HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


View Poll Results: Based on options for Broadway Corridor Study, what is your preferred choice?
BRT: Commercial to UBC 25 6.16%
LRT A: Commercial to UBC OR Commercial via VCC to UBC 31 7.64%
LRT B: Main St. to UBC AND Commercial to UBC 18 4.43%
RRT: Commercial to UBC OR VCC to UBC 283 69.70%
COMBO: RRT to Arbutus/LRT to Main St via Arbutus 39 9.61%
BUS: Enhanced Bus Service for all buses to UBC 10 2.46%
Voters: 406. You may not vote on this poll

Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #8761  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 10:28 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,540
Could also be planning for 2 separate passes with a smaller boring machine, like Canada Line under False Creek and downtown.
     
     
  #8762  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 1:46 PM
nickbeaulieu nickbeaulieu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 257
has there been any information about when they plan to break ground?
     
     
  #8763  
Old Posted Apr 11, 2018, 4:40 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Waders View Post
Source

2025? 5 to 6 years contruction time seems to be really long!
I think a TBM can go through about 15m of soil per day in good conditions.


8000 meters divided by 15m/day = 533 days

If we take 260 working days in a year, that's 2 years of digging. But that doesn't include all the delays inherent in a project of this magnitude, plus staging, plus maintenance days for the machines, plus non-digging days when the TBM goes through a station box...

So realistically it's probably close to 3 years of just boring.

Then add to that finishing out tunnels, laying track, installing signalling equipment, testing, etc. That's easily another year.

Not to mention all the work needed before the machines actually start boring, which is about another year.

So realistically, you're looking at minimum 5 years for a project like this.
__________________
In the heart of a busy metropolis skyscrapers are a vivid reminder of the constant yearning of the human spirit to rise to God
     
     
  #8764  
Old Posted Apr 13, 2018, 11:03 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,110
It'd be nice if they could phase in the first part just to Cambie and then finish the rest in phase II, but I know that won't happen.
     
     
  #8765  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 5:59 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
[Deleted]

Last edited by Reecemartin; Nov 18, 2020 at 1:04 AM.
     
     
  #8766  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 6:19 PM
Colin4567 Colin4567 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2017
Location: Lower Mainland-ish
Posts: 234
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
For the Eglinton Crosstown in Toronto they met 2 pairs of TBMs in the middle, not saying that will happen here but, it is possible and it could cut the time in half. Just thinking out loud.
And that project is 10 years for completion in total - hopefully not a model for Vancouver (although the Arbutus Extension is shorter)
     
     
  #8767  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2018, 9:42 PM
jsbertram jsbertram is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 3,245
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Could also be planning for 2 separate passes with a smaller boring machine, like Canada Line under False Creek and downtown.

they can have two TBMs running at the same time from the launch box- one boring the EB tunnel, the other boring the WB tunnel.


don't underestimate the incentive & competition of one TBM crew wanting to be better and safer and faster than the other - bragging rights and early completion $$$ bonus too.
     
     
  #8768  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 5:11 PM
Reecemartin's Avatar
Reecemartin Reecemartin is offline
YouTube Creator
 
Join Date: Sep 2015
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 1,776
[Deleted]

Last edited by Reecemartin; Nov 18, 2020 at 1:04 AM.
     
     
  #8769  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 6:12 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Reecemartin View Post
The Scope of the Eglinton Crosstown is significantly larger than maybe any transit project in Canada's History. It will have 3 interchanges with the existing Subway. (Where they have to rebuild the subway platforms as well all while keeping it in service) it also has 3 separate underground sections (2 at Eastern Stations and the Long Subway Portion at the West) and an elevated section. Not to mention it involves rebuilding several existing stations at the 3 GO interchanges but, also building entirely new GO stations at some locations. Not to mention the stations are larger than anything we have in Vancouver.

10 years is very reasonable.
Good that Toronto is finally getting the large piece of added trasit infrastructure it needs, especially considering how large a city it is.

Back to Vancouver, if they could agree to build to Arbutus in x number of years, but perhaps being able to open a Cambie /Canada Line, (of course), but maybe even to Granville?
..... before the teminus as Arbutus is in. - Just connecting to the Canada Line as a symbolic first phase in the interim of finshing to Arbutus, would be a cardinal step.
     
