Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller
It's been said by others before, but I'd rather have a bunch of modest-height towers than one big one (as nice as those are).
|
It isn't an either or at all, but I'll be the first to tell you construction is only a byproduct of other factors which control the climate of a city. Philly's doing okay but I don't know what standards others are using when they say the city's going through a boom, whether economically or construction-wise (generally inter-related). Philadelphia is still very much functioning as a city dictated by external market trends, and won't truly reach the next level until it can achieve greater immunity to market fluctuations and progress forward autonomously to an extent (think of the way universities kind of operate in their won bubble at times relative to city market trends). I think people on this forum compare Philadelphia of old to Philadelphia of today (definite improvement) and say, whoa, what a positive difference. True, but look at Philadelphia's peer cities historically. NY, LA, Chicago, San Fran, Boston, DC. They're all doing better at the moment and the gap isn't really lessening. The Houstons, Dallases, Atlantas, Miamis, etc. are also passing Philly. Amazon may come here but probably not because as many positives as Philly has, the city hasn't truly shed its old reputation (and I don't even mean necessarily a negative rep, simply a neutral one). I think we're taking some of the right steps to do that, and hope we can continue to improve as a city and do even bettter. Calling the positive improvements a "boom" is very much a stretch, though. Look at Seattle to see a boom, look at NY to see a constant boom. Philly's been making steady progress, which is good, but so is pretty much every other US city in Philly's echelon.