[Coquitlam] 567 Clarke+Como | 49fl |Completed - Page 3

officedweller · #41 Posted **May 25, 2018, 12:28 AM**

From GBL twitter today:

https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects

officedweller · #42 Posted **Jun 30, 2018, 12:54 AM**

From GBL twitter today:

https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects

https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects

From Marcon Homes twitter June 15th:

https://twitter.com/MarconHomes

Nites · #43 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 3:56 AM**

So no one knows the height on this still?

GMasterAres · #44 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 6:24 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by skymaster

So no one knows the height on this still?

Don't see anything anywhere posted even in the planning report but looking at the renders and doing some guesstimating, it is likely to fall between 160 and 165 meters in height.

Just a guess though. Could be slightly shorter, or slightly taller but probably not far off.

Metro-One · #45 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 8:27 AM**

Sent a couple emails to the developer asking, never got a reply.

Can someone spread a rumor that in Chinese culture it is bad luck not to know the exact height of a tower?

I am sure then these developers in Burnaby and Coquitlam would release all the heights to the mm.

red-paladin · #46 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 12:20 PM**

Demoguy · #47 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 8:15 PM**

Don’t wanna know about the exact height, but wanna know the exact depth, that’s one hell of a shore hole....

Nites · #48 Posted **Jul 2, 2018, 9:52 PM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by jhausner

Don't see anything anywhere posted even in the planning report but looking at the renders and doing some guesstimating, it is likely to fall between 160 and 165 meters in height.

Just a guess though. Could be slightly shorter, or slightly taller but probably not far off.

My guesstimate is 170m tops.

Coophaus · #49 Posted **Jul 10, 2018, 3:47 AM**

Its 162m. Parkade is seven levels deep (72').

Nites · #50 Posted **Jul 10, 2018, 5:21 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coophaus

Its 162m. Parkade is seven levels deep (72').

Any sources to back up that claim?

Metro-One · #51 Posted **Jul 10, 2018, 3:14 PM**

I would also like to know the source (and see any diagrams / documents if possible).

PS, I don't doubt you though (really doubt that someone would create an account on a random forum just to give the false height of a suburban tower on their first post, haha), just that the official book keeping on here needs proof / documents.

Also, thank you and welcome!

Coophaus · #52 Posted **Jul 11, 2018, 3:26 AM**

Source is the DP drawing sitting on my desk! Not sure how to upload something here...

Metro-One · #53 Posted **Jul 11, 2018, 3:32 AM**

You need to use a third party program.

If it is a paper document take a snap and upload it.

I know many use photobucket on here.

I use Flickr myself. Then you post it using the photo fiction in the menu above.

Again, thanks for the info!

Nites · #54 Posted **Jul 11, 2018, 5:33 AM**

Quote:

Originally Posted by Coophaus

Source is the DP drawing sitting on my desk! Not sure how to upload something here...

The quickest method is to use gyazo (not the greatest quality) which allows you to take a quick screen shot of your picture and after doing so it will send you to a web page in which your picture will appear. From there all you need to do is right click on the photo and copy the image details and post it here using [IMG]"Insert image details here without qutoes"[/IMG].

You can use a third party hosting site but it will take longer.

HighPockets · #55 Posted **Jul 26, 2018, 9:22 PM**

Most of the "skyhome" penthouse units for 567 Clarke remain unsold - and units facing South and East just got harder to sell.

The City of Coquitlam has started the process on a proposal for a 50-storey tower a block away (1 storey higher than 567 Clarke).

Details and copious renderings:

http://dailyhive.com/vancouver/508-524-clarke-road-coquitlam-burquitlam-station

officedweller · #56 Posted **Jul 26, 2018, 10:04 PM**

I would expect the redevelopment of Burquitlam Plaza would have more view blocking potential.

LeftCoaster · #57 Posted **Jul 27, 2018, 5:55 PM**

1 storey higher, but with C+C's larger retail podium and higher base elevation it will still likely appear higher and maintain its views.

officedweller · #58 Posted **Aug 7, 2018, 11:00 PM**

A moody #exterior #amenity view for 567 Clarke + Como in West Coquitlam
https://twitter.com/wearedesignstor

Our #rendering of the Level 49 Sky Lounge at 567 Clarke + Como.
Entertain in style with panoramic west coast views, a chef's kitchen and bar,
sports lounge, and outdoor patio and BBQ.
https://twitter.com/wearedesignstor

567 Clarke & Como VR

Video Link

HighPockets · #59 Posted **Aug 14, 2018, 1:22 AM**

Thanks for the links to the renderings, Officedweller.

Very realistic. Almost too much so...

I used the 3D interactive VR walkthrough for 567 Clarke + Como when its presentation center was still open. I accidentally walked right off the balcony and found myself floating 500 feet or so in space... You know it's not real, but still freaky!

officedweller · #60 Posted **Aug 29, 2018, 10:21 PM**

From GBL twitter today:

https://twitter.com/GBLArchitects