HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9681  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 4:19 PM
THWg THWg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Posts: 29
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
Since when is O4W considered Midtown?
To be even more particular, 725 Ponce is in Poncey-Highland .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9682  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 4:37 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwbab View Post
This is just the first phase. From the glimpses I caught of the renderings, there will be at least 3 phases. Future phases will address the rest of the property, including the annex building that has an entrance to the MARTA station. Apparently they are waiting for the leases to expire on the existing tenants in the annex building before they can go forward with the rest. They said the leases expire in 2021 but hinted they could negotiate earlier termination if necessary.

They plan to put retail/dining in the annex building opening to the north side of the plaza. They also want to open up the annex building so you can see the MARTA Station below.

They wanted to make the giant mural on the annex building into a video display, but apparently the zoning in Midtown won't allow that.

Look at #2:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9683  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 4:48 PM
jwbab jwbab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post

Look at #2:
It is my understanding that the language of Z-18-68 was intentionally worded to only apply to the video display board at Coda. It is possible, though, that it could also apply to other projects in the district.

Edit: Here is a link to the proposal (may not be the most recent version):

http://atlantacityga.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?ID=15527&highlightTerms=18-o-1372
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9684  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 5:45 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwbab View Post
It is my understanding that the language of Z-18-68 was intentionally worded to only apply to the video display board at Coda. It is possible, though, that it could also apply to other projects in the district.

Edit: Here is a link to the proposal (may not be the most recent version):

http://atlantacityga.iqm2.com/Citizens/Detail_LegiFile.aspx?ID=15527&highlightTerms=18-o-1372
Your link above is an ordinance from June 2018. So you are correct the zoning limited video displays to CODA.

The screenshot I provided is for a Zoning Meeting schedule Sept 11, 2018. The request is to allow for videos display in SPI 16 Subarea 1, which includes 675 West Peachtree. So am I incorrectly assuming this zoning meeting most likely pertains to 675 WP?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9685  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 6:18 PM
Verge Verge is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 861
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
Since when is O4W considered Midtown?
It's all just Midtown to me-- just kidding...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9686  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 6:34 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by Verge View Post
It's all just Midtown to me-- just kidding...
Verge, I am going to smack the S......ugar out of you.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9687  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 9:34 PM
jwbab jwbab is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Atlanta, Georgia
Posts: 420
Quote:
Originally Posted by Atlanta3000 View Post
Your link above is an ordinance from June 2018. So you are correct the zoning limited video displays to CODA.

The screenshot I provided is for a Zoning Meeting schedule Sept 11, 2018. The request is to allow for videos display in SPI 16 Subarea 1, which includes 675 West Peachtree. So am I incorrectly assuming this zoning meeting most likely pertains to 675 WP?
The link I provided was what was introduced to the City Council on June 18, 2018. Scrolling to the bottom, it says the city council considered the proposed amendment and referred it to the Zoning Review Board (ZRB) and City Council Zoning Committee.

I checked the agendas and staff reports of the ZRB since June 18, 2018. It does not appear until the upcoming September 11, 2018, ZRB agenda, which you screen capped above. (Link to ZRB agendas and staff reports here:https://www.atlantaga.gov/government/dep...velopment/zoning/zoning-review-board-zrb)

If it was a different proposal than the one for Coda, it would also have a different case number. Both your screen cap and my link have the same case number: Z-18-68.

I also checked all the City Council Zoning Committee agendas since June 2018 and don't see that it has gone before that committee yet. (Link to City Council materials: http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/standing-committees/meeting-agendas/agenda)

Sometimes these things just take a really long time to move through the bureaucracy.

BTW the sponsor of the ordinance is council member Amir Farokhi. He is active on social media. I am sure would be willing to answer any questions about the proposal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9688  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 9:37 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Quote:
Originally Posted by jwbab View Post
The link I provided was what was introduced to the City Council on June 18, 2018. Scrolling to the bottom, it says the city council considered the proposed amendment and referred it to the Zoning Review Board (ZRB) and City Council Zoning Committee.