     
  #8770  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 6:29 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,587
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Back to Vancouver, if they could agree to build to Arbutus in x number of years, but perhaps being able to open a Cambie /Canada Line, (of course), but maybe even to Granville?
..... before the teminus as Arbutus is in. - Just connecting to the Canada Line as a symbolic first phase in the interim of finshing to Arbutus, would be a cardinal step.
I wish they could do that too (open to Cambie while continuing on to Arbutus) but where are they going to have the launch pit with all the removed dirt / mud coming out to be taken away? In theory they could move the pit from station to station *if they have room to do so* - where along the Broadway corridor do they have that?
     
     
  #8771  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 7:18 PM
Alex Mackinnon's Avatar
Alex Mackinnon Alex Mackinnon is offline
Can I has a tunnel?
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,201
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbertram View Post
they can have two TBMs running at the same time from the launch box- one boring the EB tunnel, the other boring the WB tunnel.


don't underestimate the incentive & competition of one TBM crew wanting to be better and safer and faster than the other - bragging rights and early completion $$$ bonus too.
It gets to be less efficient that way unless you have a larger launch pit. It would probably cost much less, but I'd imagine the per TBM production rates would be slowed.

I think Broadway is going to have relatively small launch pits anyway you work it. The last concept I saw had the tunnel starting from Great Northern Way and driving south.Realistically unless a large parcel gets bought by Translink, that's going to be the best staging area.
__________________
"It's ok, I'm an engineer!" -Famous last words
     
     
  #8772  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 7:33 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
I wish they could do that too (open to Cambie while continuing on to Arbutus) but where are they going to have the launch pit with all the removed dirt / mud coming out to be taken away? In theory they could move the pit from station to station *if they have room to do so* - where along the Broadway corridor do they have that?
The parking lot at City Hall.
     
     
  #8773  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 9:33 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,540
But that's on the wrong side (east) of Cambie.
If the station is centred under Cambie, they can't remove spoils from an open pit east of Cambie and still operate the station at Cambie (since the spoils would have to travel through the station site to the open pit extraction point.
     
     
  #8774  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2018, 10:13 PM
twoNeurons twoNeurons is offline
loafing in lotusland
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Lotusland
Posts: 6,110
I think Translink SHOULD be buying up land. In fact, I think they should have been buying up land in the last 10 years around potential stations (through 3rd parties, so as not to raise prices). Then, they build a real commercial hub around a station, lease out naming rights, and make the line more profitable.
     
     
  #8775  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2018, 7:20 AM
ilikeredheads ilikeredheads is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Location: west coast
Posts: 651
Quote:
Originally Posted by twoNeurons View Post
I think Translink SHOULD be buying up land. In fact, I think they should have been buying up land in the last 10 years around potential stations (through 3rd parties, so as not to raise prices). Then, they build a real commercial hub around a station, lease out naming rights, and make the line more profitable.
that's assuming they have the money. They don't. And if they were buying up land, you'll have plenty of people complaining Translink is wasting money. No win situation.
     
     
  #8776  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2018, 9:40 PM
Migrant_Coconut's Avatar
Migrant_Coconut Migrant_Coconut is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Location: Kitsilano/Fairview
Posts: 10,059
Or you could have the City buy/takeover the properties and just hand them over to TransLink. Seems like they own half the corridor anyway.
     
     
  #8777  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2018, 6:04 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by Migrant_Coconut View Post
Or you could have the City buy/takeover the properties and just hand them over to TransLink. Seems like they own half the corridor anyway.
the City does own a bunch of strategic land spots for stations. i am pretty sure they already own all the station locations. i heard the earliest purchase was back in 2015.
     
     
  #8778  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2018, 8:23 PM
Jalapeño Chips Jalapeño Chips is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2018
Location: Vancouver, B.C
Posts: 127
Big news:

"UBC pushes for Millennium Line extension to campus; opens door to providing funding"...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ubc-millennium-line-funding-1.4627086
     
     
  #8779  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2018, 8:46 PM
Large Cat's Avatar
Large Cat Large Cat is offline
Vancouver Bus Driver
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Vancouver, BC
Posts: 396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Jalapeño Chips View Post
Big news:

"UBC pushes for Millennium Line extension to campus; opens door to providing funding"...

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/british-columbia/ubc-millennium-line-funding-1.4627086
Please....PLEASE

     
     
  #8780  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2018, 9:05 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,575
Funding... ya, I bet they are willing to pay for UBC station itself, maybe.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:45 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.