Quote:
Originally Posted by Feathered Friend
|
This goes to show that, no matter how badly rental housing is needed in Vancouver, projects still find ways to be delayed. The UDP should, of course, be more geared to careful planning, as these projects have big impacts to their urban area and will ideally will be around for decades. That said, one cannot help but feel a little frustrated.
To me it felt this rejection was more a critique of the planning department rather than the applicants. I don't say that lightly, as I believe city staff do a darn good job, but perhaps this time they listened too much to the conservative tones of the neighbourhood. The UDP's chief complaints were that this project should have been taller; that having basement suites in a 3 and half story development is just faulty logic. The consensus was the buildings should be allowed to go to 4 or 5 stories to get rid of the basement suites, and create an improved and more sunny courtyard.
It was felt that the project connected badly to the neighbourhood, and that it looked more like a project out of 1992 suburbia, rather than something that belonged in 2017 Vancouver. I found this funny, as I got the impression that more than a few people at the open house would have preferred a development out of 1970s suburbia.
Lastly, it was felt that the treatment of the heritage house was unneeded. There was no point in wasting money in restoring the home to what it originally looked like when it is today's vision of the house that people hold in their memories. Originally, the motion was made to pass the project with recommendations, however that failed. It was then motioned to recommend the project to resubmit, and that passed with a majority of the panel in favor.