the bridge and then the City went to court with the CTA to overturn the order. No one's going after money here, and MOOSE would certainly have no part in any exchange of money even if there were.
|
Yes, I agree they have not yet been successful. Moose has filed close to a dozen regulatory and judicial actions since it has been in “business” and has otherwise not taken any significant steps to advance its stated business. They have made no attempt to establish a proof of concept, no attempt to license or franchise its business model and no attempt to publicize the advantages of high-density rural living (which is the whole basis of the stated business model). Have you ever heard of a legitimate entrepreneur that spent their first 7 years of operations doing little else but filing regulatory complaints?
Threaded Mode