Quote:
Originally Posted by HomerSPC
Due to archaic union regulations in the city, Starbucks hasn't opened a Starbucks with Starbucks employees.
|
Not really '
archaic union regulations in the city,'... tampering with union organization is frowned upon in virtually every jurisdication I know of. And Starbucks did it not once. not twice. but three times!
Starbucks has everything to do with the situation they're in. Starbucks (corporate) was found to have actively tampered with the union & unionization efforts at the Chapters location... so, it's not surprising that after being caught contravening legislation three times, they were put on an extremely short leash. They could open two-dozen corporate locations in Regina tomorrow, if they like. Nothing's stopping them - their behaviour has made an expansion like this more complicated (and likely more expensive over the long term), but they need only look in the mirror for someone to blame.
...and this comes from a guy who is far from a union sympathizer. I'm astonished at how poorly Starbucks repeatedly managed the issue - it's not as though they don't have unionized stores: they do. And it's not like they don't have lawyers who could give advice on how to 'gently' avoid unionization, without pissing off regulators: they do. many of them. They just made a series of stupid decisions.