HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #941  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 9:13 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Cincinnati's topography and traditional built form is similar as well. Or is that not considered Appalachia?
not really sure what people consider it, other than Midwest. It may be considered the far edge of central or western Appalachia?

But yes, certainly similar to Pittsburgh, just not in northeastern Appalachia
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #942  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 9:42 PM
MonkeyRonin's Avatar
MonkeyRonin MonkeyRonin is offline
¥ ¥ ¥
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 10,634
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
So like... Washington DC?

I get what you're saying... a lot of it sprang from the big expositions held in Chicago and St. Louis and maybe elsewhere in Midwestern cities. But that grand "monumentalism" is certainly found in DC and Philadelphia, and largely based on European grand boulevards.

DC is also a grand, planned city for sure, but based on an older model of that. It's narrow rowhouses, minor/non-existent setbacks, and narrow residential streets are of a clearly first-wave east coast urban typology (even if the city is actually a lot newer than its neighbours).

And Philadelphia is probably the most fine-grained city in America, a few early-20th city beautiful gestures aside (Ben Franklin Pkwy is really the only one I can even think of). This is just about the antithesis of Midwestern gigantism.
__________________
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #943  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 10:56 PM
The North One's Avatar
The North One The North One is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2009
Posts: 5,905
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
So like... Washington DC?
Chicago, Cleveland, Detroit and DC are the main cities that participated in the city beautification movement and thought of it as a civic virtue. Denver, Harrisburg, Madison and Des Moines did a little bit of it as well so I guess it's not reaching to say that it was mostly a midwest thing.
__________________
Spawn of questionable parentage!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #944  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 10:57 PM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 30,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
Cincinnati's topography and traditional built form is similar as well. Or is that not considered Appalachia?
You can ask everyone living in the Tri-State if they think that Cincinnati is Midwestern, Southern or Appalachian and you still won't get a consensus.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #945  
Old Posted Feb 21, 2018, 11:03 PM
Sun Belt Sun Belt is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2017
Location: The Envy of the World
Posts: 4,897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buckeye Native 001 View Post
You can ask everyone living in the Tri-State if they think that Cincinnati is Midwestern, Southern or Appalachian and you still won't get a consensus.
It's been a minute, but when I flew into Cincinnati and spent some time there, I was surprised to hear southern accents. Then I had to tell myself that, yep I'm along the Kentucky border and there it's a region where there is a mixing of the north and south.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #946  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 1:55 AM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,030
Thanks for posting those pics of Cleveland MayDay..That style was exactly what I was referring to in my earlier post about the style of buildings I love in when I visit U.S cities that developed earlier, andI know it's not just a Midwestern thing...WTF were architects thinking in the 50's and 60's when functional Brutalist or whatever you call it came in? anyways, different topic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #947  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 4:43 AM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonkeyRonin View Post
DC is also a grand, planned city for sure, but based on an older model of that. It's narrow rowhouses, minor/non-existent setbacks, and narrow residential streets are of a clearly first-wave east coast urban typology (even if the city is actually a lot newer than its neighbours).

And Philadelphia is probably the most fine-grained city in America, a few early-20th city beautiful gestures aside (Ben Franklin Pkwy is really the only one I can even think of). This is just about the antithesis of Midwestern gigantism.
Yeah, I'm obviously aware of how the layouts/built density of cities like DC and Philly differ from many of those in the Midwest. It was more just just the "Midwestern monumentalism" term that I didn't quite get... (and still don't)... that I was wondering about. Explanations have ranged from "oversized, neoclassical architecture" to "Gilded Age" to "City Beautiful movement" to full descriptions of city layouts. If it just means that Midwestern cities are flatter, more spread out, with wider streets, and more grass, then ok... but that doesn't seem to be too monumental. Otherwise, I think you'll find that non-Midwestern cities also have neoclassical and art deco architecture, plazas, statues/monuments, boulevards, massive public works structures, etc. in spades.

And while Philadelphia is certainly one of the "most fine-grained" cities in the US, that is a most apt description for its core. Philadelphia had the first World's Fair (the Centennial Exhibition in 1876... well before Midwestern locales) and established Fairmount Park... which has all the "monumentalism", neoclassicism, broad tree-lined boulevards, arches, statues, gates, gardens, mansions, pillars, fountains, etc. that you could possibly desire.

