Quote:
Originally Posted by patm
Flames have a very real chance of moving.
They're a middle of the pack revenue team with a bad arena in a market that has a bleak economic outlook.
|
Flames aren't going anywhere. The NHL just received $500 million from Las Vegas for an expansion team. You think the other owners will let the Flames move to Seattle for any less in a re-location fee?
And if the Flames do go anywhere (and there's damn few places left that can afford the NHL), say hello to Calgary Coyotes or Calgary Panthers (okay, may have to change the nickname).
Full disclosure, I'm from Edmonton, so take what I say with a grain of salt.
Things that made the deal work here, that may not be in play there:
1) The new Ice District used to be acres and acres of dreary, low tax yielding surface parking lots.
2) CRL (Community Revitalization Levy), where the city gets any increased both land and education tax for 30 years.
3) Four and counting new towers going up in addition to the arena already contributing enough tax revenue to pay the city's share and more.
4) Katz eventually ponied up, I think $90 million, in installments yes.
5) Ticket surcharge
6) Option was spend $250 million to put lipstick on the Coliseum pig by actually lowering capacity - no one was buying that.
Katz did play the Seattle card, which got him a public flaying for which he ended up paying for a very humiliating public apology.
Any way it goes, Calgary's a legit NHL market, pro hockey won't be n/a in Calgary for more than a nanosecond.