Quote:
Originally Posted by mcgrath618
If you don't mind my asking, why?
It's a bit difficult for a discussion to start if you just give a blanket opinion.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier
You're entitled to your opinion, and I'm entitled to tell you you're comically wrong.
Morris Adjmi is one of the best architects out there working in that particular aesthetic. These are some of their other works:
If anyone can pull off that joined-together Chelsea-Highline look, it's them, mostly because they created it in the first place.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by Londonee
I agree. I think it's arguably the most interesting proposal we've seen here in years. Some forumers think contrast is bad for contrast's sake - and that's just a specious line of thinking.
|
Just looked through there work, and I agree, most of it is very very good. Doesn't change the fact that this proposal is not.
I actually tend to love the contrast of old brick buildings with contemporary additions.
This Race St building isn't that. It's a brand new brick building, and the odds are against it looking in any way authentic (though I hope to be proven wrong), which turns this into a phony attempt at something that has been achieved more organically in other locations.
In addition to this, I think the tower portion itself is awful. Rather than a clean contrast, the concrete/alucubond (can't tell which) frame makes the "addition" look too heavy, not to mention makes it look like a soda can. The cantilevers are half-hearted and lessened further by the frame. The 1/3 centered balconies look thoughtless.
So yeah, all my opinion, but there it is. Philadelphia has plenty of brick buildings that could use a contemporary over-build. This faux-historic attempt is embarrassing. Sorry to offend.