See, I just don't really get how St. Louis (its core is quite densely built) might exhibit this monumentalism, yet Philly or Pittsburgh somehow do not?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #948  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 3:00 PM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 12,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post

See, I just don't really get how St. Louis (its core is quite densely built) might exhibit this monumentalism, yet Philly or Pittsburgh somehow do not?
not sure this is a blanket argument anyone is making, specifically.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #949  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 3:26 PM
Buckeye Native 001 Buckeye Native 001 is offline
E pluribus unum
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Arizona
Posts: 30,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sun Belt View Post
It's been a minute, but when I flew into Cincinnati and spent some time there, I was surprised to hear southern accents. Then I had to tell myself that, yep I'm along the Kentucky border and there it's a region where there is a mixing of the north and south.
For people not familiar with the area, the fact that the main airport is in Kentucky seems to disorient a lot of out-of-towners.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #950  
Old Posted Feb 22, 2018, 3:39 PM
pj3000's Avatar
pj3000 pj3000 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: Pittsburgh & Miami
Posts: 7,928
Quote:
Originally Posted by Centropolis View Post
not sure this is a blanket argument anyone is making, specifically.
Yeah, probably not. I totally get what you were describing about large midewestern cities feeling like they were built in a grand manner... perhaps built with the capacity for millions more people than actually live there. That's an interesting observation... a certain optimism for growth and an overall elegance of layout in early city planning.

I just didn't get the Gilded Age monumentalism thing as being somehow of the Midwest or Great Lakes, because that flourished in cities outside of the Midwest at the same time and earlier.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #951  
Old Posted Feb 23, 2018, 11:55 PM
Docere Docere is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2014
Posts: 9,059
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #952  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 12:08 AM
jd3189's Avatar
jd3189 jd3189 is online now
An Optimistic Realist
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Los Angeles, CA / West Palm Beach, FL
Posts: 6,803
^^^ From those views, it reminds me of parts of Eastern Brooklyn and much of Queens. Very gritty and dense.



From what was mentioned before, The Quebec-Windsor corridor in Canada seems to share more with the Northeast in the US. Both are the major population areas of their countries where the largest city and capital are located.
__________________
MAWA: Make America Walkable Again
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #953  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 12:42 AM
Razor Razor is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2011
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 3,030
Quote:
Originally Posted by jd3189 View Post
^^^ From those views, it reminds me of parts of Eastern Brooklyn and much of Queens. Very gritty and dense.



From what was mentioned before, The Quebec-Windsor corridor in Canada seems to share more with the Northeast in the US. Both are the major population areas of their countries where the largest city and capital are located.
Yes, there are a lot of parallels there for sure.
18.0 million people (on the Canadian side) through a 1100 mile stretch..Enough to warrant a possible HSR which has been bandied around for quite some time. Ironically they call it the corridor, because of the existing VIA rail line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #954  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 1:24 AM
dc_denizen's Avatar
dc_denizen dc_denizen is offline
Selfie-stick vendor
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Location: New York Suburbs
Posts: 10,990

those that looks like Short north, columbus, not queens or brooklyn IMO.

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9905175,...u06qlqPdU8UwNoL9FYsug!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9836352,...Xc51AdYySbg5gEWj54pLQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656

https://www.google.com/maps/@39.9391897,...Ewe7HFn3Aaax-CkJoiUmQ!2e0!7i13312!8i6656
__________________
Joined the bus on the 33rd seat
By the doo-doo room with the reek replete
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #955  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 1:33 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 12,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by pj3000 View Post
Yeah, probably not. I totally get what you were describing about large midewestern cities feeling like they were built in a grand manner... perhaps built with the capacity for millions more people than actually live there. That's an interesting observation... a certain optimism for growth and an overall elegance of layout in early city planning.

I just didn't get the Gilded Age monumentalism thing as being somehow of the Midwest or Great Lakes, because that flourished in cities outside of the Midwest at the same time and earlier.
i think it's a slightly of out of proportion gigantism, to steal a word that forumer kool maudit once used in reference to the great lakes cities.

they are kind of gangling, like graying teenage basketball players waiting to fill out with muscle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #956  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 2:09 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 12,052

visittheloop.com

i pulled this over from a sort of parallel thread. this isn't a great lakes city, but we sort of decided in the twentieth century that we kind of wanted to be like that in st. louis around 1904.

monoliths and promise. midwesternism.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #958  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 2:47 AM
Centropolis's Avatar
Centropolis Centropolis is offline
disneypilled verhoevenist
 
Join Date: Nov 2009
Location: saint louis
Posts: 12,052
it's all tight on the street, which is satisfying, and the contrast is instructive. midwesternism is an early pulling away from the street and/or into the air.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #959  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2018, 3:05 AM
softee's Avatar
softee softee is offline
Aimless Wanderer
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Location: Downtown Toronto
Posts: 3,433
You really think those two areas look alike? The Kensington Market area is far denser both structurally and in terms of population density. Short North looks spacious and serene in comparison.
__________________
Public transit is the lifeblood of every healthy city.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > City Discussions
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:16 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.