HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Reload this Page [Coquitlam] 567 Clarke+Como | 49fl |Completed
Register FAQ


    567 Clarke + Como in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Coquitlam Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location

Reply
Viewing Page 1 of 14

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2017, 10:39 PM
dothediu dothediu is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Posts: 70
[Coquitlam] 567 Clarke+Como | 49fl |Completed
Coquitlam's Tallest Tower proposed warrants its own thread

http://marcon.ca/567/

Lots of great elevation/site plan in this document: http://www.coquitlam.ca/docs/default-sou...blichearing-2016_11_28item3.pdf?sfvrsn=2

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2017, 11:46 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 18,039
Thank you, but —. I did a quick look through the document, was able to find nearly every stat except for one.... the — height!

All the floor space / area stats are there. Was able to find the ground elevation of the site. Was able to find everything but the mother — height. Maybe someone else can find it somewhere in there? Even found the podium height, but not the tower!

(The swearing is done for flavor, but seriously, what is it with the suburbs not releasing the height or at least profile drawings where we can at least determine the height from?)
Reply With Quote
     
           
     
  #4  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 2:54 AM
excel excel is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 3,484
Wow looks great. Love how it has the amenities mid tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #5  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 4:30 AM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 8,197
I'll guess 502 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #6  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 5:03 AM
jollyburger jollyburger is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Posts: 15,842
Well the podium is 28 feet. I'll guess around 530 feet.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #7  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 5:07 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,137
That is going to be really visible for miles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #8  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2017, 6:38 AM
Henbo Henbo is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Posts: 186
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
That is going to be really visible for miles.
Yea, the elevation of the site is already 110m, so this tower could really top out around 270m. The highest point of Burnaby Mountain is about 330m.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #9  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2017, 12:13 AM
David's Avatar
David David is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2001
Posts: 1,453
Amazing... I still can't believe there's a chance something like this is going to be built in Coquitlam!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #10  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2017, 5:25 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,408
Coquitlam is building nice towers. I love the design of most of their towers in their city centre and this would have fit perfectly there too. I love how they have so far avoided the spandrel madness going on everywhere else. Although, the smaller tower next this and visible in the rendering is currently going up and a spandrel mess. I hope they don't mess this landmark building which will indeed be very visible.

I only wonder how come they didn't go for 50 floors, to make a nice round number.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2017, 8:49 AM
giallo's Avatar
giallo giallo is online now
 
Join Date: Apr 2002
Posts: 12,764
I really love this development for Coquitlam.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #12  
Old Posted Mar 24, 2017, 9:14 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,137
has it been approved yet? i can't find any news but it seems like they are going to start sales soon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #13  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 5:13 AM
towerseeker101 towerseeker101 is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2016
Posts: 138
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
has it been approved yet? i can't find any news but it seems like they are going to start sales soon
They have been heavily advertising the development at various Skytrain stations and in the local newspaper so I'd assume that it has been approved.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #14  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2017, 5:14 AM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 40,137
yeah. Last I heard in November was there was opposition by people in the area, but that is to be expected. Cool to see it get going.

I wonder how long till Burquitlam Plaza goes bye bye. Exciting changes in my neighbourhood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #15  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 1:18 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Posts: 10,408
This was posted in another thread earlier, so linking it here too.


http://www.tricitynews.com/news/coquitla...raffic-with-new-tower-proposal-1.3483219
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #16  
Old Posted Apr 28, 2017, 8:26 AM
Nites Nites is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 1,558
Judging by the renders this has got to be around 150-160 meters. Maybe even 170m.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #17  
Old Posted May 25, 2017, 6:49 PM
pok3mytummy pok3mytummy is offline
 
Join Date: May 2015
Posts: 37
Apparently anything below floor 12 is already sold or on hold for developers F&F so starting prices will be a lot higher than their pricing list released
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #18  
Old Posted May 26, 2017, 8:27 PM
IBatman IBatman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by pok3mytummy View Post
Apparently anything below floor 12 is already sold or on hold for developers F&F so starting prices will be a lot higher than their pricing list released

What does the pricing look like for this?!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #19  
Old Posted May 28, 2017, 2:25 AM
CoastMeridian CoastMeridian is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 14
Quote:
Originally Posted by IBatman View Post
What does the pricing look like for this?!
According to the pricing sheet I got from their presentation center:
  • 1 bedroom, 463-530 sqft: starting from $349,900
  • 1 bedroom + den, 538-595 sqft: $360,900
  • 2 bedroom, 771-910 sqft: $485,900
  • 2 bedroom + den, 852-948 sqft: $650,900
  • 3 bedroom, 875-1030 sqft: $739,900
  • 3 bedroom + den, 1287-1359 sqft: $1,199,900
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #20  
Old Posted May 29, 2017, 4:50 PM
IBatman IBatman is offline
 
Join Date: May 2017
Posts: 9
Quote:
Originally Posted by fp252 View Post
According to the pricing sheet I got from their presentation center:
  • 1 bedroom, 463-530 sqft: starting from $349,900
  • 1 bedroom + den, 538-595 sqft: $360,900
  • 2 bedroom, 771-910 sqft: $485,900
  • 2 bedroom + den, 852-948 sqft: $650,900
  • 3 bedroom, 875-1030 sqft: $739,900
  • 3 bedroom + den, 1287-1359 sqft: $1,199,900
Thank you for the info!

Is the presentation center still going on? Or are they at the sales stage now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply
Viewing Page 1 of 14

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Reload this Page [Coquitlam] 567 Clarke+Como | 49fl |Completed
Forum Jump

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »

Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:50 AM.

      
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.