Posted Apr 30, 2018, 9:08 PM
|
|
Registered User
|
|
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 2,513
|
|
4575 Granville
Pre-application Design
Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend
|
Rezoning Design
Quote:
Opposition to Rental Homes Near Hospice Masks Concerns About Lower Property Values
This wasn’t an easy post to write, as several years ago my mother passed away from colorectal cancer that was only diagnosed after it had spread throughout her body. My parents decided they didn’t want her medicated and dying alone, so they brought her home and I watched her wither away, suffering and slowly losing not only her life, but her identity. I understand the need for hospice care, and the sacred space it provides families because my mother didn’t have that experience.
The badly needed rental homes proposed for this location were always going to be a wedge issue. Not only because of their location next to the hospice, but because of the entitlement of some in this neighbourhood. I feel the applicant has done a lot to mitigate the effects of this building, as they relocated the parking garage entrance, added more plantings to the south to act as a noise/privacy barrier, and added more parking stalls to calm neighbours concerns about future residents taking up street parking. Frankly, I’m not concerned about the impact these new homes may have on the hospice because there won’t be any. There’s proof of this with existing health sites, like St John’s Hospice next to the 18 story Promontory condo tower at UBC, May’s Place at 333 Powell, or Cottage Hospice in Burrard View Park, which is located next to a day care, children’s playground, and event tennis courts. All of these are just as, or more noisy than rental homes that are set at prices which are somewhat obtainable for young professional families...
|
Continued at https://cityduo.wordpress.com/2018/04/30...ks-concerns-about-lower-property-values/
|