I checked the agendas and staff reports of the ZRB since June 18, 2018. It does not appear until the upcoming September 11, 2018, ZRB agenda, which you screen capped above. (Link to ZRB agendas and staff reports here:https://www.atlantaga.gov/government/dep...velopment/zoning/zoning-review-board-zrb)

If it was a different proposal than the one for Coda, it would also have a different case number. Both your screen cap and my link have the same case number: Z-18-68.

I also checked all the City Council Zoning Committee agendas since June 2018 and don't see that it has gone before that committee yet. (Link to City Council materials: http://citycouncil.atlantaga.gov/standing-committees/meeting-agendas/agenda)

Sometimes these things just take a really long time to move through the bureaucracy.

BTW the sponsor of the ordinance is council member Amir Farokhi. He is active on social media. I am sure would be willing to answer any questions about the proposal.
I am glad I ask you these question because you know your sh!t.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9689  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 11:34 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
Curbed’s new post has a shot of Vireo’s progress:


Another good one of midtown:
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9690  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2018, 11:37 PM
bigstick's Avatar
bigstick bigstick is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: 30327
Posts: 1,980
Quote:
Originally Posted by Street Advocate View Post
Curbed’s new post has a shot of Vireo’s progress:


Another good one of midtown:
This has also seemed VERY slow to me ...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9691  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 12:13 AM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
This has also seemed VERY slow to me ...
They broke ground less than a year ago and it’s 20 stories in the air.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9692  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 1:11 AM
scania's Avatar
scania scania is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA (DTLA)/Atlanta, Ga. (Midtown)
Posts: 2,497
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
This has also seemed VERY slow to me ...
Beautiful shots though!
__________________
It's a beautiful day!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9693  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 12:19 PM
ATLSkyPalaceOwner ATLSkyPalaceOwner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 389
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigstick View Post
This has also seemed VERY slow to me ...
Good lord
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9694  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 12:44 PM
Atlanta3000 Atlanta3000 is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Buckhead
Posts: 2,763
Aquarium Expansion Adding a Bike Depot

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9695  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 12:49 PM
tdawg's Avatar
tdawg tdawg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Astoria, NY
Posts: 2,985
The Georgia Aquarium typeface and logo make me angry. I get what they're doing with the G/Fish thing but it's so inelegant. I almost feel like offering them my branding expertise pro bono.
__________________
From my head via my fingers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9696  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 1:23 PM
daharris80's Avatar
daharris80 daharris80 is offline
Development Spectator
 
Join Date: Jan 2007
Location: Atlanta
Posts: 348
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
The Georgia Aquarium typeface and logo make me angry. I get what they're doing with the G/Fish thing but it's so inelegant. I almost feel like offering them my branding expertise pro bono.
I hear you. Given the amount of money that they've invested in this I'm guessing they rejected much better work and got from their branding group exactly what they wanted.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9697  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 3:52 PM
finergrain finergrain is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2018
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by tdawg View Post
The Georgia Aquarium typeface and logo make me angry. I get what they're doing with the G/Fish thing but it's so inelegant. I almost feel like offering them my branding expertise pro bono.
Totally agree. Would have been cool if they went with Chermayeff & Geismar, the legends when it comes to aquarium branding.

I'm a supporter of the aquarium, generally speaking, but this expansion is just looking tacky. The Bank Gothic type doesn't help matters. Oh well.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9698  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 5:18 PM
arctk2014 arctk2014 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 885
Quote:
Originally Posted by finergrain View Post
Totally agree. Would have been cool if they went with Chermayeff & Geismar, the legends when it comes to aquarium branding.

I'm a supporter of the aquarium, generally speaking, but this expansion is just looking tacky. The Bank Gothic type doesn't help matters. Oh well.
Or they could consult with another legendary firm like Pentagram to help them unify the branding.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9699  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 6:01 PM
jayden jayden is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Location: JERSEY
Posts: 1,600
Nice pics of Midtown.

Opus and 1105 W Peachtee will look so good from that angle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9700  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2018, 6:58 PM
Street Advocate Street Advocate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 3,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by jayden View Post
Nice pics of Midtown.

Opus and 1105 W Peachtee will look so good from that angle.
I have a difficult time envisioning 1105's height/impact on the skyline from that angle, although I'm hopeful it would peer over its neighbors. 1125 is at a high elevation and would definitely look prominent.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.