Quote:
Originally Posted by Groundhog
Very sad story. Agreed that perception and politics are the biggest roadblocks, but $$$$ is the biggest driver and, in most cases, trumps those roadblocks. Not to get too political, but the Keystone Pipeline is an example of this that pops right out - the technology is there, technically the safest way to transport this stuff, but lot's of fear and political will against it. It's not a perfect apples to apples comparison, but it demonstrates the point. If the powers that be see lot's of green from autonomous vehicles, they'll happen.
|
I agree that money trumps all, but on the issue of driverless cars, I don't think it is clear that all the money would line up on the same side. Uber, google, etc are leading the way on driverless cars and these are companies that of course have a lot of money.
On the other hand though, I would think traditional car companies probably view driverless cars with a healthy dose of skepticism. Many have stated eventually driverless cars will take us to a future where no one owns their own cars. That future can't be good for traditional car companies, who are used to individual owners with multiple cars who purchase new cars every few years. Auto mechanics, consumer auto parts stores, etc would be among the various other entities that could line up against driverless cars. That's why I'm not sure money will be the factor you think it is, because as much money will be lobbying for allowing driverless cars, there will probably be just as much money lobbying against allowing driverless cars.